• WIN: Lunch with Willkie Trainees!
    15 Oct 2025 5:00 pm – 6:00 pm (UK) Zoom (registration required)
    Put your knowledge of Willkie Farr & Gallagher to the test in this interactive quiz session. The winner will enjoy lunch with Willkie trainees!
    Register on Zoom →
  • Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →

2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

ab1147

Esteemed Member
Jan 21, 2021
97
105
Hi guys! A friend of mine did an interview and had these two separate questions: "why X firm" and "what are the USPs of X firm". I was wondering how to go about differentiating the answers to these two questions? In most of my application forms where they ask "why us" I mostly talk about USPs and why those matter to me, so I'm not really sure how I would differ my answers?
 

Victoria R

Distinguished Member
Jul 17, 2020
52
119
Hi guys! A friend of mine did an interview and had these two separate questions: "why X firm" and "what are the USPs of X firm". I was wondering how to go about differentiating the answers to these two questions? In most of my application forms where they ask "why us" I mostly talk about USPs and why those matter to me, so I'm not really sure how I would differ my answers?
IMO they're looking for why the firm appeals to you in the first question, and why it would stand out to clients in the second. I think it's okay if there's overlap in your answers, e.g. innovative offerings will typically be both appealing to TC candidates and clients, but your reasoning for 'why the firm' would be personal whereas in a 'USP' question should be client-centric :)
 

ab1147

Esteemed Member
Jan 21, 2021
97
105
IMO they're looking for why the firm appeals to you in the first question, and why it would stand out to clients in the second. I think it's okay if there's overlap in your answers, e.g. innovative offerings will typically be both appealing to TC candidates and clients, but your reasoning for 'why the firm' would be personal whereas in a 'USP' question should be client-centric :)
Thank you so much this makes so much sense ☺️
 

Naomi U

Legendary Member
Future Trainee
Forum Team
Dec 8, 2019
221
368
Hi guys! A friend of mine did an interview and had these two separate questions: "why X firm" and "what are the USPs of X firm". I was wondering how to go about differentiating the answers to these two questions? In most of my application forms where they ask "why us" I mostly talk about USPs and why those matter to me, so I'm not really sure how I would differ my answers?
Hiya!

I agree with Victoria. I think they are quite similar but the former is slightly more subjective than the latter. So I would approach these questions as; why X firm- means why are you interested in the firm but what are the firm's USPs- means objectively speaking what are the firm's main marketing points. So your answer to the fomer may overlap with the latter but may also include personalised experiences e.g. culture

Hope this helps ☺️
 

Jony

Legendary Member
M&A Bootcamp
  • Oct 19, 2020
    183
    948
    Farewell, Cooley

    Amy Sedaris Goodbye GIF by truTV’s At Home with Amy Sedaris
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.