• TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Spring & Summer Vacation Scheme Thread 2026

Hi all, I have a solo presentation on the last day of my upcoming vacation scheme. The brief is to cover the practice area I've been placed in — specifically the legal and commercial challenges it's currently facing. We're allowed slides, it's strictly 5 minutes, and partners will be asking follow-up questions afterwards.

Would love to hear from anyone who's done something similar — particularly on how to structure it given the time constraint, how many slides feels right, and how best to prepare for the Q&A. Any tips from people who've been through vac schemes recently would be really appreciated!
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi all, I have a solo presentation on the last day of my upcoming vacation scheme. The brief is to cover the practice area I've been placed in — specifically the legal and commercial challenges it's currently facing. We're allowed slides, it's strictly 5 minutes, and partners will be asking follow-up questions afterwards.

Would love to hear from anyone who's done something similar — particularly on how to structure it given the time constraint, how many slides feels right, and how best to prepare for the Q&A. Any tips from people who've been through vac schemes recently would be really appreciated!
Hello!

I haven't done this type of presentation myself, so others who have been through a similar vacation scheme exercise may be able to give more specific advice. However, from a general presentation perspective, I'd be inclined to keep the structure fairly simple given the five-minute time limit.

For example, you could briefly introduce the practice area, identify two or three key legal or commercial challenges it is currently facing, and then spend the majority of your time analysing why those challenges matter for clients and the firm. It usually helps to focus more on depth, rather than trying to cover too many issues in such a short amount of time. You could then end with a short conclusion that pulls the points together and briefly highlight why these challenges are particularly significant or what they might mean going forward.

In terms of slides, my instinct would be that fewer is better for a five-minute presentation - perhaps around 4-6 slides, depending on how much detail you are including and how many issues you are discussing. The slides should support your points and give prompts of the most important information, rather than contain everything you plan to say.

For the Q&A, I'd make sure you understand the wider context behind each challenge that you have chosen and think about potential follow-up questions beforehand. Partners may be less interested in whether you have memorised the specific facts and more interested in how you analyse issues, justify your choices, and respond when challenged.

Wishing you the best of luck with your vacation scheme - I'm sure you'll smash it!! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon40
Are Vacation Scheme tasks super challenging? In terms of both the assessed work and more general day-to-day work. As a STEM grad who doesn't know which dept they'll be sitting in, I can't help but feel like I'm gonna show up and not know how to conduct simple legal research and basic activities 😂
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi @Abbie Whitlock ! I hope you're doing well! I have a vac scheme coming up which has a 2 hour written exercise on the first day. I am assuming it might be related to a memo we had to right as part of the recruitment process (since this was online). Do you have any idea how to prepare for this, and what other types of exercises it can potentially be? Should I look into different legal formats apart from a memo? Thank you so much :)
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hello!

I haven't done this type of presentation myself, so others who have been through a similar vacation scheme exercise may be able to give more specific advice. However, from a general presentation perspective, I'd be inclined to keep the structure fairly simple given the five-minute time limit.

For example, you could briefly introduce the practice area, identify two or three key legal or commercial challenges it is currently facing, and then spend the majority of your time analysing why those challenges matter for clients and the firm. It usually helps to focus more on depth, rather than trying to cover too many issues in such a short amount of time. You could then end with a short conclusion that pulls the points together and briefly highlight why these challenges are particularly significant or what they might mean going forward.

In terms of slides, my instinct would be that fewer is better for a five-minute presentation - perhaps around 4-6 slides, depending on how much detail you are including and how many issues you are discussing. The slides should support your points and give prompts of the most important information, rather than contain everything you plan to say.

For the Q&A, I'd make sure you understand the wider context behind each challenge that you have chosen and think about potential follow-up questions beforehand. Partners may be less interested in whether you have memorised the specific facts and more interested in how you analyse issues, justify your choices, and respond when challenged.

Wishing you the best of luck with your vacation scheme - I'm sure you'll smash it!! :)
Thank you Abbie!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Are Vacation Scheme tasks super challenging? In terms of both the assessed work and more general day-to-day work. As a STEM grad who doesn't know which dept they'll be sitting in, I can't help but feel like I'm gonna show up and not know how to conduct simple legal research and basic activities 😂
Hello!

As someone who did three vacation schemes last cycle, I personally didn’t find the content of the work particularly difficult or challenging. The tasks are usually designed for students who have little or no practical legal experience, so firms and supervisors aren’t expecting you to arrive knowing how to do everything.

I was also worried beforehand about legal research and whether I’d fumble the more basic tasks, but in reality you are normally given clear instructions, guidance from trainees or associates if you need it, and enough context so that you understand how your task fits into the wider picture. The main thing that they are looking for is how you approach problems, your attention to detail, willingness to ask sensible questions, and enthusiasm to learn more. I’ve found that the majority of the time, your supervisor will be looking for you to make a genuine attempt at the task and use lots of resources to ensure that you give it your best shot - if you make a few mistakes, this is unlikely to be fatal as long as you are receptive to feedback and improve.

