Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
I think this means, if you were working in the firm, what’s steps you would need to undertake to know how best to advise them on the matter.
I don’t think they are expecting you to know how specifically you would advise the client now, but instead what resources/suppprt you might utilise...
As they are specifically guiding you on what to cover I don't think you need to include a why commercial law section, especially as you are covering "why are you attracted to the work we carry out" as that can effectively be similar content anyway. However, if you feel you need to cover "why...
A lot of firms work on the basis of non-rolling being that they do not make any offers until they have reviewed all applications, but that they start the earlier stages during the application window so it isn't a manic rush at the end.
I don’t know enough about AI to be 100% certain on this.
I think being restrictive on using AI is absurd though. I suspect it feels like when firms wouldn’t let people write typed answers to applications and made them still submit handwritten application forms 😂
Like any AI (even spellcheck) use it as a guide rather than absolute. If you take that approach and only use what you are happy to integrate rather than any suggestion, it usually works quite well.
It would be pretty easy to review applications within a couple of days if they did have capacity.
Technically any spell checker (even on Word) is AI, which is why the idea of not using AI in applications is particularly bizarre. I don’t think a firm would pick up on the use of Grammarly though.
If it is a particular deal/matter, I think it needs to have wide reaching consequences for the legal sector, which is often not the case for many deals/cases. Therefore a broader story might be more appropriate unless there is something ground breaking about the deal/matter.
If it is clear there is an improvement in grades this will be taken into consideration.
I can't say that A-levels and your undergraduate degree will be completely discounted though - that is five (or more) years of education compared to only two years of your GDL and LLM. It is also tricky if...
Generally, yes they are.
Although it does depend what the circumstances are and also how long a period you are claiming them for.
It becomes very difficult for recruiters to determine your true ability if the majority of your evidence is impacted by the circumstances.
Put frankly about...
I would only continue applying if you would renege the existing VS offer to accept a potential new one. There is no point applying to firms if you are not going to accept an offer from them.
Firms will only be interested in the VS you have completed and the TC offers you have and even then it’s...
I don’t think you need to do this unless the firm explicitly asks.
You can tailor your evidence to the firm by emphasising skills, topics, or values that might be aligned to the firm, but I don’t think you need to explicitly link it back to the firm. If the evidence is there, your reader will...
I think this is the right approach - this would distinguish the two answers as the first would only cover why the firm, while the second would be focusing more on the job (e.g. what type of roles/responsibilities would you like doing).
Yes - you can include positions of responsibility within this question unless there is a separate question/section asking specifically for this evidence.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.