• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you for the unnecessary advice.

It is my understanding that this forum is to help each other, including on the topic of commercial awareness.
Just because I have asked this question, does not mean I don't have my own thoughts. I was simply asking to start a discussion and confirm my own thoughts.

Good luck with your career.
I would recommend Richard Susskinds "Tomorrow's Lawyers" book, as it quite neatly outlines some of the biggest disrupters to legal services providers. It's quite a light read too - you could get through it in probably a day.
 
Drama on a Saturday night and here I was in bed by 11pm. The lockdown has turned me into an old man.

i'm old jamie lee curtis GIF
 
Was late to the party here, although one user kindly messaged me last night about the account which was then banned.

According to our records, it does look like it was a spam account based in the US. I'm unclear as to whether they were intentionally impersonating someone, or if they created a fake name that just so happened to have the same name as a real applicant. I'm also unclear as to whether they actually had material for the firm they mentioned, or if they were using it as a way to send spam content to those who private messaged them.

I've definitely noticed spammers have become more sophisticated since we started up TCLA. At times, it's very hard to tell because they'll write a few normal-looking posts before beginning to send links. A friendly reminder to everyone to just be cautious, particularly if it looks like a user has only just signed up, and is finding a reason to send an external link.
 
Last edited:
Once one reaches interview stage, is everyone on a level playing field? Or will grad rec sometimes have certain applicants in mind that really stood out that they just want to confirm in interview, while other interviewees would need to be really impressive in interview? This is obviously for firms that don’t do CV-blind interviewing
I don’t think it is ever truly a level playing field as you are still assessing individuals with different strengths and experiences.

But it’s not like candidates get prioritised. I have met loads of people over the years that I have very much wanted to offer a job too because I thought they were great (I may have met them at an open day or campus event) but they didn’t perform well enough in the assessments and so didn’t get an offer. Grad Rec can’t supersede the recruitment process just because they think/hope someone will do well.
 
I'm making a last minute application to Macfarlanes and wondering if anyone had any advice for structuring the 'Achievements' question please. Torn between either providing one detailed example using STAR or three smaller examples which each demonstrate a particular quality. I appreciate there is no wrong answer, but is the firm looking for us to state the quality or is it better to show not say?

Hi, this post from a few years ago lists some advice on the app that GR provided during an Open Day. It says to use the STAR structure but I don't necessarily think you need to stick to one example only and if you feel like you can provide additional examples within the word count then you should!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sibs23
So how could I tie this into why i want to apply to HFW. My point is that i like litigation because of xyz, HFW have a good commercial litigation practice (tier 1) and then how could I tie analysis of this case to illustrate the point.
Hiya

I would mention the practice area of interest then give the case as an example of the firm's expertise. I think it's best to be quite specific here rather than just name-dropping. So think about; why was this case so significant? What were the particular challenges that had to be overcome? Was it particularly complex e.g. did it have cross-jurisdictional elements etc?

I don't have much insight into the particular case at hand but these are the type of pointers I would use when undergoing a case analysis for an interview.

Hope this helps ☺️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaysen
If there is only a work experience section on the form and nothing for positions of responsibility (other than the general app qs where you might bring them in), can you put uni/school roles or volunteering roles and positions of responsibility in the work experience section? This is for Charles Russell Speechlys
 
If there is only a work experience section on the form and nothing for positions of responsibility (other than the general app qs where you might bring them in), can you put uni/school roles or volunteering roles and positions of responsibility in the work experience section? This is for Charles Russell Speechlys
School/uni stuff (no)
Volunteering (yes)

The firm probably just doesn't have a preference for that information.
 
If there is only a work experience section on the form and nothing for positions of responsibility (other than the general app qs where you might bring them in), can you put uni/school roles or volunteering roles and positions of responsibility in the work experience section? This is for Charles Russell Speechlys
I've put society positions on some work experience sections and still progressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iqra
Was late to the party here, although one user kindly messaged me last night about the account which was then banned.

According to our records, it does look like it was a spam account based in the US. I'm unclear as to whether they were intentionally impersonating someone, or if they created a fake name that just so happened to have the same name as a real applicant. I'm also unclear as to whether they actually had material for the firm they mentioned, or if they were using it as a way to send spam content to those who private messaged them.

I've definitely noticed spammers have become more sophisticated since we started up TCLA. At times, it's very hard to tell because they'll write a few normal-looking posts before beginning to send links. A friendly reminder to everyone to just be cautious, particularly if it looks like a user has only just signed up, and is finding a reason to send an external link.
Just to add to this, I reached out to Olivia and she really appreciates us looking out for her and is very grateful to the TCLA family for their support :)
 
So how could I tie this into why i want to apply to HFW. My point is that i like litigation because of xyz, HFW have a good commercial litigation practice (tier 1) and then how could I tie analysis of this case to illustrate the point.
I think you could perhaps use this case as evidence of your justifications for why you like litigation/arbitration e.g. the complex/problem-solving nature of the cases, how you have to come up with a strategy and then continually adapt/adjust so that you can allow your client to achieve the best result possible etc. Otherwise, if it doesn't really fit in to your reasoning/feels a bit forced then it's good commercial awareness to have in this practice area :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OB
Status
Not open for further replies.

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.