I thought the written exercise was more of a mark up ? Can anyone confirm/correct me ?
Last edited:
-
Hey Guest, applications for BCLP’s Open Day close at 12pm on 25 September. Apply via this link. We wish you the best of luck!
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
Hi all, I am an international law graduate from India. I am looking to apply for training contracts 2028-2029 acceptance cycle. Are there any list of firms and deadline circulated in this group? How difficult is getting TC as someone having zero work exp in UK? Any tips if its the right path forward to enter UK market?
Can anyone please provide insight on how to answer a scenario-based question, like how you would handle a challenging situation in a VI? Thanks.
Hey!
I don't think you'd be missing anything by not mentioning that specifically. The question is about why HFW appeals to you and how it differs from its competitors, rather than covering every USP.
I also don't think your answer contradicts itself, as you are saying that you enjoy seeing the full lifecycle of a matter (e.g. from advising at the outset through to resolving disputes if things go wrong). HFW's disputes focus actually complements that, so it might just be about slightly adjusting the wording rather than changing the point entirely.
If you do mention the seat structure, I would only do so if you can explain why it appeals to you personally. Otherwise, I would prioritise keeping your answer coherent and authentic rather than trying to fit in a firm-specific point for the sake of it
Hey!
For scenario-based questions, I would try to focus on showing your thought process and judgement, rather than trying to find the "right" answer.
A structure that I always found helpful was:
1. Briefly explain what you think the key issue/conflict is
2. State what you would do (i.e. the specific steps you would take, and any further information you would need)
3. Explain why you would take that approach, linking it to skills like teamwork, communication, or commercial awareness
4. If relevant, mention that you would seek guidance from a supervisor/colleague if the situation required it.
I would also remember that there often isn't one perfect answer. The interviewers are usually look at how you analyse the situation, balance competing priorities, and justify your decision, so I'd make sure that you clearly explain your reasoning rather than just describing what you would do.
I hope that assists!
I have my first AC coming up and I'm not totally sure how much commercial awareness I need? I'd say I have a basic layer but how deep are the partners going to dive/how much am I expected to know?
Thank you so much, Abbie! Can I say that “Since HFW is primarily a disputes firm. As a student who has completed the Bar Training Course, HFW blend of transactions plus a focus on disputes appeals to me.”Hey!
I don't think you'd be missing anything by not mentioning that specifically. The question is about why HFW appeals to you and how it differs from its competitors, rather than covering every USP.
I also don't think your answer contradicts itself, as you are saying that you enjoy seeing the full lifecycle of a matter (e.g. from advising at the outset through to resolving disputes if things go wrong). HFW's disputes focus actually complements that, so it might just be about slightly adjusting the wording rather than changing the point entirely.
If you do mention the seat structure, I would only do so if you can explain why it appeals to you personally. Otherwise, I would prioritise keeping your answer coherent and authentic rather than trying to fit in a firm-specific point for the sake of it
Would it throw a recruiter off? Would they think “oh how about you do a pupillage then why HFW”
For the q: “Why have you chosen to apply to HFW and how do you think the firm differs from its competitors?”
This was a part of my answer:
With global issues like trade protectionism and climate change, the value of lawyers specializing in supply chain disputes is increasing exponentially. HFW’s international arbitration specialism that ranges from highly affected sectors like energy, construction, commodities, shipping, aviation, and insurance&reinsurance makes it the perfect place for me to train right now.
Can I please have some general opinions - as a bystander who’s just read this - does this part sound cheesy?
This was a part of my answer:
With global issues like trade protectionism and climate change, the value of lawyers specializing in supply chain disputes is increasing exponentially. HFW’s international arbitration specialism that ranges from highly affected sectors like energy, construction, commodities, shipping, aviation, and insurance&reinsurance makes it the perfect place for me to train right now.
Can I please have some general opinions - as a bystander who’s just read this - does this part sound cheesy?
Last edited:
Thank you, Abbie.Hey!
For scenario-based questions, I would try to focus on showing your thought process and judgement, rather than trying to find the "right" answer.
A structure that I always found helpful was:
1. Briefly explain what you think the key issue/conflict is
2. State what you would do (i.e. the specific steps you would take, and any further information you would need)
3. Explain why you would take that approach, linking it to skills like teamwork, communication, or commercial awareness
4. If relevant, mention that you would seek guidance from a supervisor/colleague if the situation required it.
I would also remember that there often isn't one perfect answer. The interviewers are usually look at how you analyse the situation, balance competing priorities, and justify your decision, so I'd make sure that you clearly explain your reasoning rather than just describing what you would do.
