TCLA General Discussion Thread #2 (2021)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jacob Miller

Legendary Member
Future Trainee
Forum Team
  • Feb 15, 2020
    897
    2,389
    Seeing announcements on LinkedIn for TC offers from the schemes I've completed - I've managed to keep a lid on it until now but this is so nerve wrecking!
    Fingers crossed! The wait is the most agonising part, without a doubt - do bear in mind, though, that not all firms will make their offers all at once. Many firms will make a batch of offers, then wait a while before issuing another batch as they need to wait and see broad acceptance rates etc etc.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: H S and Andrew M

    Matt_96

    Legendary Member
    Future Trainee
  • Dec 15, 2018
    455
    1,196
    Currently having the most surreal week ever. Haven't heard back from my one VS yet (but snooping on my fellow vac schemers on linkedin suggests they haven't got offers or rejections either) but have received two separate interview invites from different firms. I already had two direct TC interviews and a first round telephone interview lined up afterwards anyway, so somehow I've now ended up with 5 possible backups if things go south. It's nice to know I have options for once....
     
    D

    Deleted member 2707

    Guest
    How important is it to discuss defining characteristics of a firm in your application? For example, is it a must to discuss private client work if applying to Macfarlanes or the 8-seat-TC for Freshfields? I'm worried that forcing it into my application may make it sound too generic. Conversely, I'm worried not mentioning it means I am not well-acquainted with the firm.
     

    Dheepa

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Future Trainee
    TCLA Moderator
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    M&A Bootcamp
    Junior Lawyer 43
  • Jan 20, 2019
    853
    2,163
    How important is it to discuss defining characteristics of a firm in your application? For example, is it a must to discuss private client work if applying to Macfarlanes or the 8-seat-TC for Freshfields? I'm worried that forcing it into my application may make it sound too generic. Conversely, I'm worried not mentioning it means I am not well-acquainted with the firm.
    I think it’s important to show an interest in the firm’s work and ideally at least one of it’s core areas of expertise (ultimately that proves you have done your research and are actually interested in the work at that firm) but that doesn’t mean you have to show an interest in all their defining characteristics, whether that’s about a particular area of work or the training. It’s only worth mentioning characteristics that are personally important to you and explaining why that is so and you’re completely right in saying forcing it without that personal link back to yourself will come across as generic.
     

    Jessica Booker

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    13,339
    19,152
    How important is it to discuss defining characteristics of a firm in your application? For example, is it a must to discuss private client work if applying to Macfarlanes or the 8-seat-TC for Freshfields? I'm worried that forcing it into my application may make it sound too generic. Conversely, I'm worried not mentioning it means I am not well-acquainted with the firm.
    Definitely not a must to claim either of those if they are not of interest to you or less important than other aspects you want to highlight.

    There is much more to both firms than these individual factors, and if anything not citing them will probably help you stand out for the right reasons, unless you can provide evidence/rationale as to why those things are important to you.
     

    Jessica Booker

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    13,339
    19,152
    This is a fairly unrelated question but could saying that you want a more 'intellectually challenging' career be offensive to someone who has close relatives in my old career? It's come up in conversation during a vac scheme and reflecting on it, I feel as though it may have come across badly. I did caveat by saying I found it to be a challenging career in different ways.
    Highly unlikely to offend them. At worst they may just disagree with you and think it is intellectually challenging. Not everyone will measure intellectually challenging work the same way. Often with these type of conversations (in applications and interviews, not in informal conversations), it is important to explain WHY or WHAT will make it more intellectually challenging for you as an individual.
     
    • 🤝
    Reactions: Kubed

    Jacob Miller

    Legendary Member
    Future Trainee
    Forum Team
  • Feb 15, 2020
    897
    2,389
    This is a fairly unrelated question but could saying that you want a more 'intellectually challenging' career be offensive to someone who has close relatives in my old career? It's come up in conversation during a vac scheme and reflecting on it, I feel as though it may have come across badly. I did caveat by saying I found it to be a challenging career in different ways.
    I think it depends on a lot of different factors (e.g., context/ tone etc) and also not least the particular career in question. It's no secret that commercial law is intellectually challenging - so I don't think that's a 'wrong' thing to say per se - and it's also no secret that not every career is intellectually challenging in the same way, otherwise anyone and everyone could become a lawyer where that's clearly not the case in practice.

    Unless it was said in a particularly condescending/ patronising/ out of context/ otherwise unpleasant way, which it doesn't sound like it was, I really wouldn't worry too much here.
     
    • Like
    • 🤝
    Reactions: Kubed and Jessica Booker
    D

    Deleted member 2707

    Guest
    I think it’s important to show an interest in the firm’s work and ideally at least one of it’s core areas of expertise (ultimately that proves you have done your research and are actually interested in the work at that firm) but that doesn’t mean you have to show an interest in all their defining characteristics, whether that’s about a particular area of work or the training. It’s only worth mentioning characteristics that are personally important to you and explaining why that is so and you’re completely right in saying forcing it without that personal link back to yourself will come across as generic.
    Definitely not a must to claim either of those if they are not of interest to you or less important than other aspects you want to highlight.

