• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Shaky_Pete

Active Member
Oct 25, 2025
19
46
It's known as associate attrition. It's entirely normal and, from the law firm's point of view, vitally necessary as part of the business model. Law firms, like consulting firms and investment banks, run a pyramid or 'up or out' model. You only need about 5-10 individuals in a class of 80-100 trainees to make partner. The rest have to go. Either to another firm, because they want to leave big law, or because they don't make the cut.

Look at Slaughter and May. At a low around 15 years ago they only had 85 partners in London. Now they're at around 120. They allegedly recruit 90 trainees a year, but last year promoted only 6 new partners (and 5 the year before). You do the maths.

They hire so many trainees/associates because they want to ensure they maintain a partner:associate leverage at around 3 or 4 (i.e. 3-4 associates per partner) to maximise billing potential, and to do all the grunge work. It also helps MC firms because a huge number of former trainees and associates land roles in-house at corporates, banks and PE houses, making it more likely that they will award work to their former firm.

From the associate who's quitting's perspective, it's not that bad. Some in-house roles are highly sought after, high paying, career-enhancing moves (just look at how much tech GCs earn in the US). You may take a small pay cut, but there are other benefits. Cushy job. No pressure to bill. Hours are way better.

Also, it's not unheard of to see people returning from in-house roles to become law firm partners: cf Angharad Lewis, David Holdsworth, Kai Zeng, Jeremy Dennison.
Interested how firms get rid of associates to realise this - does it tend to be through formal redundancy or 'managing out'?
 

cookedlawstudent

Distinguished Member
Nov 10, 2025
68
52
Sorry to hear that 😞

Will likely be the same for me. Got ABC at A-level, 2.1 at undergraduate, Distinction for my LLM and 12 years experience in a demanding career but yes, let’s focus on exams I took when I was barely 18… 🤦🏻‍♂️

Same for WFW, which is a shame as I am really interested in the maritime sector!
I find it so frustrating at times, but I've just accepted that it's the way things go. I know that the people who have met the A-level requirements worked incredibly hard for it, so I get why they would want them over me. But at the same time, I feel like I've compensated for a poor performance when I was 18. Onto the next ig
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Harvey Specter

ADhillon01

Standard Member
Dec 9, 2025
7
23
For those who have attempted the Reed Smith VI- I know the VI is untimed, but I was wondering can I cross the screen off once I start the section and then come back to it later?? Would that reflect negatively on my application or is that acceptable?
Not sure about turning the camera on and off, but you have to complete it within "one sitting". So, if you turn your camera on and off and you are wearing different clothes in your following answers, or the daylight outside has turned to night in the background - I would assume that would reflect negatively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: solicitor_2028

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.