what were the questions they asked?Just received Kirkland VI invite, anyone else heard back yet?
what were the questions they asked?Just received Kirkland VI invite, anyone else heard back yet?
I wouldn’t be too fast to assume, esp since their deadline was so close to Christmas - they might’ve not had the time to review every application yet…perhapsIs it safe to assume that if you haven’t heard back from Kirkland it’s a PFO?
Not sure if this will apply this cycle, but last cycle VI release was staggered!Anyone not heard back from Goodwin? Likely PFO?
I didn’t realise there was an option to pick spring or summer?😭 it was just ‘Vacation Scheme 2026’ for meI wouldn’t be too fast to assume, esp since their deadline was so close to Christmas - they might’ve not had the time to review every application yet…perhaps
Also maybe it depends on if you applied for spring or summer?
Last year they were sending VIs till early Jan for VS and early Feb for DTC.Is it safe to assume that if you haven’t heard back from Kirkland it’s a PFO?
I’m very far behind personally, 15Just out of interest, how many firms has everyone applied to?
Just out of interest, how many firms has everyone applied to?
Oh I’m not sure then lmaooo I thought there was but I may be mixing it up with another firm sorry!I didn’t realise there was an option to pick spring or summer?😭 it was just ‘Vacation Scheme 2026’ for me
14 so far, aiming to do 10-15 more😬 feeling v behindJust out of interest, how many firms has everyone applied to?
13 for me- planning to do maybe 1 or 2 more. The whole process is so exhausting i think my quality would just go down if i did anymore. Out of the 13 i have 4 that are my top choicesJust out of interest, how many firms has everyone applied to?
Oh damn, okay that’s useful. I guess patience really is a virtue in this game of application. Thank you!Last year they were sending VIs till early Jan for VS and early Feb for DTC.
Don’t worry it will come
Hello!Hi, does anyone have any advice for the PwC virtual AC 🥹 This is my very first AC so any help or insight would be very appreciated!
Hello!
Huge congratulations on getting an invite - that's a great achievement, especially in your first cycle!
Case studies are usually designed to test your commercial awareness, logical reasoning, and ability to interpret financial information. Whilst I haven't completed the case study interview at A&O Shearman, here are a few general tips:
There are also some amazing resources on TCLA that I used when I was preparing for the AC that resulted in my TC, so I would absolutely check these out as they were a lifesaver:
- Get comfortable with basic financial concepts: as you mentioned, I would have a look at thinks such as revenue vs. profit, market share, valuation, interest rates, and how macroeconomic factors can impact businesses. I would recommend sites such as Investopedia, as this is what I used when trying to digest all of the basic financial concepts for commercial awareness.
- Practice breaking down information / data logically: you might be given a short brief and asked to make recommendations or discuss implications. Focus on structuring your thoughts clearly - identify the key issue, explain the relevant factors, and conclude with a reasoned judgment. There won't necessarily be one 'right' answer, however, you should make sure to show your thought process and be able to defend your stance if questioned (although make sure you are also flexible if it is an aspect that you hadn't thought of!).
- Stay calm under time pressure: it can feel very overwhelming to be handed a bundle of documents and know that you have to go through it all under the time limit. I would start by reading through all of the documents, and then go back over and start highlighting the important parts and areas that you would want more information. They're more interested in how you think and communicate than whether your answer is 'right'.
- Brush up on A&O Shearman's key practice areas: if this is a finance-based case study, make sure to have a look at their finance, M&A, and restructuring teams. Have a look at recent deals, and see if you can link these to your reasoning in the case study.
- Practice: if you have time before your AC, I would try a few practice case studies online just to get used to analysing data quickly.
- Structure: I would go into the case study interview with a clear structure of how you have analysed the brief and what your conclusions are. How you want to structure this is completely personal to you, but I would make sure that you have a rough idea so that you can go into the interview and discuss all the most important points without missing something out. Some case study interviews have set questions, whilst others will be a conversation on the brief, but going in with a rough idea is a great way to prepare yourself and manage nerves.
Overall, I would treat it as a conversation where they're assessing how you approach problems. If you show curiosity, commercial reasoning, and an open-mind - you'll do great!
Wishing you the best of luck, and I'm sure you'll smash it![]()
Of course, no problem at all!!
Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:
Understand the Purpose and Audience
Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.
For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.
Use a Clear and Logical Structure
The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:
- Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
- Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
- Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.
Keep your tone professional and approachable
I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.
Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!
Be precise and client-focused
Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".
Check for clarity and tone at the end
Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.
As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.
I hope that helps!
Hello!
Congratulations on being invited to an assessment centre with A&O - that's a fantastic achievement! 🎊 Whilst I haven't participated in an assessment centre at A&O specifically, I can share some more general advice and tips for assessment centres. From what I've found online, I can see that it includes: a case study interview, a scenario-based interview, and a Q&A session with trainees.
Partner Case Study Interview
For the Partner case study interview, the key is to show structure and clarity in your answers and reasoning. As you have 40 minutes of prep time, I'd focus on:
When you discuss your answers with the Partner, be confident explaining your reasoning but be prepared for them to challenge. It's completely fine to stick to what you originally stated if you can expand on your reasons, but also be open to altering your viewpoint if they bring up a point that you hadn't considered. They're more interested in how you think, rather than whether you're necessarily "right" or "wrong".
- Understanding the client's objectives and challenges: the main thing that you want to consider is what is the client actually asking for? What is their main goal, and what are the main elements that are likely to impact their business that they will want you to take into account?
- Prioritise the key issues: linked to the above, make sure that you use your time well and focus on the main and most important issues. If you can't cover absolutely everything, make sure to focus on those main areas.
- Structuring your answers logically: if you can show your thought process for each decision or recommendation, this will help the Partner follow along. This could be along the lines of - background -> issues -> analysis -> recommendation.
- Considering commercial impact: remember that as a commercial lawyer, you will also have to factor in the wider commercial impact of any legal advice you give. Think about how you can give the best advice to the client, whilst also safeguarding their business.
I've also linked a previous post that I made on case study interviews - there are some really useful resources within it (particularly Jacob Miller's post!), so it's definitely worth checking that out
Scenario-Based Interview
This is designed to test how you think on your feet and respond to real-world situations that trainees might face. You don't necessarily need to know any black-letter law - it's more about your judgment, communication skills, and overall approach. A few things I would consider before the task:
- Pause and structure your thoughts: take a moment to think through the situation in your head and come up with a structure. This avoids you jumping straight into the answer and rambling (which I've definitely been guilty of in the past!) and allows you to clearly talk them through each step you would take.
- Clarify assumptions: if anything seems uncertain, make sure to show that you would clarify this. For example: if you're asked how you'd handle a client who's unhappy with advice, you could say something such as: "Before deciding how to respond, I'd want to understand whether the client is unhappy with the outcome itself, the way it was communicated, or the time it took to deliver. Can I assume the issue is about the advice itself?". This shows that you don't jump to conclusions, and demonstrates clear analytical and communication skills.
- Explain your reasoning step by step: the interviewer wants to understand how you reach decisions, not just what your decisions are. This is why a structure is particularly helpful - talk the interviewer through why you would approach each aspect that way.
- Balance professional and commercial considerations: this is something that most commercial firms (and A&O) will place a lot of emphasis on. As a commercial lawyer, you're not just there to give the "legally correct" answer, but also one that makes sense for the client's business objectives. The best responses show that you can think like a business advisor whilst maintaining professional integrity and protecting their legal interests.
- Use the STAR method: I would use the STAR method if you are describing past experiences. However, for hypothetical scenarios, I'd focus on: identifying the key issue(s), outlining possible approaches, and explaining why you'd choose one over another.
Q&A Session with Trainees
Whilst I haven't encountered an exercise in this format before (so I'm not too sure on what they'd be assessing - or if it is even assessed!), I can imagine this is likely to be more relaxed and conversational. It's your opportunity to get a real feel for what life is like at A&O. The trainees might not necessarily be assessing you, but you'll still make an impression through the quality of your questions and curiosity. I would:
Most importantly - stay calm, be yourself, and treat the day as a genuine opportunity to learn more about the firm and see if it is a good fit for you! They already know that you're capable, and they're now assessing how you think and communicate to see that you're a good fit!
- Prepare 2-3 genuine questions that show insight and interest, and make sure they are tailored to you. This could be by linking them to your previous experiences, or by asking questions to see that the firm is a good fit for your long-term career goals.
- Avoid overly generic or factual questions - if you can find the answer on the website, I definitely would not ask it at a firm event!
- Show enthusiasm and openness, and try to come across as friendly, approachable and engaged. If they have mentioned something that you find interesting or relatable, strike up a conversation (depending on the setting) and express your enthusiasm.
- Be yourself! It's very cliche advice, but this part of the assessment is also about fit and curiosity, not performance.
Wishing you the best of luck - you've got this! 💪
Hello!Guys, is it bad to have my window blinds visible in a video interview? I've tried positioning my laptop pretty much all around my room, but can't get a clear background