TCLA Community Assistant
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
That’s useful and interesting - thanks. Just out of interest, do you think that causes issues with diversity or maybe has done in the past, or could potentially mean the opposite?
I think it works both ways with diversity.
A very strict competency framework can potentially hinder diversity aims, and the CS put in an extra ordinary amount of effort in to ensure their assessments do not have adverse impact. But that does take a bit of trail and error.
For law firms (and other industries), having flexibility means it is open to more conscious or unconscious bias. However, that can be a good thing for diversity as well as a bad thing.
The CS system is undoubtedly fairer for all. But isn’t without its flaws.
The best system would be to have the very structured competency framework but not have the legal requirements of the hiring principles that the CS has. That would encourage consistency and reduce risk of bias, while allowing some common sense to ensure you hire the most suitable candidates. Some firms do this though!