TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5

[Iwanobealawyer]

Freshfields issuing a SJT randomly with no prior announcement is so strange. Those who attended the application masterclass will agree that this was not mentioned, there is no prior preparation and only those who pass will get their application reviewed.

 

[Sad_Old_Grad]

Freshfields issuing a SJT randomly with no prior announcement is so strange. Those who attended the application masterclass will agree that this was not mentioned, there is no prior preparation and only those who pass will get their application reviewed.

Yeah, not ideal... I don't mind Watson Glaser Tests, but not a fan of SJTs

 

[jta227]

Firms don’t have to give four weeks - it is just considered best practice if the TC or sponsored law school training is not starting fairly soon.

The voluntary code is just that - voluntary. There are no regulatory issues with accepting a TC and continuing to apply elsewhere. However, I have heard people having their applications withdrawn when they have said they have an existing accepted offer. This is different to holding an offer (that they haven’t decided on).

Is it common for a TC offer letter/contract however to preclude you from seeing out your applications to other firms/attending future vacation schemes?

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

Is it common for a TC offer letter/contract however to preclude you from seeing out your applications to other firms/attending future vacation schemes?

I wouldn't say it is common but I have had enough people contact me about such terms in their offers to know it isn't rare. It usually is just restricting you from doing summer vacation schemes though, rather than having to withdraw from all recruitment processes.

 

[futuretraineesolicitor]

anyone heard back from kirkland for the direct tc?

 

[gazdgazd11]

DWF VI - any tips? Please I’m begging can help with Reed Smith (VI - failed but can help w questions), Blake Morgan (VS completed) , Brown Rudnick (final interview)

 

[desperateTCseeker1998]

DWF VI - any tips? Please I’m begging can help with Reed Smith (VI - failed but can help w questions), Blake Morgan (VS completed) , Brown Rudnick (final interview)

When did you hear back about Reed Smith? I took the VI around when you did but not heard yet

 

[RS Sanjanaa]

did anyone hear back from goodwin post VI?

 

[Tintin06]

Applied to White & Case's VS. Still heard nothing after applying, however. Should I apply for direct TC? Is that possible in this cycle? Anyone got experience of that here? Thanks in advance for your help.

 

[jacksollaf]

Hey everyone; does anyone have any advice for DAC's critical thinking post-vi

 

[Harvey Specter - Presiding Partner]

Applied to White & Case's VS. Still heard nothing after applying, however. Should I apply for direct TC? Is that possible in this cycle? Anyone got experience of that here? Thanks in advance for your help.

White & Case direct TC route is non-rolling and is open until July so you’d be waiting really long before getting a response.

Maybe they are still considering your application for the VS. Don’t rule yourself out just yet.

I have seen people on this forum that had applied for winter VS back in Sept/Oct and got invited to AC for a Spring or Summer VS instead.​

 

[Equity'sDarling]

Kennedys AC!

 

[Harvey Specter - Presiding Partner]

Usually how many trainees will White & Case recruit from the direct TC route? I feel like most of their TC are from the vacation scheme..

They say it’s around 80% from VS. They take on up to 50 trainees a year so 40 from VS. That leaves 10 slots for direct TC.

They have around 25 spaces per VS so 75 to 80 in total. That leaves a 50% conversion rate from VS to TC.​

 

[24aa2001]

Kennedys AC!

Congratulations!! For which one??

 

[Amma Usman]

SH’s why law and why the firm questions are both 600 words. Would it be necessary to format that with introductions and conclusions. 600 words is kind of long but I wouldn’t think it’s long enough for that. @Amma Usman @Jessica Booker

In situations like this, I typically included a sort of thesis statement at the start. I would divide it into roughly two paragraphs. One on why CL, the other on why SH. I would start the paragraph with something like “I am drawn to a career in commercial law for multiple reason but will focus on: X, Y, Z. In the next paragraph, I would write something like I am drawn to SH for mainly X reasons: X, Y, Z. Then, I will take each of the three components in turn and address them appropriately, backed up with real life examples.

