Any general advice on written exercises (online)? Or any examples or practice ones people found useful, thank you!
Hi! I have included some links to past threads that discuss written exercises in a lot of detail.
A lot of this is included in those threads, but to add on and summarise:
STRUCTURE:
Pay attention to how they ask you to present your work (as an email? memo? with headings? in bullet points? etc.)
If it’s an email, add the
Date, Subject, ‘Dear X’, ‘Kind regards, Y’ etc. If it’s appropriate, I might say something like
‘I’m writing to confirm that I have safely received x documents and to answer your questions on x’.
If it’s a memo, I like to start with ‘
You asked me to … xxx’ (summary of the instructions / questions I was given).
Even if they give no specific structure, I like to use numbered headings (e.g.
‘1. Executive Summary’, ‘refer to ‘2. Legal Issues in Australia’). I would always include a
‘1. Executive Summary’ at the beginning, stating my answers to all questions and explaining that I will elaborate below, and a
‘#. Next Steps’ section at the end (I discuss this under ‘CONTENT’).
You can use bullet points (but still write in full sentences) or prose, but either way, avoid long blocks of text. Use concise language and minimal technical jargon. Try to stay as succinct and easy to read as possible!
TYPING:
This sounds silly, but practice touch typing beforehand!
If you’re completing the assessment online at home, make sure you have stable Internet and that your Word, Google, Safari, pdf, etc. are all working.
If you’re completing the assessment at their office, be prepared to type with an unfamiliar device (Windows laptop, keyboard, etc.) It’s just good to mentally prepare yourself so you’re not thrown off

Also practice with background noise if you can, since it can be distracting hearing other candidates typing while you’re working.
TIMING:
Practice timed! Most firms will give 45 - 60 minutes, though this can differ. It is good to ask Grad Rec beforehand so you have an idea! Be prepared to work under time pressure. Don’t worry - it’s stressful for everyone, and sometimes it’s okay if you don’t have time to go through every issue or say everything you want to. If you need extra time, definitely let Grad Rec know beforehand!
I like to take the first 10 - 15 mins (depending on your total time) to carefully read through the instructions and background material, taking notes either on paper or in the answer box on the computer. I then like to take the next 20 - 30 mins to decide on my key issues and write my answer, then leave 5 mins to review. Firms tend to be very strict on SPAG errors, so make sure you leave time to proofread.
CONTENT:
This is tricky, as it will depend on the background materials you are given. You could be asked to write on an M&A case study, a piece of employment legislation, a loan agreement, or potentially even something non commercial law related. Use a range of practice materials to prepare for all scenarios.
Some people like to use frameworks (
PESTLE - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental implications). Some like to link in external commercial news stories and explain how this might affect the given client / situation.
E.g. If the materials ask whether the client should use debt or equity financing, it might be good to bring in recent interest rate updates and explain how that could affect the client’s decision. For some of my written exercises, I did neither, as I thought it was more appropriate to focus on the facts that were given. It is up to you!
Try to think from the point of view of a trainee / lawyer.
For example, if the background materials mention other jurisdictions, under ‘
#. NEXT STEPS’, you might want to add that you should ‘
contact local counsel / overseas offices for their advice’. Some firms have specific alliances / regional practice groups! Make sure you research this beforehand, as you are often not allowed to switch tabs / Google during the AC.
If the background materials mention a certain contract or a new piece of legislation that affects contracts (
e.g. employment contracts), you might want to mention that ‘
we should ask the client to send over x contracts, so we can update them or check if there are issues’.
Are we missing any material? Do we need to ask the client a question?
E.g. If the case study mentions that a M&A target is being sued by a customer, I might say that we should ask the client if they have any records of the incident, if they have any evidence that could be used to rebut the allegation, if they have communicated with the customer, etc. Do we need to do further research? If so, I might say ‘
I am happy to look into this and get back to you later today if needed’. Or if it concerns a different practice area, ‘
we may need the Tax team to look into x’.
PRACTICE:
Practice on Word Docs or blank text boxes with spell check turned off (some firms allow you to use it, some firms don’t, but it’s good to be prepared either way).
You can ask Grad Rec which particular skills are being assessed and scored, complete some practice assessments, then ask an AI to review your application and score you against the criteria as if they were an Associate / Partner at x firm.
If you are running out of materials, you can also try prompting an AI to generate some. This is one that I used. It may not be relevant for every firm / written exercise, but I found it worked relatively well for me, and you can tweak it accordingly!
__
Role: You are a senior associate at a City law firm who designs assessment exercises for graduate recruitment.
Task: Create a realistic mock written exercise for X’s [training contract / vacation scheme] assessment. It will be used to assess xx [e.g. analytical skills, written communication, attention to detail].
Format of the real exercise:
- Candidates receive a passage of about XX words on a commercial law topic or recent commercial law development.
- They must draft an email to a Partner or client that summarises the passage, identifies key issues, and/or answers specific questions about it.
- They have XX minutes under time pressure, with no external research.
- Candidates are assumed to have no legal background, so the passage must be fully understandable without prior legal knowledge. Define or explain any legal terms in plain English within the passage.
Topic requirements:
- Choose a niche or recent commercial law development that most candidates, including law graduates, are unlikely to have studied or heard of. Avoid core law-degree topics (contract formation, negligence, trusts, company law basics, Salomon, etc.) and heavily covered news topics (GDPR, Brexit, AI regulation headlines, etc.).
- Use web search to identify a genuine recent development (last 12 months) in UK or international commercial law. If you use a real development, make sure it is accurately described. If you adapt or fictionalise facts, tell me clearly which parts are invented.
- Give the scenario commercial context (a named client, a business decision, a deadline or commercial risk) so there is something to advise on.
Passage requirements:
- XX words, written in the style of a law firm briefing or news article.
- Include 4–6 key issues of varying importance, at least one subtle risk or implication that is not stated outright, and one or two details that are not relevant (red herrings), so candidates have to prioritise.
- Include a few specific facts (dates, figures, thresholds) so attention to detail can be tested.
Candidate instructions:
- Write as a realistic instruction from a Partner (about 100–150 words), with a specific scenario and 2–3 specific questions or requirements.
- State the audience (Partner or client) and the word limit for the email (e.g. 400–500 words).
- Make the task testable on the stated skills.
Output structure:
- First give me only the candidate pack (passage and instructions), so I can attempt it under timed conditions without seeing the answers.
- Then wait. When I reply "reveal", give me the marker's guide: key issues (ranked by importance), the hidden or subtle issues, the red herrings, what a strong email looks like (tone, structure, length, call to action), common mistakes, and a model answer of about 400 words.
- After I submit my attempt, give feedback against the stated skills with a score out of 10 per skill.