TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Status
Not open for further replies.
I swear some of these TikTok influencers give such conflicting advice. Some say to apply to loads of firms and some say to do 5 or 6? Idrk who to believe
Hey!

I agree with what several others have mentioned: there isn't really a single "right" application strategy that works for everyone. The best approach depends on your own circumstances, confidence levels, and how well you understand your interests at this stage.

For instance, when I applied last cycle, I cast quite a wide net. I wasn't completely sure which practice areas suited me, and as a non-Russell group student, I felt that applying broadly would help me maximise my chances. That approach worked well for me as it allowed me to explore a variety of firms without limiting myself too early.

However, a targeted strategy can be just as effective. If you already know which areas genuinely interest you, or you have relevant experience that aligns with particular firms, focusing your applications on a smaller group of firms can be a smart move. I've spoken to a few people that applied to only a handful of firms and were still successful - even someone who only applied to 3 and received 2 offers.

Ultimately, it comes down to what feels right to you. If you're unsure, there's no harm in starting with one approach and adjusting as you go. The application process gives you the chance to learn from your experiences, gain clarity, and fine-tune your strategy as your interests develop.

It can be tricky when people online say multiple things, but I would go with your gut :)
 
It’s a key factor in the entire assessment.
The Sjt is such a minor.

I had to do two written questions on my phone during my lunch break because I was told it was an sjt only.

A guaranteed rejection 🤝
Don't lose hope! In fact there were people who progressed to second stage and didn't expect the WE section. They didn't tailor the answer much and might even missed some grammar, syntax, or spelling.
 
Is it fair to say I am interested in both M&A and PE? I understand that for PE sponsor-sided transactions, there is a lot of overlap in the work (as PE firms acquire other companies). However, if I'm applying to a firm like Skadden, is it fair to say that I am attracted to both their M&A and PE capabilities?
I understand that for a public M&A transaction, things can be different. Most PE transactions are private/ if they are public, they tend to be take privates. I'm not precisely sure how a public M&A transaction will be different though other than the fact that there are listing rules/ takeover codes to be considered? Could someone explain what particularly a trainee does during a public M&A that is different to a private M&A transaction?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.