Doing this, even in a short sentence at the start, helps signpost your reader and makes everything flow, especially given such a long word count.

With regards the last bit of your question, I don’t see a need to include a conclusion in this case.

 

[Amma Usman]

Could really use some urgent help - was just about to do the Clyde and co digital assessment but I got locked out of my cappfinity account. I don’t know what to do. Anyone have any idea what I can do right now?

I would email Grad Rec with a screenshot of the issues you’re facing and a detailed description of the situation. If you also can’t try logging in after attempting for like three times, it’s worth highlighting this in the email too. This has happened to me before and firm’s are usually understanding in such situations - I would not worry too much.

 

[ke.nabbk26]

I am sorry to hear about the PFOs. Writing applications is like a muscle that constantly needs flexing. I assure you that despite those PFOs, you would have improved your writing skills - and that’s the most important thing beyond those rejection emails.

Another thing is that if you genuinely aren’t interested in the contentious practices as much, then that’s fine. It just requires you to apply to more transactional-focused law firms, since showcasing that link would be easier given your broader interests and experiences. That said, early on in your career I don’t recommend throwing away exploring that side too (this is me talking beyond the application stage). When the time comes, you can choose to do more rotations in transactional law, but at least one in a contentious seat. I have spoken to many lawyers who have mentioned that their qualification options shocked them. However, it all boils down to personal preference on your part.

Back to the topic of discussion. If you’re comfortable, you could post your answers to why law and why X firm on the forum, and I could review them and provide feedback.

Thank you for your kind words!

Actually, it’s quite the opposite. I’m more drawn to contentious work due to my background as a foreign-qualified lawyer (civil law country - which means PGDL + SQE + TC). I’m also open to transactional seats, particularly in banking and finance. Although I haven’t worked in these practices in my home country, I did study some regulatory and banking modules during my LLM.

I’m not sure whether firms tend to prefer candidates who show more interest in transactional seats over litigation. The firms I’m targeting have been ranked highly in commercial litigation and corporate crime and investigations, with strong reputations for their work on recent leading litigation cases (e.g., Willkie, AG, Macfarlanes, Dentons, HL, Fieldfisher, NRF, WC).

A member kindly took the time to look one of my applications and gave me some honest and valuable feedback. I will refine the remaining applications, and if things don’t work out this cycle, I will consider signing up for the review service, or post here.

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

Hi everyone,

I just want to remind everyone in the TCLA community that we are all at different stages of our learning journeys about the legal industry, law firms, and recruitment processes.

Please be mindful of this, especially when responding to posts that you may think have a straight forward answer to or you feel could easily be answered via some online research.

TCLA is often part of people’s research - people come here to get advice from a community whose views they collectively respect. They utilise our community’s experience and opinions to try and get a multidimensional perspective to the questions they pose. This is ultimately why we exist as a forum.

Therefore, it is not appropriate to pass negative judgement on someone just because they don’t have the knowledge you do. Going out of your way to try and belittle others for the level of knowledge they have compared to you is not appropriate and is a clear breach of TCLA’s terms.

Thankfully 99.99% of the time, our community provides the supportive environment we purposefully want to create and maintain. It is on very rare occasions that a small minority of community users feel they should go out of their way to make others feel uncomfortable or inferior.

If you have experienced such behaviour, please remember you can always report it to use using the report button you will find on every post, private message or individual profiles. We take such behaviours seriously, will investigate it accordingly, and where necessary, take action against those who don’t abide by TCLA’s terms.

Many thanks

Jess

 

[ke.nabbk26]

Very happy for you congrats! My tips would be to focus on aligning your answers with the firms strengths. Feel free to DM me if you want more tips

Thank you so much!

I looked at their values on the website before the test. I got collaboration and resilience as my top strengths, and client centricity as an area for development.

 

[24aa2001]

If other people received an AC today and I didn't does this mean PFO?