    There is much more to both firms than these individual factors, and if anything not citing them will probably help you stand out for the right reasons, unless you can provide evidence/rationale as to why those things are important to you.

    Thank you both! This is reassuring to know as I was re-reading applications from this cycle and fell as if thats what was a big issue of mine.
     

    Jacob Miller

    Legendary Member
    Future Trainee
    Forum Team
  • Feb 15, 2020
    897
    2,389
    Hi all, is private equity usually under a law firm's corporate practice area? I can't seem to find the answer on this.
    It broadly falls under the transactional bracket so I woukd start looking through transactional practice areas. Specific "layout", so to speak, will vary extensively be firm though so I couldn't tell you exactly where to look for each firm.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: breadpitt

    S87

    Legendary Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 4, 2018
    1,644
    2,402
    Guys,
    I am currently applying to Slaughter and I am not understanding something. The website says that you can apply for a law vacancy if have a completed a qualifying law degree. But if you have already finished the gdl you can apply for non-law vacancy. I have completed both the GDL and LPC, so does it mean that I do not have a qualifying law degree?
     

    Jessica Booker

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    13,339
    19,152
    Guys,
    I am currently applying to Slaughter and I am not understanding something. The website says that you can apply for a law vacancy if have a completed a qualifying law degree. But if you have already finished the gdl you can apply for non-law vacancy. I have completed both the GDL and LPC, so does it mean that I do not have a qualifying law degree?
    Yes - I suspect they would still consider you a non law applicant, but worthwhile contacting them to check.
     

    Asil Ahmad

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Forum Winner
  • Mar 29, 2020
    1,640
    2,160
    29
    It broadly falls under the transactional bracket so I woukd start looking through transactional practice areas. Specific "layout", so to speak, will vary extensively be firm though so I couldn't tell you exactly where to look for each firm.
    Would you say PE is a form of M&A as it is private M&A but it is so much different from M&A for example funds in PE. But correct me if I am wrong here as I am still at basic on PE.
     

    Hele25

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Jan 5, 2021
    180
    608
    So I have a zoom interview for a TC (still pinching myself), BUT I’m really nervous if I get asked the question “why did you not apply for our VS?” Because honestly, my answer was that I didn’t believe I could get it so why try really hard only to be rejected. My mindset has now altered however to - you won’t get anything if you don’t try/just back yourself you’re a bad b**** 😂✨
    I just don’t want to be seen as defeatist or lacking commitment as I truly am so resilient. It’s just that last year was really difficult dealing with constant rejections and at the time I couldn’t cope with more. Should I just make something up instead? 😂🤦‍♀️
     

    Jessica Booker

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    13,339
    19,152
    So I have a zoom interview for a TC (still pinching myself), BUT I’m really nervous if I get asked the question “why did you not apply for our VS?” Because honestly, my answer was that I didn’t believe I could get it so why try really hard only to be rejected. My mindset has now altered however to - you won’t get anything if you don’t try/just back yourself you’re a bad b**** 😂✨
    I just don’t want to be seen as defeatist or lacking commitment as I truly am so resilient. It’s just that last year was really difficult dealing with constant rejections and at the time I couldn’t cope with more. Should I just make something up instead? 😂🤦‍♀️

    You could frame it in a more positive way. You could state that you wanted to apply when you felt you were in a stronger position and that you spent the time between vac scheme and tc applications developing yourself further (using evidence of how you have done this) and that since then you felt now is the right time to apply.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: breadpitt

    Kola

    Legendary Member
    Sep 27, 2020
    125
    726
    Would you say PE is a form of M&A as it is private M&A but it is so much different from M&A for example funds in PE. But correct me if I am wrong here as I am still at basic on PE.

    PE should be seen as an industry that the firms acts within - like Oil & Gas, Projects, Chemicals, or Real Estate. M&A should be seen as a service that the firm provides, like debt finance or litigation. Services cater towards industry, which is of course broad. So, PE is not a form of M&A, but rather M&A is a service provided within the industry of PE.
     

    Hele25

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Jan 5, 2021
    180
    608
    You could frame it in a more positive way. You could state that you wanted to apply when you felt you were in a stronger position and that you spent the time between vac scheme and tc applications developing yourself further (using evidence of how you have done this) and that since then you felt now is the right time to apply.
    Thanks Jess, this is really good advice!
     

    Jacob Miller

    Legendary Member
    Future Trainee
    Forum Team
  • Feb 15, 2020
    897
    2,389
    Would you say PE is a form of M&A as it is private M&A but it is so much different from M&A for example funds in PE. But correct me if I am wrong here as I am still at basic on PE.
    I completely agree with what @Kola has said here. I think that's a phenomenal explanation.

    While PE houses often engage in M&A work, I think it's slightly back-to-front to say abstractly that PE = M&A. I would really encourage you to see them as separate and distinct: PE work has so many nuances and requires real specialists that not every M&A lawyer could manage a deal for a PE house.

    The other thing to remember (on a more basic level) is that M&A does stand for Mergers and Acquisitions. In my mind, that's a bit of a misnomer for most PE work which is almost invariably focussed on partial or full-stake acquisitions.

    In any case, I dont want to wildly overcomplicate things, so would reiterate Kola's point to consider PE an industry focus which will use specialist transactional-focussed teams.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.