TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

[anonymousanon123]

Welcome new forum members 👀 - can we at least get some lovely introductions, if poss, so we can better direct our queries?

Hey! I’m a recent law graduate about to start the SQE. I have a training contract offer from Freshfields and previously received interviews from HSF, Milbank, and Trowers & Hamlins for their vac schemes (did not attend HSF though!). I also received a TC offer from Milbank after their vac scheme, as well as a vac scheme place at Trowers that I did not attend. Happy to help with any questions!

 

[anonymousanon123]

gosh I just did my Hogan Lovells test and found the video questions so hard and unnatural. I spoke about the topic of the third question in my second question so it felt a bit too repetitive too, though I did shift focus. I am usually a good speaker but it feels too artificial

Honestly, this is such a normal feeling. Those video questions feel soo unnatural at first, even if you’re usually a confident speaker. It really does get easier with practice. A big tip is to practice answering questions out loud on camera (even just on your phone) so you get used to talking to a screen rather than a person. Also, don’t worry too much about a bit of overlap between answers. I think assessors expect some repetition, and as long as you shift the angle clearly, that’s completely fine. The more you do these, the more natural and less “artificial” they start to feel, I promise. You’ve got this!

 

[TinnedFish]

Hiii, thanks for sharing your experience! Do you have any advice as to how to convert a vac?? And maybe what not to do, or any insight as to why people might not convert one? I’m super nervous for mine and not sure what to expect and how to act lol 😭

I’m a little scared that my written work/ tasks won’t be up to standard, or if I will know how to even approach the task in general (I guess the best approach is to clarify with the supervisor, but still)

I’ve done a one-week vac at a smaller firm but I wasn’t too nervous for it since it wasn’t convertible anyways and it was quite informal.

But since this vac is one with a much larger firm and one I really want, I’m just extra jittery! Any advice would be appreciated!!

Hi! I wanted to give my two cents on this as someone who has failed to convert 3 vac schemes 😭!

The biggest mistake I made and one that I've seen drag other top candidates down was confidence. You have to try your best to really put yourself out there and express how interested you are in the work and the firm. There were times where a task that my supervisor was doing was super fascinating to me but because I just quietly did what was assigned to me without voicing this interest, he assumed that I wasn't interested at all.

In terms of the written work/tasks, I did 4-5 forage vac schemes (theforage.com/simulations?careers=law) before my actual vac schemes and this was a really useful example of how lawyers structure and draft documents and I tried to mimic their language and style. This ended up working well for me as I usually performed on the work/tasks.

Lastly I would say to just enjoy the experience, make friends with all the other schemers and try to connect with the lawyers at the firm. Grad Rec can sense your energy and whether someone doesn't fit in with their cohort or the firm and will definitely take it into consideration. Also always be friendly and polite! (Someone on a scheme I attended was kicked off halfway through for making fun of someone's hairline😭)

 

[TinnedFish]

could anyone please advise on this please on understanding what a firm is looking for in their video interview process?
- Format: 3 mins to prep 90 seconds to respond
- Told we are being assessed on skills and competencies, and the VI email invite explicitly stated that the VI assesses 4 competencies
- But the firm's video advises us to focus just on how we would approach the situation - to not bring in past examples - but to also show your unique perspective and how we would approach the situation.
- am I correct in thinking that this is what the firm is saying: your skills/past experience is not directly assessed, only how you would approach the situation (which can be informed by past experiences, no matter what that encompassed and how much you have).
- but if everyone is saying similar things and making similar points, how would the firm distinguish between candidates (this is the final stage before the AC)?

If the firm has really said not to bring in past examples then you're probably right in that they are mainly assessing how you approach the situation. I'm sure that there will be differences in the points that each person makes and how they tackle the questions based on their own lived experiences. HOWEVER, if everyone does end up making similar points, the firm will likely distinguish candidates based on energy, confidence, and structure. So for example:

Did you make your points clearly and logically?
Did you stutter?
Did you sound passionate and excited?
Was your delivery & pronounciation strong?
Were you maintaning eye contact? (or camera contact I guess??)

