To play Devil’s advocate, you also have more time to screw up though on longer schemes.
I don’t think the length of scheme is really an issue though. The firm recognises what can be achieved in that period of time.
The things to check with winter schemes are:
- whether you are eligible - they...
It isn't necessarily enrolment that will be the issue, it will be whether you get your results in enough time to start the TC in September 2022 - timings can often be very tight, especially if you are not on a sponsored course.
Only if it is a fast-track course, but even then it will depend on your start date for the TC in September, as you will need your results before you can start (for vast majority of firms).
Enrolment will be pretty quick as soon as you have signed contracts and made any necessary payments.
To me these aren’t really connected. A firm could have an established large intake and still invests heavily into their trainees. Also many firm will recruit trainees but not necessarily invest in them. To me investing is about spending money, time or resource into training.
Have you spoken to Birmingham to see if you can go back into your second year? I think this is a first steo
This is only how I can interpret what you have written, but if you feel like you arse going backwards at Manchester and you choose to stay, maybe it’s worthwhile pouring yourself into...
Apply4law and Allhires are technically the same company so I suspect they are connected somehow. If you are applying to paralegal roles or other roles outside of TCs or VSs that might be why it is Allhires rather than apply4law.
STAR typically only works for competency questions. Generally for work experience, you can focus on your responsibilities and impact/success (AR). The ST part is typically is self explanatory from the heading of the work experience.
You should speak to the provider/institution about this and whether the GDL is effectively a prep course, or whether they are just delivering it to teach a legal postgraduate qualification. Some law firms are suggesting they will put their non law grads through the GDL and an SQE prep course...
It’s not a question I have asked before. I often ask someone to explain something complex in the most simplistic/concise way in an interview, but this typically isn’t a commercial context.
Is this an application or interview question?
Then there would be a big question as to why you are interested in the work the firm does.
There are nuances to the benefits of working on big deals though that may be linked to what you are saying - a lot of people cite the prestige and pride on working on such matters and explain why they...
Whatever your answer it just need to be genuine - there is little point saying stuff for the sake of it, as you are unlikely to get very far when probed on your answers.
You have to remember as a lawyer you often cannot talk about the deals you are working on though - there will be times where...
The only things you could do is look to gain qualifying work experience and take the SQE or find a firm that is recruiting for 2022 or 2023 intakes. I wouldn’t see two years out as a waste of time though - if anything see it as an opportunity to do something different/what you want to do...
I’d apply to whatever programme you think is best for you with your timings/commitments/other TC application strategy. They may have started to give out invites, but they probably still have an awful lot more to give out.
They could just take the SQE assessments (exams). They don’t need to take any courses nor complete a two year period of qualifying work experience. The big question would be why a Indian qualified lawyer with three years experience needed to go through a SQE training contract process.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.