Agreed fully hate them 💀There was a whole discussion about this a few days ago (maybe last week) and I agree. But maybe I am also biased cause I just hate them lol.
Agreed fully hate them 💀There was a whole discussion about this a few days ago (maybe last week) and I agree. But maybe I am also biased cause I just hate them lol.
it's for Walker Morris - someone else got one in the thread today also.Yea, I would still wear a suit (especially men).
I don’t think something like a quarter zipper and a shirt under with pants would hurt tho!
Also this ac sounds pretty interesting! Which firm is this for?
is this for walker morris? I got the same email and have no idea what to go for if a suit is too far lolwhat would you wear to this?
- Group Task: You’ll participate in a group activity and presentation (no preparation needed; instructions will be provided on the day).
- Mini "Speed" Interview: You’ll have an informal chat with an assessor lasting 10-15 minutes. Make the most of this opportunity to share about yourself!
- Q&A Session: I’ll be available for any questions you have about the firm or the process.
Dress Code: Smart casual is perfect; no need for a suit.
I'm thinking suit, right?
Congratulations!! Ace itit's for Walker Morris - someone else got one in the thread today also.
it doesn't ! just SJT and critical thinking I believeDoes anyone know if the Shoosmiths sjt has a vi?
Thank you!!it doesn't ! just SJT and critical thinking I believe
Respectfully, this is a terrible way of testing candidates for training contracts.I mean any sort of critical thinking, numerical reasoning, deductive reasoning, error checking tests etc are pretty objective.
If I were running a recruitment process for example, I'd have an application form with 0 questions.
Automatically allocated test (based on grade requirements) with WG+ deductive reasoning + numerical reasoning.
Automatic timed long answer question test based on passing benchmark - I'd have 4 questions randomly allocated from a question bank of 40 questions (10 questions per type). I'd publish all questions online so that nobody would have an unfair advantage from communicating with people who took the test.
Then AC.
Of course, no process can be completely objective, but I still think SJTs are a non-evidence based way to thin out applicants. (Of course, you could argue that people who practice and research SJTs deserve to do better on average, and to an extent I agree)
thanks !Yes, someone emailed and got a response - early Feb.
Read more. Write notes. Then read even more.just wondering how you guys keep track of commercial news and more so retain it effectively. for instance, those who have a watsons daily subscription, how do you guys make the most of it? I try to read it on and off but I don't think that's as effective as I do not retain everything I read. any tips would be appreciated!
The same exact result, I really tried to think loads this time asw as I really like MDR..I get higher results when I don’t actually try to guess what the test wants, just a shameI am actually so done with Amberjack, felt so confident about my MDR test only to get 6,3,3,7 on the pillars. I always get high verbal and numerical intellect in all of these but why is it impossible for me to get these pillars right m
I wouldnt mind some recommendations too. tbh I very much prefer SJTs, mainly because I find them a lot easier than WG. I feel like at times there are right/wrong answers for SJTs in a similar way to WG. Also I believe SJTs relate a lot more to the type of tasks you would be doing in law than knowing whether something is an assumption or not. Then again this is a biased view, but would love to understand your take more.Of course scenario based interviews are ideal, just unfeasible to conduct on the scale of applications. Even using junior associates, let alone partners, is impossible until the candidates are filtered from thousands to a couple hundred or so. The tests exist to cut a large % of candidates to a manageable candidates. Even to read the application forms is time consuming, and really grades aren't a good differentiator amoungst a field of strong academic candidates. If I could wish for any test, no matter the feasibility of assigning a test, then of course I wouldn't wish for a WG. But feasibility / and ease of testing is important to firms when considering tests.
The SJT imo is the least good test option to do that. I still think the best (that I have taken) are the Osborne Clarke Verbal & deductive tests (and I'll still say that even if I get rejected from the tests).
Will DM you tomorrow! Also have some PDFs that might be helpful