These are definitely what I would make sure to have perfected before the VI!

 

[elle woods]

Hi! I wanted to give my two cents on this as someone who has failed to convert 3 vac schemes 😭!

The biggest mistake I made and one that I've seen drag other top candidates down was confidence. You have to try your best to really put yourself out there and express how interested you are in the work and the firm. There were times where a task that my supervisor was doing was super fascinating to me but because I just quietly did what was assigned to me without voicing this interest, he assumed that I wasn't interested at all.

In terms of the written work/tasks, I did 4-5 forage vac schemes (theforage.com/simulations?careers=law) before my actual vac schemes and this was a really useful example of how lawyers structure and draft documents and I tried to mimic their language and style. This ended up working well for me as I usually performed on the work/tasks.

Lastly I would say to just enjoy the experience, make friends with all the other schemers and try to connect with the lawyers at the firm. Grad Rec can sense your energy and whether someone doesn't fit in with their cohort or the firm and will definitely take it into consideration. Also always be friendly and polite! (Someone on a scheme I attended was kicked off halfway through for making fun of someone's hairline😭)

Thank you so so much! This is also super helpful!! And damn you should’ve seen my face when I read that last line 😂

What I struggle with is knowing if it’s okay to interrupt a partner if I’m interested in their work or if they’re too busy to want to discuss things with you 😭

Haha I guess the best way to go about it is just to be less nervous as it’s easier to be confident and curious when you’re not worrying about the small details (maybe?)

All the best!! Are you applying to DTC or VS’ this year? Or do you have a TC already? Best of luck either way and thanks again!

 

[yk1906]

Eversheds PFO

 

[TinnedFish]

Thank you so so much! This is also super helpful!! And damn you should’ve seen my face when I read that last line 😂

What I struggle with is knowing if it’s okay to interrupt a partner if I’m interested in their work or if they’re too busy to want to discuss things with you 😭

Haha I guess the best way to go about it is just to be less nervous as it’s easier to be confident and curious when you’re not worrying about the small details (maybe?)

All the best!! Are you applying to DTC or VS’ this year? Or do you have a TC already? Best of luck either way and thanks again!

Elle, you should've seen my face when they made that hair line comment to that poor paralegal😭

I had the same issue struggling with interrupting partners as they can have so much aura. What I did that seemed to work was when initially getting introduced to them by my supervisor, I would ask whether they were free for a coffee at the end of the day or tomorrow. I would then use that coffee chat to really get to know them and try to build rapport. After that, it became a lot less scary to ask them about their work.

On that note, I would say to always ask if you're interested as a closed mouth doesn't get fed. If you don't ask you definitely won't get anything from them but if you do ask there's always a chance they'll be happy to walk you through things. One time, I overheard a partner talking about a scheduled client negotiation over the phone, After his call ended I asked him about it and cheekily suggested that it would be a great learning opportunity for me if I could sit in and he actually ended up bringing me to the negotiation. I might've just been a piece of furniture during the discussion but it was a really interesting experience that I wouldn't have gotten if I hadn't asked!

I do already have a TC so feel free to ask any questions you have. Best of luck to you too!

 

[elle woods]

Sigh Mayer Brown Automatic Test invite 😭 would anyone have any insights into the VI please? Same with Weil tbh

 

[Rads]

Sigh Mayer Brown Automatic Test invite 😭 would anyone have any insights into the VI please? Same with Weil tbh

Same any insights would help!

 

[TinnedFish]

Any tips on how not to lose my mind over christmas knowing firms are going to be telling anyone anything until Jan🫠

Tbh I've just deleted gmail every christmas for the past 3 years. Out of sight out of mind!

 

[Madison Pinewall]

Sigh Mayer Brown Automatic Test invite 😭 would anyone have any insights into the VI please? Same with Weil tbh

The Mayer Brown test has a VI??

 

[elle woods]

Elle, you should've seen my face when they made that hair line comment to that poor paralegal😭

I had the same issue struggling with interrupting partners as they can have so much aura. What I did that seemed to work was when initially getting introduced to them by my supervisor, I would ask whether they were free for a coffee at the end of the day or tomorrow. I would then use that coffee chat to really get to know them and try to build rapport. After that, it became a lot less scary to ask them about their work.

On that note, I would say to always ask if you're interested as a closed mouth doesn't get fed. If you don't ask you definitely won't get anything from them but if you do ask there's always a chance they'll be happy to walk you through things. One time, I overheard a partner talking about a scheduled client negotiation over the phone, After his call ended I asked him about it and cheekily suggested that it would be a great learning opportunity for me if I could sit in and he actually ended up bringing me to the negotiation. I might've just been a piece of furniture during the discussion but it was a really interesting experience that I wouldn't have gotten if I hadn't asked!

I do already have a TC so feel free to ask any questions you have. Best of luck to you too!

poor thing hahah

Yess thank you for the above! Closed mouths don't get fed is sooo true. I love that haha, hopefully I'll be less stressed about the scheme when the time comes around so that I can just be myself and be a curious little social butterfly hahah

Oh wow well done on securing your TC!!

 

[TinnedFish]

Sigh Mayer Brown Automatic Test invite 😭 would anyone have any insights into the VI please? Same with Weil tbh

I haven't done the Mayer Brown test before but I have done the Weil one. Last year they sent a link in the email to a VI practice site. Definitely practice that as much as possible - I was using it to practice for other firms even after I'd finished the Weil VI.

Weil's questions tend to be a lot more motivational and commercial so make sure to brush up on your commercial awareness beforehand!

 

[elle woods]

The Mayer Brown test has a VI??

yea 😭

 

[elle woods]

I haven't done the Mayer Brown test before but I have done the Weil one. Last year they sent a link in the email to a VI practice site. Definitely practice that as much as possible - I was using it to practice for other firms even after I'd finished the Weil VI.

Weil's questions tend to be a lot more motivational and commercial so make sure to brush up on your commercial awareness beforehand!

Thank you! By commercial, do you mean like the typical commercial questions, or were the questions more bespoke or required wider wider commercial awareness like at an AC?

 

[LawAspirer]

Did anybody get to next stage with Eversheds?

 

[Rads]

Hello, I am struggling with VIs. I am unsure if that has been covered, but can someone help me with how to do better and practice?

 

[nbjani]

Hi all just had my DLA interview. Don’t want to give too much away but I think it’s fair to say not to worry too much, all of the questions were fair enough, nothing to stump you. Just be clear with your motivations and self awareness.

 

[fayfayk]

If your written application was successful in the last cycle and the questions are the same, can you submit same application but with a few changes?

Hey! This is a really sensible thing to be thinking about.

If your written application was successful last cycle and the questions are exactly the same, it’s generally fine to reuse the core structure of your answers. That said, I wouldn’t recommend submitting it word-for-word with only very minor tweaks.

Firms do keep records from previous cycles, and even where they don’t do a line-by-line comparison, they’ll expect to see some progression. Ideally, you want to reflect what’s changed since you last applied, whether that’s new experience, clearer motivation for the firm, or a more developed understanding of the work and the market.

So in short, reusing the foundation is okay, but make sure the final application feels current and specific to this round rather than a resubmission of last year’s work.

 

[LawAspirer]

Hey there!

This is a really sensible thing to be thinking about.

If your written application was successful last cycle and the questions are exactly the same, it’s generally fine to reuse the core structure of your answers. That said, I wouldn’t recommend submitting it word-for-word with only very minor tweaks.

Firms do keep records from previous cycles, and even where they don’t do a line-by-line comparison, they’ll expect to see some progression. Ideally, you want to reflect what’s changed since you last applied, whether that’s new experience, clearer motivation for the firm, or a more developed understanding of the work and the market.

So in short, reusing the foundation is okay, but make sure the final application feels intentional, current and specific to this round rather than a resubmission of last year’s work.

Wtf is with all this AI content