I hope that assists!
Hi!
Congratulations on your first AC!
I think it depends a little on the firm and the type of interview, but in general, I don't think they're expecting you to have the same level of commercial awareness as a trainee/qualified lawyer.
I would make sure that you have a solid understanding of a few recent commercial stories that are relevant to the firm's clients or sectors, and that you can explain what happened, why it matters, and what the implications might be for businesses, their legal advisers, and the firm itself. In my experience, that is much more important than trying to memorise lots of facts.
A good way to approach it is to think about how a commercial trend creates legal work. For example, if you are interviewing at a firm with a strong shipping practice and discussing geopolitical tensions, you might explain how this could lead to clients needing the commercial team to review and renegotiate contracts, the insurance team to advise on coverage or claims, the disputes team incase any contractual issues arise, and the sanctions or regulatory teams to advise them on compliance. Making those links between the commercial issue and the legal work can show the interviewers that you understand both the current commercial events, but also the wider impact and why clients/firms care.
If they do ask follow-up questions, they are often testing how you think rather than whether you know every detail. It is absolutely fine to acknowledge if you do not know something, provided you can reason through the commercial implications based on what you know. It is usually best to share your views on something and explain your thought process or reasoning behind it, rather than not saying anything at all due to a fear of getting it wrong.
More generally, I would also make sure you are comfortable answering broader questions like "why commercial law?", "why this firm", and discussing the firm's key practice areas, sectors and recent work, as those often tie into commercial awareness and research too.
Overall, I think it is often better to focus on developing a good depth of understanding of a handful of stories, rather than trying to know a little bit about everything.
Wishing you the best of luck with your AC - you've got this!!
Hey!
No worries at all! I don't think that would throw the recruiter off - if anything, it can help explain why you are particularly interested in HFW's disputes practice.
I would just make sure you link it back to why you want to be a solicitor. For example, if I was writing an answer, I would say something like: "Having completed the Bar Training Course, I developed a strong interest in contentious work. HFW's combination of market-leading disputes work alongside exposure to transactional matters particularly appeals to me, as it offers the opportunity to see matters from both a preventative and contentious perspective".
I'd just make sure you use your background as a way of explaining your interest in HFW and the solicitor route, rather than suggesting you are looking for an alternative to pupillage
Hey!
Personally, I don't think it sounds cheesy overall. I think the underlying point is strong as you are linking global commercial trends to HFW's sector strengths, which is exactly the sort of connection that firms want to see in a motivational question.
I would perhaps tweak the phrase "the perfect place for me to train right now", as it reads a little absolute. You could soften it slightly with something like "makes HFW a particularly attractive place for me to train" or "is one of the key reasons HFW appeals to me". I think those sound a bit more natural while making the same point.
Overall though, I think you are definitely on the right track! Best of luck with your HFW application
Thank you very much, Abbie!!Hey!
Personally, I don't think it sounds cheesy overall. I think the underlying point is strong as you are linking global commercial trends to HFW's sector strengths, which is exactly the sort of connection that firms want to see in a motivational question.
I would perhaps tweak the phrase "the perfect place for me to train right now", as it reads a little absolute. You could soften it slightly with something like "makes HFW a particularly attractive place for me to train" or "is one of the key reasons HFW appeals to me". I think those sound a bit more natural while making the same point.
Overall though, I think you are definitely on the right track! Best of luck with your HFW application
Interesting, thank you. I believe it’s now been two months since my interview so getting a little worried haha
It was in fact a PFO. Gutted.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
NEW: Autumn, Winter, Spring and Summer Vacation Scheme Deadlines 2026-27- Latest: Lawstoodent
-
Top Members
Posts
-
This leaderboard is empty.
-
Jaysen
- +141
- 280
Antoni Trochimowicz
-
New
- 119
user55998384
- +140
- 54
alanshore
- +348
- 39
anon78365222111
- +148
- 37
-
Abbie Whitlock
- +430
- 1081
Harvey Specter - Presiding Partner
- +426
- 652
Jaysen
- +463
- 516
Novaa
- +714
- 460
Jessica Pearson - Managing Partner
- +975
- 371