- Sep 9, 2024
- 763
- 1,418
To take your questions in turn:hi @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman
I have made it to the video presentation round of kingsley’s tc application process and wanted some advice.
For background, we have been given a defamation case and we have to pitch to a client who is an individual who has been defamed (the reality tv star) . We will be marked on the following points -
1. why your firm should be instructed to undertake this work.
• Introduction
• Content and structure of your presentation and use of resources provided
• Client care and empathy towards the client who has been defamed and understanding his perspective
• Delivery, impact and credibility of the presentation overall
The issues I am facing here are we only have 3 mins to pitch and finish the whole thing and also if we should talk as if we are speaking to the client directly when giving the pitch so basically saying, “you should hire us because….” or should we just talk to the interviewer (the person from the firm hearing the pitch) so basically saying “they should hire us because….”
It is not on zoom and we need to record and upload it.
The jist of the matter is - A, a reality TV star, was falsely accused by a tabloid of cheating on his wife and pursuing a 15-year-old, based on a photo of him kissing B. He sued for defamation and privacy breach, won £150,000 in damages, and got the article removed. However, other outlets still have old coverage online, including embarrassing details from the trial. A now wants help removing all remaining content, as it’s harming his reputation and career.
We have also been giving two fact sheets which are basically 1. Information on media law and privacy copyright and defamation and 2. Right to be forgotten fact sheet.
I am unsure in how much legal depth I should go and what format should I follow to make the pitch should good in just 3 mins. Which departments in the firm can be used to solve this?
Thank you very much in advance.![]()
• Both because of how these exercises are generally conducted and because of how the firm has specifically referred to assessing you on your ability to show "client care" and "empathy", I am quite confident you are supposed to answer as if you are talking to the client directly.
• Because of the time limits I do not think there will be an expectation for you to go in any level of depth on the legal matters. What they will be looking for is likely to see if you can identify the core legal points, apply them to the facts, and state your conclusions in a clear and concise manner.
• There's no set format to follow for this type of presentation - my advice is to just go for the structure that seems most intuitive and easy to follow to you. If this were my presentation, I would probably have a very short introduction stating the facts, then I would pitch the firm's expertise, and finally I would explain how the firm would plan to deal with the case based on the legal points you have researched.
• Different departments might be involved depending on the particular firm, as different firms structure their practice areas differently. The teams I expect would be involved would be the general litigation teams and then specialist advisory media/IP law teams.