Interested how firms get rid of associates to realise this - does it tend to be through formal redundancy or 'managing out'?It's known as associate attrition. It's entirely normal and, from the law firm's point of view, vitally necessary as part of the business model. Law firms, like consulting firms and investment banks, run a pyramid or 'up or out' model. You only need about 5-10 individuals in a class of 80-100 trainees to make partner. The rest have to go. Either to another firm, because they want to leave big law, or because they don't make the cut.
Look at Slaughter and May. At a low around 15 years ago they only had 85 partners in London. Now they're at around 120. They allegedly recruit 90 trainees a year, but last year promoted only 6 new partners (and 5 the year before). You do the maths.
They hire so many trainees/associates because they want to ensure they maintain a partner:associate leverage at around 3 or 4 (i.e. 3-4 associates per partner) to maximise billing potential, and to do all the grunge work. It also helps MC firms because a huge number of former trainees and associates land roles in-house at corporates, banks and PE houses, making it more likely that they will award work to their former firm.
From the associate who's quitting's perspective, it's not that bad. Some in-house roles are highly sought after, high paying, career-enhancing moves (just look at how much tech GCs earn in the US). You may take a small pay cut, but there are other benefits. Cushy job. No pressure to bill. Hours are way better.
Also, it's not unheard of to see people returning from in-house roles to become law firm partners: cf Angharad Lewis, David Holdsworth, Kai Zeng, Jeremy Dennison.
i hope they send out more 😓😓Does we think Cooley will have finished alerting people of whether they have reached the WG stage? Or more tomorrow?
I find it so frustrating at times, but I've just accepted that it's the way things go. I know that the people who have met the A-level requirements worked incredibly hard for it, so I get why they would want them over me. But at the same time, I feel like I've compensated for a poor performance when I was 18. Onto the next igSorry to hear that 😞
Will likely be the same for me. Got ABC at A-level, 2.1 at undergraduate, Distinction for my LLM and 12 years experience in a demanding career but yes, let’s focus on exams I took when I was barely 18… 🤦🏻♂️
Same for WFW, which is a shame as I am really interested in the maritime sector!
Not sure about turning the camera on and off, but you have to complete it within "one sitting". So, if you turn your camera on and off and you are wearing different clothes in your following answers, or the daylight outside has turned to night in the background - I would assume that would reflect negatively.For those who have attempted the Reed Smith VI- I know the VI is untimed, but I was wondering can I cross the screen off once I start the section and then come back to it later?? Would that reflect negatively on my application or is that acceptable?
I got pfod long back after app stageHave post VI rejections gone out for White & Case yet? Asking because with how it went I would’ve expected a rejection by now
Honestly, its annoying. What stage of the application have you gotten to?Wonder when they’ll reply!!
Haven’t heard back since VI how about you?Honestly, its annoying. What stage of the application have you gotten to?
SameHaven’t heard back since VI how about you?