• Hey Guest, applications for BCLP’s Open Day close at 12pm on 25 September. Apply via this link. We wish you the best of luck!

General Discussion Thread 2020-21

Status
Not open for further replies.
You started this by being annoyed by Jess because she hadn’t responded to someone’s query over a Friday night. That’s just petty and unreasonable.

Whatever issues you’ve had in the past, I feel you’re coming into this forum with a big chip on your shoulder. It’s absolutely fine to be upset and of course graduate recruitment make mistakes, but there’s no need to be rude or take this out on the TCLA team.

Pointing out a bias by replying to a post isn't exactly taking anything out on somebody but apparently the threshold is quite low here. My sincerest apologies.

Edit: To echo your sentiment from yesterday: Thanks for the disagree vote too - very mature of you.
 
@Jessica Booker

Bit of a random one, but I was wondering in what format do grad rec generally view your application? Is it in the same format of the document that you get when you click 'Save to PC' before sending, or something else?

Good question - just a tricky one to answer!

It will vary from firm to firm. Some for instance will have certain “CV blind” processes that may redact out certain information you could see, but they can’t.

Also other information will definitely not be visible to the recruiter - for instance, you might be able to see your equal opps answers (gender/age/ethnicity etc) but they won’t see that on an individual application.

They may also see things in a different order to you. Main example is that you tend to see your personal details first, as it’s usually the first information you put in to create an account. The firm may not see this information at all (as it actually sits outside of your application, and only on your “account”), but sometimes firms can choose to reorder questions or sections when they “print” applications. This sometimes happens if there is more weighting on one part of the application or if they find people generally fall down on that section more.

But with these exceptions, generally I’d say they can see what you can see in the same format you can see it.
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Adam Gilchrist
Hi all, I am applying for winter vac schemes but I am still no sure how it will work out in case I hopefully get one as I am working afternoons and evenings as well. Can anyone, who has had a virtual vac scheme, share some details about their programme in terms of hours? Did you normally worked 9-5 for example or were your days pretty much packed with something happening 9-9? Thank you :)

Just to reiterate what's already been said, I too would recommend avoiding other work as much as possible when doing a virtual vac scheme. I worked until 11pm each night for the ones I did and was shattered each day. The weekend was mainly spent prepping for the interview and assessments and catching up on a bit of sleep. If I was also working another job in those 2 weeks I think performance and enjoyment of the vac scheme would have suffered greatly.
 
All these posts about NRF rejecting you straight away are making me so nervous! :S
I can't even imagine how frustrating it feels

I think this was what I was trying to avoid (albeit unsuccessfully). Rejection is horrible whenever it happens, I really wouldn't want people to go through a process of second guessing themselves purely because of when they hear back.
 
For a question about what challenges are there in a legal sector- is it too generic to talk about tech (specifically a part of tech I will go into) & how law firms are keeping up with it. I feel that is the area I know most about but I don’t know if it’s too generic
 
For a question about what challenges are there in a legal sector- is it too generic to talk about tech (specifically a part of tech I will go into) & how law firms are keeping up with it. I feel that is the area I know most about but I don’t know if it’s too generic

Sounds like it won't be generic if you are talking about specific tech
 
Hi all, I am applying for winter vac schemes but I am still no sure how it will work out in case I hopefully get one as I am working afternoons and evenings as well. Can anyone, who has had a virtual vac scheme, share some details about their programme in terms of hours? Did you normally worked 9-5 for example or were your days pretty much packed with something happening 9-9? Thank you :)
In my experience, the VS was completely packed.

9-5 were standard hours for practice talks/Q&A and so on, but on top of that there was also heavily suggested virtual networking (not obligatory, but since it was virtual it was the only real extra way of showing additional interest), and enforced socials, so the office hours were more like 9-7.

As well as 'office hours', the tasks that we were given to complete were all extremely time-consuming, and were to be completed in our spare time, so I don't think I was ever finished before 22/2300 each night. That seemed to be the broad experience of other people on the scheme too. Weekends were equally busy, and the only "free" period was at the very end of the scheme - but by then you needed to use those few free hours to prepare for the TC interview.

That said, this particular MC firm has squashed their entire 4 week scheme into 2 weeks, and so some firms were less intense (a friend of mine on the same VS who had an additional VS at another MC firm said it was much more relaxed), but personally, I wouldn't want to risk having to juggle both a vac scheme and work. I was lucky enough to have an employer who gave me as much time off as required (the only upside to zero hour contracts), but I do appreciate not everyone has this option.
 
Last edited:
Anyone whos made it to Linklaters AC, what did you get as your strong/weak attributes on the test?
If you're interested in last year's experience (that got me an AC invite), my highest-scoring attributes were respect & working with others, my lowest scoring attribute was resource & work management.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find member