WDYM last cycle if you dont mind me asking? was this your 5th cycle?macfarlanes pfo with which my last ever cycle ends. i have one more to hear back but it’s a pfo i am certain
Wha career paths you looking at?4th cycle but i had personally decided to be done after this since i haven’t managed to be successful and look for alternative career paths to progress!
Is it because you have not made it past the application stage?4th cycle but i had personally decided to be done after this since i haven’t managed to be successful and look for alternative career paths to progress!
I thought the written exercise was more of a mark up ? Can anyone confirm/correct me ?When is your assessment day by the way? Mine was on the 2nd June, there was a contract written exercise. Practice those such as contract law
Hey everyone. Anything from Dorsey?
Hey!Hi!
For the question: “Why have you chosen to apply to HFW and how do you think the firm differs from its competitors?”
Would I be missing out something in my answer if I don’t mention how HFW is predominantly a disputes firm, and trainees are likely to do 3 contentious and 1 transactions seat?
It contradicts with what I said about liking to see the lifecycle of a contract, from due diligence to int arb (should things go wrong).
View attachment 8346
Thank you very much in advance for any tips!
Hey!Can anyone please provide insight on how to answer a scenario-based question, like how you would handle a challenging situation in a VI? Thanks.
Thank you so much, Abbie! Can I say that “Since HFW is primarily a disputes firm. As a student who has completed the Bar Training Course, HFW blend of transactions plus a focus on disputes appeals to me.”Hey!
I don't think you'd be missing anything by not mentioning that specifically. The question is about why HFW appeals to you and how it differs from its competitors, rather than covering every USP.
I also don't think your answer contradicts itself, as you are saying that you enjoy seeing the full lifecycle of a matter (e.g. from advising at the outset through to resolving disputes if things go wrong). HFW's disputes focus actually complements that, so it might just be about slightly adjusting the wording rather than changing the point entirely.
If you do mention the seat structure, I would only do so if you can explain why it appeals to you personally. Otherwise, I would prioritise keeping your answer coherent and authentic rather than trying to fit in a firm-specific point for the sake of it![]()