• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • Received a training contract offer? We're hiring. It's fully remote. Apply by 27 April 2026
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Let’s report them collectively and hopefully the admins will remove them!
I'm a bit confused by your reaction here, to be honest. There isn't any information to suggest this user is a scammer, other than not wanting to share their test scores.

Without more information, I don't think it's reasonable to come into the forum and call the user out for this.
 
I'm a bit confused by your reaction here, to be honest. There isn't any information to suggest this user is a scammer, other than not wanting to share their test scores.

Without more information, I don't think it's reasonable to come into the forum and call the user out for this.

Just to follow up on this, if any users have information, please feel free to send this to me privately and we can take any necessary actions.

But I don't think it's productive to publicly pile on to someone without more information.
 
I know, it’s beyond me why people would do this, probably out of boredom.

(After I asked them very politely and said it’d be no issue if they refused) They said they won’t share their test scores because they signed a confidentiality agreement but the firm said in the AC invite email they were top 0.5%😂 Having interacted with their grad rec very closely for the past years, I know for a fact that RS would never share this info. Tbh no firms would share this and especially not pre AC/interview, but I can confidently say this is clearly a lie about RS.
I have noticed some people do this as well claiming they have ACs or reacting to posts when it makes no sense with the firms timeline and when people ask about it they make it excuses. I have no idea why people do this. The only thing I can think of is it is their goal to make others stressed and upset or nervous. Luckily this is a veryy small minority and most people on the forum are helpful and honest.
 
Just to follow up on this, if any users have information, please feel free to send this to me privately and we can take any necessary actions.

But I don't think it's productive to publicly pile on to someone without more information.
Hi Jaysen,

Thank you for reaching out. I will send you a private message.

I posted about this user’s behaviour to warn others. Reed Smith is a firm some of us are currently very anxious to hear back from and the user tried to spread misinformation. This was the only reason for my public post, but I will remove it if you deem necessary.

Thank you in advance.
 
Hi Jaysen,

Thank you for reaching out. I will send you a private message.

I posted about this user’s behaviour to warn others. Reed Smith is a firm some of us are currently very anxious to hear back from and the user tried to spread misinformation. This was the only reason for my public post, but I will remove it if you deem necessary.

Thank you in advance.
what did they say about Reed sMITH?
 
Hi Jaysen,

Thank you for reaching out. I will send you a private message.

I posted about this user’s behaviour to warn others. Reed Smith is a firm some of us are currently very anxious to hear back from and the user tried to spread misinformation. This was the only reason for my public post, but I will remove it if you deem necessary.

Thank you in advance.
They have done this with other firms as well such as HFW
 
Does anyone know if Osborne Clarke's online verbal and deductive reasoning test timed?

yes you get 18 minutes for 12 deductive reasoning and 19 minutes for 10 sets of 3 true/false/cannot say verbal reasoning.

the verbal reasoning does not require any special preparation IMO (in general I think they are reasonably strict on the "can't say" if it does not follow truly logically based on the text, however) and the time limit is ample.

for the deductive reasoning the time limit is designed to cause maximum stress and make you fail due to poor time management. there are basically five question types:
  • schedule the meeting in your own calendar, which is easy and doesn't take the full time but if you have spent long on the other types you will needlessly lose marks by not picking up here;
  • schedule the meeting across multiple calendars, again easy marks;
  • allocate the people to the meeting rooms, which is again pretty easy;
  • rank the candidates one to six, which is a logic puzzle like the ones you can buy in newsagents basically, albeit the x✔ strategy doesn't necessarily work so more advanced techniques can be helpful;
  • the monthly scheduling is tough but probably you could pre-print calendars for each day-of-the-week or use a second screen/second computer to make this more effective.
If you go over about 2 or 2.5 minutes per question (and you could easily spend five or more) on the last two types you will end up failing due to time management.

There is only one, fixed practice test for dr but if you do the general test it will give you questions from the dr pool and you can just answer randomly for the ones that are using numerical reasoning and inductive reasoning to avoid wasting too much time.
 
Last edited:
Hi Jaysen,

Thank you for reaching out. I will send you a private message.

I posted about this user’s behaviour to warn others. Reed Smith is a firm some of us are currently very anxious to hear back from and the user tried to spread misinformation. This was the only reason for my public post, but I will remove it if you deem necessary.

Thank you in advance.
haha i know this is an immature addition to the convo but i think it's so funny they called u a Dorito. I didn't fully get it until i saw ur user
 
Just to follow up on this, if any users have information, please feel free to send this to me privately and we can take any necessary actions.

But I don't think it's productive to publicly pile on to someone without more information.
ngl their recent activity is just them dishing out thumbs up reactions to every firm posted. I'm surprised they've not said they have a freshfields DTC AC that would really get the forum bubbling
 
yes you get 18 minutes for 12 deductive reasoning and 19 minutes for 10 sets of 3 true/false/cannot say verbal reasoning.

the verbal reasoning does not require any special preparation IMO (in general I think they are reasonably strict on the "can't say" if it does not follow truly logically based on the text, however) and the time limit is ample.

for the deductive reasoning the time limit is designed to cause maximum stress and make you fail due to poor time management. there are basically four question types: schedule the meeting in your own calendar, which is easy and doesn't take the full time but if you have spent long on the other times you will needlessly lose marks by not picking up here; schedule the meeting across multiple calendars, again easy marks; allocate the people to the meeting rooms, which is again pretty easy; rank the candidates one to six, which is a logic puzzle like the ones you can buy in newsagents basically, albeit the x✔ strategy doesn't necessarily work so more advanced techniques can be helpful; the monthly scheduling is tough but probably you could pre-print calendars for each day-of-the-week or use a second screen/second computer to make this more effective.

There is only one, fixed practice test for dr but if you do the general test it will give you questions from the dr pool and you can just answer randomly for the ones that are using numerical reasoning and inductive reasoning.
Thank you!
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.