Has anyone who did London ACs/Vac Schemes for CRS heard back re training contracts? I believe they’re still doing ACs for either Guildford or Cheltenham but I was under the impression that we would hear this week?
In my experience it’s just a standard part of their process. If you don’t have your results for that academic year when you apply, they sometimes wait for the grades before assessing your application. If you haven’t had that email they might not have gotten to your application yetSorry, by the same you mean they received the email or they didn’t? just trying to manage my expectations haha
Yes I have had my application on hold once before the AC stage at Clifford Chance last year, but subsequently received a rejection. But you never know! 🤞🤞Has anyone ever had an application on hold?
I think it's too early to assume, seems like most people that got the VI+SJT applied late May or early JuneHi all,
If I haven't received anything from Reed Smith, is it looking like a rejection? I applied 11/06
Hi everyone. How often are firms happy to extend the acceptance deadline for a TC (or even to hold the offer)? My current deadline is in the middle of my VS starting next week. Many thanks!
Thank you!I think normally firms are happy to extend the acceptance deadlines, but it depends on many factors. Some firms don’t offer extensions and so the original deadline remains. 🥲
In that case, you could accept the TC offer and if you convert the SVS into a TC, accept it and renege on the original TC offer (if the SVS firm is the firm you prefer to do your TC with). 🙂
I think the only time this wouldn’t work is if you received financial support from the TC firm for the purposes of PGDL/SQE/LPC etc. Best of luck with the upcoming SVS! 🐐
i think the general guideline is if the application page doesn't ask for grades elsewhere, include them on your cvHi all, does anyone know if CV should include all module grades? I am trying to finish my application for Dorsey, but they didn't mention whether the CV should include detailed breakdowns.
Plus is there an impact if my CV goes beyond one page? Right now mine can stay at one-page as long as I skip the detailed breakdown and only highlights the relevant optional modules.
This is very Slaughter and May. Most apps will ask for this. Unusual to have it in CV. Because it takes up much space. Best of luck with your applications.Hi all, does anyone know if CV should include all module grades? I am trying to finish my application for Dorsey, but they didn't mention whether the CV should include detailed breakdowns.
Plus is there an impact if my CV goes beyond one page? Right now mine can stay at one-page as long as I skip the detailed breakdown and only highlights the relevant optional modules.
Hi @Ram Sabaratnam sorry for the late reply - saw this just a few days ago! Thank you so much for your detailed insights, really helped inform my approach!Hiya @InterestInPublicLaw
This is a great start. Just to address your last question at the outset, Burges Salmon has historically recruited on a non-rolling basis. I think it's worth double-checking whether this is still the case, but from what I can tell they've consistently recruited on this basis in recent cycles.
For Q1, I think it would be great to mention culture here (in addition to whatever else you'd like to say). However, I would avoid making culture the sole focus. You could structure your answer with one paragraph on the firm’s sector strengths or standout client work (and this is where you should be quite specific (referring to particular rankings, clients, or cases if possible, rather than generalities about sector focus)). Then you can even follow with a paragraph covering both culture and even training style/opportunities.
In terms of Q2, I think focusing on two aspects of the solicitor role is perfectly fine and often stronger than trying to cover too many points lightly. Just ensure that for each point you go beyond generic statements. In particular, you'll want to convincingly show how and why the skill or aspect appeals to you, perhaps linking it to how you’ve seen it in practice (through work experience or commercial awareness).
On Q3, I think it’s important to be clear about what the question is asking. In particular, the question is about practice areas, not sectors. A practice area is the seat you're sitting itself (e.g. planning, tax, corporate). A sector, by contrast, is an area of the economy or industry (e.g. energy, infrastructure, or financial services) which may cut across several practice areas. If you are interested in a sector, you can certainly mention it, but you need to frame your answer around the specific seats/teams you would want to experience. For instance, an interest in the energy sector might lead you to choose seats like projects, construction, or planning. Avoid simply writing about sectors in the abstract. The firm is looking for evidence that you understand the nature of the seat work and are making choices based on that understanding.
While some overlap between the three questions is inevitable (and fine), I think it's in the framing of your answers that you will be able to avoid repetition. Use Q1 to establish why the firm appeals to you overall (with culture and sector strength), Q2 to show how you think about and approach the role of a solicitor itself, and Q3 to show that you’ve thought carefully about how to build a training contract that aligns with your interests and future goals.
I hope this is helpful and good luck with the application!
They rejected me post-app in previous cycle for direct app as all the TC spaces had been filled through the VS.Hi there, I heard that Eversheds dont really recruit from Direct TC applicants. Could anyone provide more insights? I know it's always with applying even for a slim chance but feeling a bit burnt out and there are other deadlines soon so wanted to get some statistics / numbers. Couldn't find any percentages on their website.
Yikes. Thanks for your reply!They rejected me post-app in previous cycle for direct app as all the TC spaces had been filled through the VS.