TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

When I applied for the VS last year and failed to hit the test benchmark, I had this email within 2 days:

“Thank you for taking our online test as part of your application for a Vacation Scheme at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner. We aim to provide all students with guidance on how to improve their application. As a result, please find below feedback which we hope you will find useful.

Unfortunately, on this occasion, you have not met our minimum criteria for our bespoke online test and we will be unable to progress your application any further. You should have received a feedback report which highlights your strengths and development areas, which we hope you have found helpful. We would suggest focusing on the areas of development going forward to improve your performance.

We thank you for taking the time to complete the application process and wish you the best of luck with your future endeavours.”

So the email you got probs indicates that you passed the test benchmark but the written app is why you got a PFO, esp if it’s after a week too.​
Ah okay this makes sense, thank you :)
 
Hi all, I received a PFO from BCLP a week after completing the SJT. This was stated in the email. Does this mean I didn't meet the benchmark or that I met it and my written application was unsuccessful?

"Thank you for your recent application for a Training Contract at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner.

On this occasion, we regret to inform you that your application has not been successful. We aim to provide all students with guidance on how to improve their application. As a result, please find below some useful pointers to demonstrate what we are seeking in strong candidates to progress them to assessment stage, which we hope you will find useful."
This just sounds generic ngl
 
Does anyone have experience interviewing with Farrer & Co for a final interview? Have read online that in the past some of the interviews have run for around 2hrs which seems v long!
Hi!

Congratulations on the Farrer & Co final interview! I was invited back for the final TC interview after my vacation scheme at the firm last cycle, so I can share my experience!

Whilst I can't remember the exact timing of the interview, it wouldn't surprise me if it was around 2-hours in total for the entire assessment. This is because I believe it is split into an interview with the partners, as well as a research task in which you will present your findings to the partners.

Generally speaking, I found that the interview was very conversational and personality-driven compared to some other firms, but was overall similar to what you would expect for a final stage TC interview. They definitely seemed interested in whether they could genuinely see you fitting into the culture of the firm and interaction well with colleagues and clients (+ the culture at the firm was genuinely so great when I was on my VS!). So, while preparation is absolutely important, I would avoid sounding overly scripted or rehearsed and try to let your personality and interest shine through.

I'd also make sure that you are not simply reusing the exact same "commercial law" answers that you may have prepared for other firms. Whilst Farrer's does do commercial work, it is still heavily rooted in private client work and long-term client relationships, so they may be looking for slightly different motivations, values, and interpersonal qualities. If your answers sound too generic or corporate, there is a risk that they won't feel sufficiently tailored to the firm specifically, and I think the interviews/grad rec team are particularly looking at this.

I'd therefore particularly focus on:
  • Having very clear and authentic answers to your core motivations (why commercial law, why Farrer's, why you personally suit the environment there)
  • Being able to discuss your experiences in a reflective way, rather than just descriptively
  • Practising staying calm when asked unexpected follow-up questions
  • Making sure you can comfortably hold a conversation around commercial and legal topics, rather than giving "memorised" commercial awareness answers (+ I'd tailor your commercial awareness to the types of areas they work in, such as UHNW Individuals and Education, etc.)

One thing that helped me a lot when preparing for later-stage interviews was to record myself answering questions or doing mock interviews. It can feel uncomfortable (and I hate watching them back, haha!), but it is often the best way to spot things like rushing, over-explaining, sounding too rehearsed, or not answering the actual question directly enough.

I would also be prepared for questions where they are more interested in how you think rather than whether you immediately arrive at the "right" answer. If challenged or given new information, I'd talk through your reasoning out loud in a logical way and be open to adjusting your view. I think demonstrating good judgement, being comfortable with ambiguity, and engaging with alternative perspectives can often come across better than trying to defend your initial answer at all costs.

For the the research task specifically, I'd focus less on trying to reach the "perfect" answer and more on showing a structured approach. Work through the materials you are given methodically and keep coming back to the actual question or prompt rather than trying to include everything. When you are presenting it, I'd have a really clear structure (e.g. issue -> analysis -> conclusion/recommendation) so that you are not just talking continuously without any direction.

Best of luck - I really enjoyed my time at the firm, and I hope it goes brilliantly for you! :)
 
Hi!

Congratulations on the Farrer & Co final interview! I was invited back for the final TC interview after my vacation scheme at the firm last cycle, so I can share my experience!

Whilst I can't remember the exact timing of the interview, it wouldn't surprise me if it was around 2-hours in total for the entire assessment. This is because I believe it is split into an interview with the partners, as well as a research task in which you will present your findings to the partners.

Generally speaking, I found that the interview was very conversational and personality-driven compared to some other firms, but was overall similar to what you would expect for a final stage TC interview. They definitely seemed interested in whether they could genuinely see you fitting into the culture of the firm and interaction well with colleagues and clients (+ the culture at the firm was genuinely so great when I was on my VS!). So, while preparation is absolutely important, I would avoid sounding overly scripted or rehearsed and try to let your personality and interest shine through.

I'd also make sure that you are not simply reusing the exact same "commercial law" answers that you may have prepared for other firms. Whilst Farrer's does do commercial work, it is still heavily rooted in private client work and long-term client relationships, so they may be looking for slightly different motivations, values, and interpersonal qualities. If your answers sound too generic or corporate, there is a risk that they won't feel sufficiently tailored to the firm specifically, and I think the interviews/grad rec team are particularly looking at this.

I'd therefore particularly focus on:
  • Having very clear and authentic answers to your core motivations (why commercial law, why Farrer's, why you personally suit the environment there)
  • Being able to discuss your experiences in a reflective way, rather than just descriptively
  • Practising staying calm when asked unexpected follow-up questions
  • Making sure you can comfortably hold a conversation around commercial and legal topics, rather than giving "memorised" commercial awareness answers (+ I'd tailor your commercial awareness to the types of areas they work in, such as UHNW Individuals and Education, etc.)

One thing that helped me a lot when preparing for later-stage interviews was to record myself answering questions or doing mock interviews. It can feel uncomfortable (and I hate watching them back, haha!), but it is often the best way to spot things like rushing, over-explaining, sounding too rehearsed, or not answering the actual question directly enough.

I would also be prepared for questions where they are more interested in how you think rather than whether you immediately arrive at the "right" answer. If challenged or given new information, I'd talk through your reasoning out loud in a logical way and be open to adjusting your view. I think demonstrating good judgement, being comfortable with ambiguity, and engaging with alternative perspectives can often come across better than trying to defend your initial answer at all costs.

For the the research task specifically, I'd focus less on trying to reach the "perfect" answer and more on showing a structured approach. Work through the materials you are given methodically and keep coming back to the actual question or prompt rather than trying to include everything. When you are presenting it, I'd have a really clear structure (e.g. issue -> analysis -> conclusion/recommendation) so that you are not just talking continuously without any direction.

Best of luck - I really enjoyed my time at the firm, and I hope it goes brilliantly for you! :)

Thanks so much for your advice Abbie! Those timings make much more sense, I had been worried it was 2 hours after the research task had ended, but an overall length of 2 hours seems more sensible!

And as ever, those are some very helpful suggestions for preparations, thank you!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock