TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

[Maria56]

I didn’t, but I emailed the support team and they said they had received it.

When did y do stage 1 and receive 2 if you don’t mind me asking?

 

[Afraz Akhtar]

Are there any reasonable adjustment people ask for when completing the WG? I assume it’s pretty hard to accommodate given there’s no video element?

Hey @Wagamamas it depends on what you need exactly. Usually for this sort of test, people ask for extra time. If it's more of a visual need, then a different format for the assessment or an adjustment with regards the font/size of the question. It's pretty much a holistic conversation between you and graduate recruitment so that they can see if there are any changes they can make to the test to suit your needs and not vice versa.

 

[Donna Paulsen]

You can, but what good will it achieve? Either they find out and both applications get withdrawn OR they don't find out and one day whilst you're enjoying the lavish life that an NQ salary got you, you're listening to "Sweet Fantasy by Mariah Carey" as you're walking your way through the busy streets of Farringdon and BOOM you notice an email from the the graduate recruitment partner, they want to talk about your application from years ago and the SRA have been notified. You panic, thinking what could it have been.... did you mess up a client file, did you misplace funds, did you lie on an email? No, all you did was send in two applications but for the SRA this was it! The next thing you know, your face is plastered all over Legal Cheek, and you're dealing with a penalty/bar from service. Goodbye career, goodbye mortgage, goodbye all that wasted effort to draft amazing applications. People will be scouring LinkedIn to see if they can put a face to that name...

But.... it probably won't get that far, although it is tempting ATS's have duplication systems that compare applicants for plagiarism, and personal details are flagged within this check.

Me, knowing I have never done this, now panicking about the mere possibility that I somehow accidentally sent two applications and the SRA wants to end me:

 

[Winter]

What skills

You can, but what good will it achieve? Either they find out and both applications get withdrawn OR they don't find out and one day whilst you're enjoying the lavish life that an NQ salary got you, you're listening to "Sweet Fantasy by Mariah Carey" as you're walking your way through the busy streets of Farringdon and BOOM you notice an email from the the graduate recruitment partner, they want to talk about your application from years ago and the SRA have been notified. You panic, thinking what could it have been.... did you mess up a client file, did you misplace funds, did you lie on an email? No, all you did was send in two applications but for the SRA this was it! The next thing you know, your face is plastered all over Legal Cheek, and you're dealing with a penalty/bar from service. Goodbye career, goodbye mortgage, goodbye all that wasted effort to draft amazing applications. People will be scouring LinkedIn to see if they can put a face to that name...

But.... it probably won't get that far, although it is tempting ATS's have duplication systems that compare applicants for plagiarism, and personal details are flagged within this check.

I love this 😭😭 because this is the exact scenario that goes through my head everytime, like gosh, the stakes are so high in this field !

 

[Maria56]

Has anyone been seeing the amount of junior lawyers leaving to either go in-house or leaving big law altogether these past few days? Or maybe my LinkedIn algorithm is just biased lol. But it makes me wonder why... especially when I see people leaving the firms I'm currently fighting tooth and nail to get into lol.

Granted, it could just be their preference, a growing generational phenomenon, or wanting more of a work life balance etc., but it does make me worry that there might be something deeper...

Edit: and yes I know we tend to see more of these at this time of year since bonuses have been paid etc. but still makes me wonder haha

even liberty miles has quit her Big Law job; she was my favourite law tiktok influencer

 

[Lawyergyal123!]

Very random but i was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for good commercial law podcasts that are accessible to juniors.

I already listen to the basic ones like the FT and economist news briefing, i want something that breaks down the issues in a more commercial way to help me understand the importance of certain things, learn key terms, how it fits into the wider picture....etc.

I listened to two of the legal cheek ones today (LOVE legal cheek) and icl it was SO bad lol. There was one on the mergers of firms and one on some recent news stories they suggest we know, but the actual podcast wasnt helpful (again LOVE legal cheek and all the writers no hate to them).

So just wondering if anyone has any suggestions instead of these.

 

[Donna Paulsen]

even liberty miles has quit her Big Law job; she was my favourite law tiktok influencer

Real ones remember where they were when Eve Cornwell announced she's leaving law

 

[Novaa]

You can, but what good will it achieve? Either they find out and both applications get withdrawn OR they don't find out and one day whilst you're enjoying the lavish life that an NQ salary got you, you're listening to "Sweet Fantasy by Mariah Carey" as you're walking your way through the busy streets of Farringdon and BOOM you notice an email from the the graduate recruitment partner, they want to talk about your application from years ago and the SRA have been notified. You panic, thinking what could it have been.... did you mess up a client file, did you misplace funds, did you lie on an email? No, all you did was send in two applications but for the SRA this was it! The next thing you know, your face is plastered all over Legal Cheek, and you're dealing with a penalty/bar from service. Goodbye career, goodbye mortgage, goodbye all that wasted effort to draft amazing applications. People will be scouring LinkedIn to see if they can put a face to that name...

But.... it probably won't get that far, although it is tempting ATS's have duplication systems that compare applicants for plagiarism, and personal details are flagged within this check.

WAIT THIS STORYTELLING!! Okaaaay Author Afraz

 

[sunnysan]

Anyone know if Watson Farley Williams mind WFW in applications just to save word count? If so, is it 'WFWs' or 'WFW'?

Hi do you have any insight on the WFW video interview

 

[elle woods]

even liberty miles has quit her Big Law job; she was my favourite law tiktok influencer

i knowwww i saw on insta!! I was genuinely so shocked - but can't wait to see what she will be pursuing!

 

[James Wakefield]

I didn’t, but I emailed the support team and they said they had received it.

Thank you! I tried re-clicking the test link and it said I’d completed it so hope it’s ok!

Did anyone get a confirmation? Maybe there isn’t one! 🤷‍♂️

 

[sunnysan]

Does anyone have any insight into the Watson Farley Williams video interviews

 

[shadowboxer909]

Has anyone been seeing the amount of junior lawyers leaving to either go in-house or leaving big law altogether these past few days? Or maybe my LinkedIn algorithm is just biased lol. But it makes me wonder why... especially when I see people leaving the firms I'm currently fighting tooth and nail to get into lol.

Granted, it could just be their preference, a growing generational phenomenon, or wanting more of a work life balance etc., but it does make me worry that there might be something deeper...

Edit: and yes I know we tend to see more of these at this time of year since bonuses have been paid etc. but still makes me wonder haha

That's because some people don't like the stress of Big Law so feel in-house is less stressful, people want to try new things etc. People also get told by their firm to leave (if they're not going to make partner or they're not billing enough etc) so the next port of call is in-house. I know this is particularly the case for Kirkland where they make you a non-equity partner but if you can't build a book of business, they tell you to leave (and help you land in-house roles).

The billables model is also very difficult for some people. If you're not billing, it can be stressful and the allocation of work isn't always even. Partners/senior associates have favourites and so if you're not being given work, this can also be stressful. But I think this is more of a problem for junior lawyers in certain practices.

Most careers don't have a billables model where you have to seek work otherwise you're not going to have a job for long. I've been in a corporate role at investment firm where I used to go watch Netflix in between when I wasn't being given work and nobody cared as long as I indicated I had capacity. In a billables model, I don't think I could get away with that for long.

 

[oliviabeijing]

Hi do you have any insight on the WFW video interview

No haha I only submitted my app like 2 days ago.

 

[elle woods]

That's because some people don't like the stress of Big Law so feel in-house is less stressful, people want to try new things etc. People also get told by their firm to leave (if they're not going to make partner or they're not billing enough etc) so the next port of call is in-house. I know this is particularly the case for Kirkland where they make you a non-equity partner but if you can't build a book of business, they tell you to leave (and help you land in-house roles).

The billables model is also very difficult for some people. If you're not billing, it can be stressful and the allocation of work isn't always even. Partners/senior associates have favourites and so if you're not being given work, this can also be stressful. But I think this is more of a problem for junior lawyers in certain practices.

Most careers don't have a billables model where you have to seek work otherwise you're not going to have a job for long. I've been in a corporate role where I used to go watch Netflix in between when I wasn't being given work and nobody cared as long as I indicated I had capacity. In a billables model, I don't think I could get away with that for long.

oh wow... that does sound quite stressful!! Man, playing favourites is rough...I thought I was past the stage in life where favouritism existed lol

lots of food for thought here...guess we will just have to work harder after securing that training contract... But wow haha being able to watch Netflix in between sounds fun!

 

[oliviabeijing]

Hi do you have any insight on the WFW video interview

When did you get your invite?

 

[nicoledm]

any ACs for DLA manchester ?

 

[LARALRARATC]

Has anyone done VI for Baker Mckenzie? Happy to swap for Slaughter & May, Weil, CMS, Goodwin, Latham, Freshields and A&O Shearman!

 

[Harvey Specter]

You can, but what good will it achieve? Either they find out and both applications get withdrawn OR they don't find out and one day whilst you're enjoying the lavish life that an NQ salary got you, you're listening to "Sweet Fantasy by Mariah Carey" as you're walking your way through the busy streets of Farringdon and BOOM you notice an email from the the graduate recruitment partner, they want to talk about your application from years ago and the SRA have been notified. You panic, thinking what could it have been.... did you mess up a client file, did you misplace funds, did you lie on an email? No, all you did was send in two applications but for the SRA this was it! The next thing you know, your face is plastered all over Legal Cheek, and you're dealing with a penalty/bar from service. Goodbye career, goodbye mortgage, goodbye all that wasted effort to draft amazing applications. People will be scouring LinkedIn to see if they can put a face to that name...​

But.... it probably won't get that far, although it is tempting ATS's have duplication systems that compare applicants for plagiarism, and personal details are flagged within this check.

The SRA reading this knowing that they have a new group of people they can chase and destroy:

 

[Wagamamas]

Hey @Wagamamas it depends on what you need exactly. Usually for this sort of test, people ask for extra time. If it's more of a visual need, then a different format for the assessment or an adjustment with regards the font/size of the question. It's pretty much a holistic conversation between you and graduate recruitment so that they can see if there are any changes they can make to the test to suit your needs and not vice versa.

Thank you. Extra time.

Is 30 mins for 40 WG questions normal?