TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
- Thread starter Jessica Booker
- Start date
-
- Tags
- vacation scheme
I got a VS offer! Turns out I was a reserve 🥺 Would love to receive any tips please!
Jessica Booker
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
- Aug 1, 2019
- 15,427
- 21,536
Generally the rule would be not worthwhile applying unless:
- you have mitigating circumstances
- the firm uses language like “we typically look for candidates who have achieved” rather than “candidates must have achieved”
- you think you would have multiple flags in a contextualised recruitment process and you are marginally off the criteria the firm has.
Hi guys, I've received a TC offer from a huge US firm in my first cycle of applications, and I'm quite happy about it! Couldn't have done it without TCLA and this forum!
However, I wanted to wait until after my summer VS at an MC to see which one might be a better fit. So I asked them to extend my signing period, and they've given me until after the SVS.
This might sound a bit funny, but I just keep thinking “what if they suddenly rescind it?” since technically I haven’t signed the contract yet. Has anyone heard of this actually happening? I'm terrified of this happening during the wait for the SVS in case all their slots fill up or something. Just wondering if this fear is normal or if I’m overthinking. 🥲
However, I wanted to wait until after my summer VS at an MC to see which one might be a better fit. So I asked them to extend my signing period, and they've given me until after the SVS.
This might sound a bit funny, but I just keep thinking “what if they suddenly rescind it?” since technically I haven’t signed the contract yet. Has anyone heard of this actually happening? I'm terrified of this happening during the wait for the SVS in case all their slots fill up or something. Just wondering if this fear is normal or if I’m overthinking. 🥲
Jessica Booker
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
- Aug 1, 2019
- 15,427
- 21,536
After putting all the effort into recruit you, a firm isn’t going to rescind an offer just because you have asked for time to consider another vacation scheme. They want you to make an informed decision, and if anything are probably thinking more about how they can convince you to join them over another firm.
In 20 years I have never heard of a firm rescinding an offer while someone has been given time to decide on the offer or not.
If you wanted to be very cynical about it, there would be no real difference in a firm rescinding an offer even if you had accepted it. Technically they could do this as easily as if you were still deciding.
And before everyone’s paranoia kicks in, that doesn’t happen either. TC offers are not retracted post acceptance without there being some serious issues for the business (only time I have seen it happen since 2008 is when a firm has gone bust).
Thanks, Jessica! Really appreciate your response. I know it’s not rational, but I think after how intense and competitive the whole process has been, my brain’s still stuck in “what if it goes wrong?” mode.
It’s reassuring to hear that this kind of paranoia isn’t grounded in how firms actually operate, and your perspective definitely helps put things into context. 🫶
- Sep 7, 2024
- 1,006
- 1,246
Hi there,
Congrats on getting to that stage! Such a wonderful achievement.
One of the most important things to understand about law firm assessment centres is that how you prepare mentally often matters more than what you produce on the day. That might sound counterintuitive, but solid preparation puts you in a position where you're no longer scrambling for structure or ideas — you already know how to break down the task, filter out what matters, and get your points across under pressure. For case study-type tasks especially, people tend to get overwhelmed because there’s a lot of information and very little time. That’s where your prep really kicks in. If you’ve trained yourself to quickly identify what’s relevant and ignore the noise, you’ll automatically be more efficient and more confident when it counts.
When you’re given a time-limited task — let’s say 20 or 30 minutes — your first instinct might be to dive into the documents and start reading everything. But the smarter move is to stop and read the actual question or task instruction first. That tells you what you’re supposed to be solving. Once you know what you’re looking for, the rest of the reading becomes purposeful. You’re no longer reading just to understand — you’re reading to extract. You begin to actively look for the risks, issues, commercial angles or client concerns that relate to the task you’ve been set. That saves time and stops you from becoming overwhelmed by irrelevant detail.
If the task ends up being a memo — and often these pre-AC exercises are framed as an internal note or advice to a supervisor — formatting will matter too. Pay attention to structure, clarity and tone. Use headings to break up the content, write in plain English, and get to the point quickly. One piece of feedback candidates often get is that their writing is dense or difficult to follow. Making things easy to read is not about dumbing it down — it’s about being clear and professional. A good memo anticipates what the reader wants to know and delivers it in an accessible format. Also, remember to check how you're addressing the recipient. "Dear Name" or "To: Supervising Associate" is usually safe, and you can sign off with your name or "Trainee Solicitor" depending on the context you're being asked to adopt.
The last thing I’ll say is don’t stress if you’re unsure of the exact format beforehand. You can’t control that. But you can control how familiar you are with common tasks (like internal memos or client emails/case studies too), how well you manage your time under pressure, and how confident you are in identifying key issues quickly.
Best wishes on the AC. I just know you’re gonna nail it
- Sep 7, 2024
- 1,006
- 1,246
I‘m really sorry about this. I know how discouraging a rejection can feel, especially when it's from a firm you were genuinely excited about like Faegre. It’s completely normal to feel deflated after putting in so much effort and getting a “no” at the end. But let me say this clearly: this is not a reflection of your worth, potential, or ability to become a brilliant lawyer. Use this as a stepping stone. Reflect on what you learned, note what you’d improve for next time, and then move forward with intention. You’re not starting from scratch… you’re starting from experience. Keep applying, keep refining, and most importantly, keep backing yourself. There are still so many opportunities ahead, and you only need one "yes" to change everything.
You've got this.
- Sep 7, 2024
- 1,006
- 1,246
Hey!
