They don’t need to hear all of them. I’d pick a couple of the most interesting eg: drafted a research note on AI technology development and a memo for a biotech company on the impacts of a new law.
Because the mandatory seat will be in an area you are interested in, and therefore it is guaranteed you will experience it. If it wasn’t mandatory, other trainees could get a seat in an area you are interested in over you.
Obviously the big question is whether the mandatory seat(s) is in an...
Because they are not transactional. The advisory work is often done ahead of the transaction to formulate it or is done even ahead of the transaction even starting - the advisory work may have triggered the transaction for instance.
Transactional work tends to be long hours as you are bringing...
Difficult to say clearly as this definition will vary between firms. For instance, I know of Corporate advisory seats - it’s just the work the team does is always advisory rather than transactional. This means they keep clients up to date on things influencing their market, new legislation and...
I’d check in with your contacts in Hong Kong or contact the London office to discuss. Sometimes these things don’t transfer across offices (sometimes they do though).
It’s not unethical - just part of the process. It isn’t ideal.
It would only be unethical if you received support from the firm and then didn’t pay back that support.
They have offered you a job. Clearly they don’t care about you reneging another firm’s offer. They may just might be concerned you do the same to them, but clearly that’s a risk they are willing to take.
Reneges happen a lot in recruitment (less in law for TCs due to the time lag and financial...
You can renege. Unless you have accepted any financial support (unlikely in 6 days) then there are no issues with you reneging really apart from annoying firm 1.
To me this is a question you would prepare more broadly for interview preparation more generally (can also be good preparation for applications) rather than for a specific firm.
Focus on explaining the unique elements of your work experience and your specific impact or achievements. There is little point using phrasing like “I worked with trainees and associates” to describe a vacation scheme for instance. I’d much prefer to know the specifics of the work you did. For...
They just want your opinion on the topic and some practical solutions to how an organisation may help to maintain their culture when people are not always in the office.
Think about how that impacts culture, information sharing, learning and development, a positive/healthy working environment...
Phone them - it’s polite. You’ll need to follow up on writing though.
Just keep it simple - you’ll no longer be proceeding with you offer as you have secured a TC elsewhere which you will be accepting.
be prepared for them to ask:
- which firm you are reneging for
- why you are choosing the...
It always is at times of recession. The job market tightens and people who would have considered other careers tend to lean towards law because it’s one of the more stable entry point careers.
Plus people tend to make more applications when they perceive a bigger risk.
But I’d stress it’s...
If you want to. I don’t think it is necessary, but there is no harm in doing it either. There’s no point going into the detail of the failure aspects just down to the lack of marking though.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.