I received one this morning and got the VI invite in the eveningDid you also receive a feedback report this morning? I did and I'm trying to figure out if it was sent instead of a rejection lol
Of course scenario based interviews are ideal, just unfeasible to conduct on the scale of applications. Even using junior associates, let alone partners, is impossible until the candidates are filtered from thousands to a couple hundred or so. The tests exist to cut a large % of candidates to a manageable candidates. Even to read the application forms is time consuming, and really grades aren't a good differentiator amoungst a field of strong academic candidates. If I could wish for any test, no matter the feasibility of assigning a test, then of course I wouldn't wish for a WG. But feasibility / and ease of testing is important to firms when considering tests.Realistically, if we wanted a fully objective test it would be a typical Cattell-Horn-Carroll type IQ test, but no law firm is stupid enough to do that. I think a scenario based interview where one guides the interviewer through their thought process (law or not) is the most objective way to actually test critical thinking. There is no handrails, no prep time just you and two partners and a scenario and you need to answer it in the moment.
Would love some recommendations!
Yea, I would still wear a suit (especially men).what would you wear to this?
- Group Task: You’ll participate in a group activity and presentation (no preparation needed; instructions will be provided on the day).
- Mini "Speed" Interview: You’ll have an informal chat with an assessor lasting 10-15 minutes. Make the most of this opportunity to share about yourself!
- Q&A Session: I’ll be available for any questions you have about the firm or the process.
Dress Code: Smart casual is perfect; no need for a suit.
I'm thinking suit, right?
Agreed fully hate themThere was a whole discussion about this a few days ago (maybe last week) and I agree. But maybe I am also biased cause I just hate them lol.
it's for Walker Morris - someone else got one in the thread today also.Yea, I would still wear a suit (especially men).
I don’t think something like a quarter zipper and a shirt under with pants would hurt tho!
Also this ac sounds pretty interesting! Which firm is this for?
is this for walker morris? I got the same email and have no idea what to go for if a suit is too far lolwhat would you wear to this?
- Group Task: You’ll participate in a group activity and presentation (no preparation needed; instructions will be provided on the day).
- Mini "Speed" Interview: You’ll have an informal chat with an assessor lasting 10-15 minutes. Make the most of this opportunity to share about yourself!
- Q&A Session: I’ll be available for any questions you have about the firm or the process.
Dress Code: Smart casual is perfect; no need for a suit.
I'm thinking suit, right?
Congratulations!! Ace itit's for Walker Morris - someone else got one in the thread today also.
it doesn't ! just SJT and critical thinking I believeDoes anyone know if the Shoosmiths sjt has a vi?
Thank you!!it doesn't ! just SJT and critical thinking I believe
Respectfully, this is a terrible way of testing candidates for training contracts.I mean any sort of critical thinking, numerical reasoning, deductive reasoning, error checking tests etc are pretty objective.
If I were running a recruitment process for example, I'd have an application form with 0 questions.
Automatically allocated test (based on grade requirements) with WG+ deductive reasoning + numerical reasoning.
Automatic timed long answer question test based on passing benchmark - I'd have 4 questions randomly allocated from a question bank of 40 questions (10 questions per type). I'd publish all questions online so that nobody would have an unfair advantage from communicating with people who took the test.
Then AC.
Of course, no process can be completely objective, but I still think SJTs are a non-evidence based way to thin out applicants. (Of course, you could argue that people who practice and research SJTs deserve to do better on average, and to an extent I agree)
thanks !Yes, someone emailed and got a response - early Feb.
Read more. Write notes. Then read even more.just wondering how you guys keep track of commercial news and more so retain it effectively. for instance, those who have a watsons daily subscription, how do you guys make the most of it? I try to read it on and off but I don't think that's as effective as I do not retain everything I read. any tips would be appreciated!
The same exact result, I really tried to think loads this time asw as I really like MDR..I get higher results when I don’t actually try to guess what the test wants, just a shameI am actually so done with Amberjack, felt so confident about my MDR test only to get 6,3,3,7 on the pillars. I always get high verbal and numerical intellect in all of these but why is it impossible for me to get these pillars right m