TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

[WillKitchen]

I've just finished drafting my Paul Hastings application and will submit in a day or two. