Ah ok, thank you! Did you write much about each event or just a sentence or two?
I didn't write anything about each event, but if I had a W&C specific one I'd have gone into a little more detail like @Alice G suggested
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah ok, thank you! Did you write much about each event or just a sentence or two?
Thank you Alice, very helpful! What about things like insight days? Do they deserve a sentence or two too?
I don't think I have been to 12 standalone workshops or presentations.
Don’t worry about the quantity and I’d only add a line or two if it’s with W&C, if the insight day was with them then yes I would do![]()
Is it worthwhile applying to firms whose deadline in on the 31st and their schemes are on a rolling basis?
@Jessica Booker If I'm abbreviating a firm's name in question one (e.g. "Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF)"), is it fine to keep referring to the firm as HSF throughout the application, or should I introduce it for the first time in every question as "Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF)"?
Does anyone know what proportion of places are given to direct TC applicants and VS attendees at White & Case?
Got it, thanks!once in the first question/section is fine
This may be a silly question but..
In the context of US firms, when talking about the work they do, would you focus on the work that the London firm is known for?
For example, if a firm is known for its corporate takeovers in the US but is only band 3/band 4 in London, is it not worth mentioning as I will be joining the London office?
Is it also redundant to talk about deals that the London office did not work on?
This may be a silly question but..
In the context of US firms, when talking about the work they do, would you focus on the work that the London firm is known for?
For example, if a firm is known for its corporate takeovers in the US but is only band 3/band 4 in London, is it not worth mentioning as I will be joining the London office?
Is it also redundant to talk about deals that the London office did not work on?
I agree with everything that has been said but just wanted to say here and remind everyone, there is no such thing as a silly question on TCLA. Always best to ask us and clarify something - don't be afraid toThis may be a silly question but..
In the context of US firms, when talking about the work they do, would you focus on the work that the London firm is known for?
For example, if a firm is known for its corporate takeovers in the US but is only band 3/band 4 in London, is it not worth mentioning as I will be joining the London office?
Is it also redundant to talk about deals that the London office did not work on?
Does anyone know if it would still be worth applying to Dechert? I am still writing my application and the deadline is the 31st of December.
Additionally, if anyone has any advice for the question: 'Dechert is frequently retained to work on the most challenging matters, and prides itself on its ability to deliver premium legal services and sound business judgment to its clients. In your opinion, other than the above, what are the three key reasons why our clients instruct us?'
Finallyif anyone has any ideas on would be beneficial to add in the box 'If applicable please state any additional information which you think is relevant to your application or which you think has not been covered adequately in this form' I would really appreciate any advice!
![]()
For the ‘why you’ section of the Freshfields personal statement, is it better to arrange paragraphs by quality/skill or by experiences? I feel like if I do it by experiences I can demonstrate more than one skill per experience but not too sure which approach to take.