So critical reasoning tests will usually be Watson Glaser or some variation of it. But it’s not just that. Firms sometimes include verbal reasoning or situational judgment tests (SJTs) as part of their critical thinking assessments too. All of them test how you process information, make judgments, and spot inconsistencies, so it’s worth being familiar with each type.
In terms of resources, there are loads online. I found the practice tools on Amberjack assessments, JobTestPrep, and AssessmentDay really helpful. They all offer mock tests that mirror the real thing quite well. That said, it's always best to go straight to the source when you can. For example, if you check Clifford Chance’s grad recruitment site, they’ve got a practice Watson Glaser that you can try out, and I’d definitely recommend giving it a go.
For group exercises, I don’t think there’s a ton you can actively prepare in advance. I’d say make the most of your group members opinions too - you’ll find working in a team is great as many people’s ideas help bolster the final outcome. 2 heads are better than 1. Also, what helps most is knowing what’s going on in the world. If you're familiar with pressing topics like ESG, US tariffs, AI developments, or anything similar, you’ll usually find a way to link them to whatever discussion you're given. Those aren’t the only topics, though, but the point is most of these exercises are testing how you think on your feet and apply commercial logic. M&A and private equity are also good areas to study, and there are loads of resources on TCLA for that — both on the forum and in the Premium or Gold content.
Let me know if you’ve got any other questions at all.
Thank you @Amma Usman !!☺️Hi there,
Congrats on getting to that stage! Such a wonderful achievement.
One of the most important things to understand about law firm assessment centres is that how you prepare mentally often matters more than what you produce on the day. That might sound counterintuitive, but solid preparation puts you in a position where you're no longer scrambling for structure or ideas — you already know how to break down the task, filter out what matters, and get your points across under pressure. For case study-type tasks especially, people tend to get overwhelmed because there’s a lot of information and very little time. That’s where your prep really kicks in. If you’ve trained yourself to quickly identify what’s relevant and ignore the noise, you’ll automatically be more efficient and more confident when it counts.
When you’re given a time-limited task — let’s say 20 or 30 minutes — your first instinct might be to dive into the documents and start reading everything. But the smarter move is to stop and read the actual question or task instruction first. That tells you what you’re supposed to be solving. Once you know what you’re looking for, the rest of the reading becomes purposeful. You’re no longer reading just to understand — you’re reading to extract. You begin to actively look for the risks, issues, commercial angles or client concerns that relate to the task you’ve been set. That saves time and stops you from becoming overwhelmed by irrelevant detail.
If the task ends up being a memo — and often these pre-AC exercises are framed as an internal note or advice to a supervisor — formatting will matter too. Pay attention to structure, clarity and tone. Use headings to break up the content, write in plain English, and get to the point quickly. One piece of feedback candidates often get is that their writing is dense or difficult to follow. Making things easy to read is not about dumbing it down — it’s about being clear and professional. A good memo anticipates what the reader wants to know and delivers it in an accessible format. Also, remember to check how you're addressing the recipient. "Dear Name" or "To: Supervising Associate" is usually safe, and you can sign off with your name or "Trainee Solicitor" depending on the context you're being asked to adopt.
The last thing I’ll say is don’t stress if you’re unsure of the exact format beforehand. You can’t control that. But you can control how familiar you are with common tasks (like internal memos or client emails/case studies too), how well you manage your time under pressure, and how confident you are in identifying key issues quickly.
Best wishes on the AC. I just know you’re gonna nail it
Jessica Booker
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
- Aug 1, 2019
- 15,427
- 21,536
Don’t worry - I have this question asked of me all the time, it’s very common to feel like this and to feel very nervous about it all!
That’s why I am here though to try and dispel this worries, especially when there is very little (or nothing) to worry about!
@Jessica Booker @Amma Usman
Heya! Can you please suggest a way to draft an email to a firm to extend the date of acceptance for a TC offer? I have another vac scheme in the summer, and I just got a TC offer from my spring vac scheme, but the contract stipulates that the last date to accept it is next week. A bit stressed since I don't want them to revoke the offer just because I asked for an extension.
Heya! Can you please suggest a way to draft an email to a firm to extend the date of acceptance for a TC offer? I have another vac scheme in the summer, and I just got a TC offer from my spring vac scheme, but the contract stipulates that the last date to accept it is next week. A bit stressed since I don't want them to revoke the offer just because I asked for an extension.
Jessica Booker
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
- Aug 1, 2019
- 15,427
- 21,536
I would recommend calling the firm rather than emailing for a matter like this. You'll be able to discuss the issue with them, emphasise your motivations for the firm much more clearly, and get a quicker answer than relying on email.
If you cannot get hold of the firm, then email and cover:
- Why you need the extension - be clear as to why, there is no point in trying to hide the other VS
- Ideally what date you would like the offer to be extended to
- Reiterate your motivations for the firm but explain why you are keen to explore your vacation scheme with the other firm.
They will not revoke the offer if you ask for an extension. The worst that will happen is they say no to the extension of the offer and only give you until next week to decide.
Unless there are any terms in your VS or TC offers that state otherwise, you could accept the TC offer anyway and continue with the VS offer. You also could always renege on the TC firm if you then secured a TC with the VS firm that you would prefer over the existing TC offer (assuming you haven't started any onboarding processes for the GDL/LPC/SQE or received any financial support (e.g. a maintenance grant payment) from the TC firm.
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Locked
- Sticky
- Sticky
