• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • What do Private Equity Lawyers Actually Do? (Ropes & Gray)
    Wednesday, 14 January 2026 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (UK) Hosted on Zoom
    Discover the high-stakes world of private equity and see how lawyers power multi-million-pound deals behind the scenes.
    Register Here →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

TheSaulGoodman

Star Member
  • Dec 3, 2025
    39
    65
    Has anyone hear back post VI for Clyde’s?

    Hoping this week brings VIs/WEs and ACs for us all
    Australia Fingers Crossed GIF by MasterChefAU
     

    elle woods

    Legendary Member
  • Dec 4, 2025
    551
    1,116
    “Unfortunately, at this stage in the recruitment process, we are unable to provide feedback.”

    But I thought all our VIs were manually reviewed, and if we didn’t meet the Amberjack, then isn’t that just a “You didn’t meet the benchmark”? LOL ANYWAYS

    Confused Thinking GIF

    fr I'm kinda annoyed cos at least they can tell me which part of the process I failed at? Like was it my test or was it my application or was it my VI??? 😂
     

    TS.Law

    Well-Known Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 6, 2022
    23
    20
    I just completed the critical thinking test for Milbank and the evaluation of arguments section had 5 options instead of the conventional 2 options. There were no instructions either it just went on to the next section and gave options Very Strong argument, strong arguments, fairly strong argument, fairly weak argument, weak argument and very weak argument. does anyone have an instruction sheet or guidelines for these? what constitutes a strong argument compared to very strong or fairly strong, and what constitutes a fairly weak argument and the difference between family weak and strong?
    Hi, I also struggled to find the right direction in these questions, and I am not sure if my approach has worked so far.
    I was researching this earlier and could not find anything specific to this. However, grabbing some related concepts here and there, I realised this is similar to the 6-step scale from Likert, which is that psychometric test also largely used by law firms (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree).
    In my @Milbank assessment, what I considered to mark a statement as very strong or strong etc, is a mix of persuasion strategies (logos, pathos and ethos) with the original Likert reasoning:
    • Very strong if I had an unquestionable clear and persuasive argument which could reasonably persuade ANY person/bystander. It address the problem with no objections.
    • Strong, for a quite clear argument with a valid point directly linked to the question, although some objections can be made.
    • Fairly strong, for a relevant argument which might have a point to be considered but lacks substantial judgement or some logic could address the issue
    • Fairly weak if I faced an understandable argument with grains of truth and could persuade those already inclined. However, it doesn't address the real problem from the question and appeals to emotion, values, and feelings (pathos) and doesn't bring any logic or fact to substantiate.
    • Weak, for a statement which is completely unpersuasive and/or unrelated to the question. Sometimes, these statements make us consider an adjacent problem rather than focus on the real one being asked.
    • Strongly weak: no logic and/or reasonable answer at all. Lacks facts, judgment, while trying to bridge this gap with manipulative/irrelevant emotion.
    Again, I don't know if it worked at all, but psychologically speaking, this gave me more confidence and a kind of direction during the assessment.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Afraz Akhtar

    radssss

    Legendary Member
    Aug 16, 2024
    501
    714
    Pretty sure the Clyde and co vi is automatic if someone meets the test benchmark? I only did the test on Saturday and got invited to vi today!

    If someone has insights, please please pm me and I can swap for various firms.

    Also has anyone given the vwv test? Email says it’s only 5 mins long which is unusual hahaha.
     

    TheSaulGoodman

    Star Member
  • Dec 3, 2025
    39
    65
    Pretty sure the Clyde and co vi is automatic if someone meets the test benchmark? I only did the test on Saturday and got invited to vi today!

    If someone has insights, please please pm me and I can swap for various firms.

    Also has anyone given the vwv test? Email says it’s only 5 mins long which is unusual hahaha.
    I think it is automatic which I find strange I’m assuming it’s because they had no work experience section on the main app. Still weird
     
    • Like
    Reactions: radssss

    ADhillon01

    Active Member
    Dec 9, 2025
    15
    28
    20 ques for critical reasoning - 4 ques per section.
    For sjt - 4 blocks - one for each core value, each block had 3 ranking ques and around 10 slider ques.

    SJT is untimed - take how much time u need.
    Reasoning is not timed but time taken to complete it will affect your score. I took around 25 mins.
    🐐 this helped big time

    Got my VI invite just now! Was literally falling asleep in that reasoning test but managed to speed run to the finish line and did it in about 18 mins after my flight ✈️ 🤣
     
    • 🏆
    • Love
    Reactions: TheSaulGoodman and radssss

    radssss

    Legendary Member
    Aug 16, 2024
    501
    714
    🐐 this helped big time

    Got my VI invite just now! Was literally falling asleep in that reasoning test but managed to speed run to the finish line and did it in about 18 mins after my flight ✈️ 🤣
    yayyy!! I’m so glad :)
    I’ve got my vi just now too (did test on Saturday) and it’s 40 mins long??? That is stressing me out so bad😭😭
     

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.