General Discussion Thread 2020-21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi! I attended a Freshfields Virtual Event today. It was a substitute for the Afternoon Tea session they were going to have last academic year. I did submit an application and the event was originally by invite. However, it turned into a virtual event and so I assumed it was open to everybody. Only 16 people turned up in the call so I was wondering if it did end up being selective and if I could include this under work experience or would it be considered a general, open to all firm presentation?
Not all virtual events are open to everyone and you have to apply for most open days and get accepted despite them being virtual!
 
I'm doing the LLM Law and Legal Practice at BPP but it is literally the PGDL with a project at the end to make it a masters - and everyone doing it including myself pretty much only did so because we needed postgrad funding.

When I apply to firms, should I write that my course is LLM Law and Legal Practice or should i just write PGDL - as i am doing all the same PGDL modules and exams etc

I am worried if i write LLM Law and Legal Practice that, as it is a new course, firms may not realise this is just a replica of the PGDL as the name is so similar to masters versions of the LPC run by BPP and ULaw / will it be obvious that this is an SRA approved law conversion. Do i need to explain it further?
 
Hi! I attended a Freshfields Virtual Event today. It was a substitute for the Afternoon Tea session they were going to have last academic year. I did submit an application and the event was originally by invite. However, it turned into a virtual event and so I assumed it was open to everybody. Only 16 people turned up in the call so I was wondering if it did end up being selective and if I could include this under work experience or would it be considered a general, open to all firm presentation?

to me it isn’t work experience, but definitely something to include on your application elsewhere
 
I'm doing the LLM Law and Legal Practice at BPP but it is literally the PGDL with a project at the end to make it a masters - and everyone doing it including myself pretty much only did so because we needed postgrad funding.

When I apply to firms, should I write that my course is LLM Law and Legal Practice or should i just write PGDL - as i am doing all the same PGDL modules and exams etc

I am worried if i write LLM Law and Legal Practice that, as it is a new course, firms may not realise this is just a replica of the PGDL as the name is so similar to masters versions of the LPC run by BPP and ULaw / will it be obvious that this is an SRA approved law conversion. Do i need to explain it further?

firms will know what it is - don’t worry about that
 
@Jessica Booker I applied for a VS with HSF and completed the online test portion a few days ago, after which I got a report regarding my competencies which really didn't seem promising (out of the 4 they said they look for, I had 1 excellent, 1 good, and 2 average / poor). However I received an email today saying I meet the benchmark and my application is now under review.

Do you think they will now review the application together with my score on the online test, or was the online test just a cut-off step that is no longer relevant to further application stages?
 
Anyone having trouble loading Hogan Lovell's apply page? I've been having problems recently.

Edit: This is the error message I got. "We are sorry but there has been a problem processing your request. Please try again."
 
@Jessica Booker I applied for a VS with HSF and completed the online test portion a few days ago, after which I got a report regarding my competencies which really didn't seem promising (out of the 4 they said they look for, I had 1 excellent, 1 good, and 2 average / poor). However I received an email today saying I meet the benchmark and my application is now under review.

Do you think they will now review the application together with my score on the online test, or was the online test just a cut-off step that is no longer relevant to further application stages?

Difficult to say - could easily be either, it really depends on the firm.
 
This seems to be the new "mistake" to make....

Before logging into a Zoom meeting, whether for an open day, seminar or interview - check your log in name.

Had my first very questionable name come up on Zoom this week - came up with something like "XXKovidcutieXX" is in the waiting room at the start of an interview.

But I am also seeing lots of people log in, probably on computers/devices that are shared, and so they are logging in on their families/housemates Zoom account. Probably best to log into Zoom ahead of the meeting and ensure the screen name is something appropriate!
 
@Jessica Booker

Is not fully completing a written case study the make it or break it for getting a VS offer? The written case study was the last round of assessments

not at all - exercises like this are typically designed to not be finished by a fair proportion of candidates. It doesn’t mean they are unsuccessful - it is just putting time pressure on it makes the exercise more challenging and realistic of the type of scenarios you may face as a trainee. I wouldn’t have recruited probably more than a third of the trainees I did if it was a make or break matter.
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: CMD
not at all - exercises like this are typically designed to not be finished by a fair proportion of candidates. It doesn’t mean they are unsuccessful - it is just putting time pressure on it makes the exercise more challenging and realistic of the type of scenarios you may face as a trainee. I wouldn’t have recruited probably more than a third of the trainees I did if it was a make or break matter.

thank you, thats quite reassuring!
 
This seems to be the new "mistake" to make....

Before logging into a Zoom meeting, whether for an open day, seminar or interview - check your log in name.

Had my first very questionable name come up on Zoom this week - came up with something like "XXKovidcutieXX" is in the waiting room at the start of an interview.

But I am also seeing lots of people log in, probably on computers/devices that are shared, and so they are logging in on their families/housemates Zoom account. Probably best to log into Zoom ahead of the meeting and ensure the screen name is something appropriate!

This made me laugh - we noticed this a lot when we used to do our virtual training sessions. It then makes it confusing to address that candidate in a group setting, especially if you haven't met them before!
 
Hi everybody!

As a CMS BA this year I want to let everybody know about the current opportunity on offer!
Not only will signing up to CMS' mailing list give you the chance to receive exclusive hints and tips from the Early Talent Team and be the first to know about new events and opportunities, but also there is currently the chance to win a £150 gift voucher of your choice which is great on the run up to Christmas! All you need to do is register using the link below and be quick as there is only 2 days left to sign up to be in with the chance to win!

The emails are filled with great content and are reasonably managed, however you can unsubscribe at any time if you wish to do so (although I doubt you would want to;))!

If you click this link it should take you to the registration form which takes less than two minutes to complete- http://ocply.co/cms2020-glas
 
Hello everyone,

I just wanted to ask if anyone knows any firms strong in PE? I have applied to the obvious ones:

- Kirkland & Ellis
- Weil
- Latham & Watkins
- Ropes & Gray
- Sidley Austin (not sure if they’re strong on PE yet or if the PE practice is growing)
- Travers Smith (I think)

I want to apply to more vac schemes than the above but cannot find anymore firms that are strong on PE.

The whole Magic Circle minus Slaughters are ranked in the top two Bands on Chambers UK for PE Buyouts; alongside those White & Case, Macfarlanes
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Rene
  • 🤝
Reactions: Rene
Status
Not open for further replies.