Lots of vac schemers come from non-law or STEM backgrounds, so I imagine you won’t be the only person learning as you go! Best of luck with the vacation scheme :)
 
Hi @Abbie Whitlock hope you are doing well!

I have four questions I am hoping you can help with:

1. I am going to be sitting in a Commercial Dispute Resolution team. The firm I am completing my VS with works across different sectors so I am not sure exactly what developments in commercial dispute resolution I should be looking into or the typical documents and processes I should be aware of. Do you have any insights on this or any advice on how to go about researching please?

2. Do you think it would be inappropriate or rude to bring a notepad with me during coffee chats to jot down any interesting points the person makes? I don't want to forget interesting insights an associate or trainee makes. I am worried that this may not make the conversation seem genuine and more of a tick box thing.

3. Finally, how long do coffee chats generally last? I am thinking of inviting trainees/associates for a 15-20 minutes chat. Is that respectful of their time? Would you recommend suggesting a longer time frame?

4. I am hoping to meet with the corporate partner that interviewed me during my AC. If they are busy and can't meet, is it appropriate to ask them if they know anyone in their team who has availability to speak to me? Or would it be better to ask my trainee buddy if they know any trainee who has sat in a corporate seat? I am very interested in corporate M&A so I am keen to speak to someone from that department if possible.


Thank you in advance! :)
 
Last edited:
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi @Abbie Whitlock ! I hope you're doing well! I have a vac scheme coming up which has a 2 hour written exercise on the first day. I am assuming it might be related to a memo we had to right as part of the recruitment process (since this was online). Do you have any idea how to prepare for this, and what other types of exercises it can potentially be? Should I look into different legal formats apart from a memo? Thank you so much :)
Hello!

I am doing well, thank you - hope you are too! Huge congratulations on securing the vacation scheme :)

I do think it is sensible to do a bit of preparation beforehand, but I'd focus less on trying to predict the exact exercise and more on building familiarity with the kinds of tasks that can come up. Since you mentioned the memo from the recruitment process, it could definitely be worth revisiting that style of exercise. I'd also have a quick look at other common formats too (e.g. emails, reports, briefing notes, attendance notes, etc.) so that you are comfortable with how they tend to be structured and presented. I wouldn't try to memorise templates, but knowing the general layout and expectations can make you feel much more comfortable if you are given an unfamiliar format on the day.

More generally, I would focus your preparation on:
  • Reading instructions carefully and identifying exactly what the task is asking
  • Practising structuring answers clearly with headings and logical flow
  • Getting comfortable extracting key information from larger documents quickly
  • Thinking commercially and practically rather than trying to sound overly legal (i.e. having a client-centric approach to the written exercise)
  • Timing yourself when completing any practice exercises

One thing I'd keep in mind on the day is that a clear and well-structured answer that fully addresses the brief is usually stronger than something longer that misses the actual question. I have also previously written a few posts on written exercises more generally, which I will quote below in case they are useful.

Best of luck with the vacation scheme - I'm sure you'll do great! :)

Hello!

Congratulations on getting the invite! 🎉 Whilst I haven't completed the Ashurst written exercise, they will usually test your ability to communicate clearly and structure your arguments logically - similar to what you'd do as a trainee when drafting emails or internal notes.

I've outlined some previous tips that I always used when preparing for written exercises below:
  • Practice timed writing - pick a 30-45 minute slot, read a short business or news article, and summarise the key points in a structured 1-2 page memo with a clear conclusion summarising your findings.
  • Work on prioritisation - pick an article with a lot of information, and practice picking out the 3-4 most important issues rather than trying to summarise and include everything.
  • Use a clear structure - this was the main thing that I implemented that helped me score higher on written assessments! Follow a clear structure in your answer, and practice what this would be for each type of document.
  • Check clarity - after writing (potentially one of the above), ask yourself if someone with no context to the facts could follow along with the information and your reasoning.
  • Proofread under pressure - I would get used to quickly checking grammar and flow, as this is really important in a written exercise! I sometimes struggled with this, as the pressure made me skip parts of my writing, but I found that literally following along with a pen or your finger can make sure you don't miss anything.
  • Review sample case studies - I would have a look online and see if there are any free resources that you can have a go at. A true lifesaver during my last cycle was this forum post by Jacob Miller, and I would definitely give it a read!

The main thing that assisted me in written exercises is following a clear structure! I would go through and read all of the materials first, and then go back to pick out the key details. You should be looking for key issues, areas that you will require more information, and anything that you think is important for the client to know.

