i think i did crap aswGuys I did so badly in Mishcon's amberjack. I legit have never gotten such a low score before WTF
i think i did crap aswGuys I did so badly in Mishcon's amberjack. I legit have never gotten such a low score before WTF
I haven’t done the test so I’m not sure exactly what it involves but it’s been called a verbal analysis test in past years, and it’s before interview/ACDoes anyone know what the KL Gates application process is?
It mentions online exercises, are these SJTs, WG, something else..? Also, unclear whether they take place at AC or before then.
Thanks!
Their loss!!!Akin PFO post TI. A bit disappointed cos I thought the TI went reasonably well.
I’m thinking it’s cos it went over by 20 mins. They said it should be 25 mins mine was 45…
I applied 15 Dec, sat the SJT and WG on 5 Jan, got the TI on 8 Jan and sat the TI 22 Jan.
Lowkey think Weil is gna be a PFO post AC. Oh well it is what it is on to the next I guess!
![]()
Sorry to hear this, it’s 100% their loss! Did they send you an email?Akin PFO post TI. A bit disappointed cos I thought the TI went reasonably well.
I’m thinking it’s cos it went over by 20 mins. They said it should be 25 mins mine was 45…
I applied 15 Dec, sat the SJT and WG on 5 Jan, got the TI on 8 Jan and sat the TI 22 Jan.
Lowkey think Weil is gna be a PFO post AC. Oh well it is what it is on to the next I guess!
![]()
Pardon my asking, but isn’t it usually a good sign if interviews run over time? Doesn’t it mean that they enjoy talking to the candidate?Akin PFO post TI. A bit disappointed cos I thought the TI went reasonably well.
I’m thinking it’s cos it went over by 20 mins. They said it should be 25 mins mine was 45…
I applied 15 Dec, sat the SJT and WG on 5 Jan, got the TI on 8 Jan and sat the TI 22 Jan.
Lowkey think Weil is gna be a PFO post AC. Oh well it is what it is on to the next I guess!
![]()
Thanks, hoping it isn’t Watson Glaser but it probably is isn’t itI haven’t done the test so I’m not sure exactly what it involves but it’s been called a verbal analysis test in past years, and it’s before interview/AC
Just found this, hope it helps! But it seems sort of like WG inferencesThanks, hoping it isn’t Watson Glaser but it probably is isn’t it![]()
Sorry to hear this, it’s 100% their loss! Did they send you an email?
Pardon my asking, but isn’t it usually a good sign if interviews run over time? Doesn’t it mean that they enjoy talking to the candidate?
I feel like if time had been an issue, they would have cut it short
A new velvetiser would make the application process go a lot smoother...got an email from Hotel Chocolat and had a jump scare hoping it was an update goshhh
‘An update to your new VIP rewards’got an email from Hotel Chocolat and had a jump scare hoping it was an update goshhh
I think it going over time isn't always a good thing, I wonder what you guys think but if it goes super over time maybe the answers weren't as concise as they wanted (not saying this is what Harvey did) just find it really interesting. Were they answering your questions a lot and having a conversation when you ran over or were they still asking questions? Sorry to hear about the pfo regardless.Yeah it was an email. It baso said the following:
Dear Harvey,
Many thanks for taking the time to speak with us during your recent telephone interview.
After careful consideration, unfortunately we are not able to progress your application on this occasion.
As you may appreciate, we receive an exceptionally high number of applications each year for a limited number of positions and our recruitment process is highly competitive. Due to the volume of applications that we receive, we are unable to offer feedback at this stage.
We were impressed with your performance and would like to encourage you to re-apply in the next recruitment cycle.
May we take this opportunity to thank you for your time and interest in Akin, and to wish you every success with your future legal career.
Many thanks
The Akin Graduate Recruitment Team
Idk tbh cos I’ve seen someone post they also got an Akin PFO post TI and theirs was 50 mins. I also saw @Shiv Lawy mention they felt it was more of a box ticking thing than anything, which I’d also felt too. Perhaps the grad rec team are nice so they didn’t want to cut the TI short. Oh well.