Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
17 December 2025
5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK)
Hosted on TCLA TV
Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!
The cover letter is usually only a page of A4 so actually covering those 3 things requires careful drafting. As for being generic sometimes it can be but the why law as a career can really only come from your experiences that led you to law and also why the firm too ro some extent. Unless...
I don't think they are looking for both. They are looking for what you achieved at your specific uni. They recognise unis grade differently.
At mine it was a % eg 72%
At a friend's their modules were graded A-D.
The classification usually is required when they ask for year 1, year 2 etc...
They will be higher.
You will know if you were entered into a lower scoring gcse. Highers mean that the grades will go up to a 9 or A* so I would assume they are the ones you entered.
QUOTE="jacksollaf, post: 206545, member: 38681"]
that's strange, because i literally just got this email when i applied:
"Dear x,
Reference: x
Thank you for applying for a role at Shoosmiths.
We will be in touch after the deadline of the vacancy you have applied for to confirm the outcome...
I think I read somewhere they said that due to the increase in number of applications to their vac schemes they were confident they would be able to fill all TC vacancies from those applicants so would not therefore be opening a direct TC route this year.
It doesn't mean they haven't. It just means they haven't posted. Previously I have posted but upon realising that at some there are so few applicants that I would be easily recognisable I no longer do because I want to retain my anonymity.
My 2 theories:
They timed your response to the one with the error in. How long did you take to end up guessing?
They were testing resilience and how well you performed after that question or did it throw you off kilter 😭🤣
Just adding to the PEP calculations debate. It doesn't always show profitability accurately as some partnerships have equity partners on a lockstep basis. Also some firms earmark a portion of profits for both the non equity partner bonus "pots" and indeed other fee earners and non-fee earner...
Maybe the first with hindsight could come across as rude but it wasn't meant to be. I was actually trying to joke that even as a non law student I can see the relevance.
The second definitely not. It isn't just an employment issue. Hence the comment framed as a question. This is same type of...
?
I simply wouldn't expand more fully on my answer whilst processes are ongoing but gave another example than the one they suggested.
Calling someone mad rude and condescending because they explain why an interview question is a valid one is possibly the more rude response.
If you look at my...
I often help people here and by DM. I simply don't understand why it is any different to not disclosing specific questions whilst processes are undoing which is what is asked if us. I wasn't being combatative merely explaining there were reasons why this IS being asked by firms at interview...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.