@Andrei Radu Hey! I have been enjoying your responses around structuring answers on apps. Just wondering if you have an idea of the best way to structure the answer to this Q-
What do you find attractive about BCLP's sectors/departments and which area(s) are you interested in having exposure to in your Training Contract and why? Max 500 words it is quite lengthy! How many sectors/departments would you recommend discussing? Thank you
Hi
@e_turbo2 I would discuss 3-4 sectors/departments and I would use use the following structure:
Paragraph 1: Firstly, I would mention the sector or department I am interested in and explain why, describing both (i) the substantive features of the department/sector that attract me (i.e. what about the particular tasks/matters I would work for interests me) and (ii) any relevant examples of experiences related to the department/sector. Secondly, I would go on to explain why I would be interested in working in the sector/department at
BCLP in particular: here, I would analyse the firm's team and expertise in the area in depth, looking at rankings, awards, notable deals/cases and comparisons with rivals.
Paragraph 2, 3 , 4: I would simply repeat the above, but for a new sector/department;
Advice on how to use all the word count without unnecessarily lengthening your points:
- Since the firm mentions both sectors and "departments", you can likely discuss practices areas of the firm as well, which increases the breadth of what you can discuss.
- You should describe your experiences in a lot of depth, using a STAR structure.
- You can analyse the firm's expertise in as much depth as you want, going though important matters they worked on and their impact, mentioning top practitioners, recent hires and strategy, etc.