I would then follow a clear structure in your answer. There are a a few different types of documents that they could test you on - e.g. an email, memo, report, note, etc. I would have a look beforehand at the formatting of each, and have a go at writing them! If you are writing a letter / email to a client, make sure that you aren't including technical terms and writing in way that is easy for them to understand.

I would also try and find ways to showcase that you have the skills that they are looking for in trainees. For example, in one of my previous ACs I was asked to write an email to a supervisor. In this email, I outlined my arguments and recommendation, but I ended it by offering to draft the email / document for the client (e.g. proactivity). This will be dependant on each exercise, but if you can incorporate this in some way, I think it's a great way of standing out!

I hope that assists - best of luck with the written exercise, I'm sure you'll smash it! :)

Of course, no problem at all!!

Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:

Understand the Purpose and Audience

Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.

For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.

Use a Clear and Logical Structure

The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:

  1. Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
  2. Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
  3. Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.

Keep your tone professional and approachable

I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.

Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!

Be precise and client-focused

Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".

Check for clarity and tone at the end

Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.

As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.

I hope that helps!

Hello!

A few resources below that I used / might be useful:
  • Definitive Guide to Law Firm Case Studies (whilst this is a case study, instead of a written exercise, I found it super useful last cycle!)
  • TCLA Written Exercises (a good way to practice if you are able to pay to access resources)
  • Some law firms upload example written exercises online - I believe DWF has one available!

Hopefully they help as a starting point - best of luck! :)
 
Hi @Abbie Whitlock hope you are doing well!

I have four questions I am hoping you can help with:

1. I am going to be sitting in a Commercial Dispute Resolution team. The firm I am completing my VS with works across different sectors so I am not sure exactly what developments in commercial dispute resolution I should be looking into or the typical documents and processes I should be aware of. Do you have any insights on this or any advice on how to go about researching please?

2. Do you think it would be inappropriate or rude to bring a notepad with me during coffee chats to jot down any interesting points the person makes? I don't want to forget interesting insights an associate or trainee makes. I am worried that this may not make the conversation seem genuine and more of a tick box thing.

3. Finally, how long do coffee chats generally last? I am thinking of inviting trainees/associates for a 15-20 minutes chat. Is that respectful of their time? Would you recommend suggesting a longer time frame?

4. I am hoping to meet with the corporate partner that interviewed me during my AC. If they are busy and can't meet, is it appropriate to ask them if they know anyone in their team who has availability to speak to me? Or would it be better to ask my trainee buddy if they know any trainee who has sat in a corporate seat? I am very interested in corporate M&A so I am keen to speak to someone from that department if possible.


Thank you in advance! :)
Hi!

I am doing well, thank you - hope you are too!

For your first question, I would try not to worry too much about preparing technical legal knowledge as the work can vary a lot depending on the type of dispute, clients and sectors the firm works in. Since the firm operates across different sectors, I'd probably start by looking at the team page and reading a few recent matters or news updates that they have published. Rather than trying to understand every legal detail, I'd focus more on the commercial side - i.e. what triggered the dispute, what was at stake for the client, and why the outcome mattered to them. If you want to do some broader preparation, it could be useful to familiarise yourself with the general lifecycle of disputes (e.g. investigation, disclosure, witness evidence, settlement, trial/arbitration) and the different firms of ADR (e.g. mediation, negotiation, arbitration, etc.), but I really wouldn't feel pressure to know specific documents in advance. Curiosity and asking thoughtful questions will probably take you further than trying to learn procedure, and you'll learn lots when you are actually on the scheme itself.

For your second question, I don't think it is rude at all (+ I did this for all of my coffee chats), and think it can show genuine interest if you do it naturally! You might not want to take lots of notes during the conversation itself (although you can probably jot down anything important or key), but I did used to make some brief notes immediately afterwards and I found that really helpful. You end up having so many conversations over a scheme that it becomes surprisingly difficult to remember interesting insights or specific facts people have mentioned, and I never felt like making notes made the conversations less genuine.

For your third question, I think suggesting 15-20 minutes is completely respectful and probably what I would recommend too. I found it encourages people to say yes as it feels manageable in their day, and if they have more time the conversation will often naturally continue (which is why I typically put it in their calendar as a 25/30 minute, just in case).

For your last question, I think it is absolutely fine to reach out if you had a good interaction at the AC and explain that you really enjoyed speaking with them and would love to learn more about Corporate/M&A if they have availability. If they are busy, I probably wouldn't ask them to redirect you to someone else - instead, I would separately ask your trainee buddy whether they know any trainees or associates currently sitting in Corporate who may be open to a quick chat. In my experience, trainee buddies are often great at making those introductions and are usually more than happy to.

It sounds like you are being proactive and thoughtful in preparing for the scheme, which is a great sign! I'd try to remember that you don't need to maximise every single interaction, and some of the most useful conversations end up being the spontaneous ones too!

Best of luck, and I'm sure you'll smash it! :)
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.