yeah I think the different criteria thing might be the way to go... there's not many firms with healthy direct TC intakes still open sadly so feel i can't be picky
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2023-4
- Thread starter Jessica Booker
- Start date
I sorta feel like I'm only getting to the ACs because I have VS at a top firm on my application and I will continue to f up ACs/not be good enough
Jessica Booker
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
- Aug 1, 2019
- 13,469
- 19,259
Sounds like you need to persevere if you are just missing out, and work on your confidence. It sounds like you have got the skills/knowledge needed, it’s just about getting them across in a confident and clear way.
ACs tend to demonstrate polish more than ability.
Coming from a normal background often means that the first time you get to practice is the real thing and that often makes things look a bit rusty.
What I’d advise is firstly to research into each firm’s AC the day before to get an idea of the tasks as they are often more copy-paste than you’d think. Secondly, try and show a bit of passion and conviction even if it’s not truly natural.
The former makes it appear as though you’re less likely to leave and the second gives you more chance to have any mistakes slide past the recruiter.
Also remember that interviews are often to find cultural fit as well as your qualities and some firms might not think you’ll suit them (for example some areas of work require slaves while some require sensitive people to understand the client)
If I were you, I would have a backup plan for a non-legal career.
Over the years, what I have realised is that quite often, you are not rejected for "you are not capable of doing the job well."
So, it is not solely your fault.
Most of these mechanisms are simply "justifications" for allocating limited resources, such as spots for training contracts.
Think of it the other way:
If you were rejected for the reason that "we do not think you are capable of performing the duties of this role," you would not struggle at all.
What you would likely do is simply go back, improve your skills and knowledge, and apply for other opportunities.
But right now, you might feel like you are banging your head against the wall.
If you have gone through interviews for experienced hires, you would have heard stories where the line manager explains with solid, sound justification as to why they have found a better, more suitable candidate.
Sometimes, it is because the chosen candidate brings additional skills or domain knowledge to the table.
Sorry if I am being blunt and direct, but I think it is better to get the message across clearly.
You can keep applying, but having a backup plan is essential.
Haha, "ACs tend to demonstrate polish more than ability" hits the nail on the head.
Great point!
bakers test just now, applied 14 mar
Hi - Congrats, very happy for you. How many days are you getting to take the test?
"We ask that you complete the test by 23.59pm on Friday 19 April 2024 in order for us to process your application as quickly as possible."
Took the situational judgement test and verbal reasoning tests today. The preparation link for the verbal reasoning they give is helpful- split into sections like spellchecking, ranking responses in terms of positivity, matching responses to the tone of a given email and classic verbal reasoning etc. My SJT closed on me after some time, is this normal for the test to cut you off?
For sure there will be more. I heard back mid-late April with a test last yr.
Were there several batches last year? Will cry if I left applying too late
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Locked
- Locked
- Sticky
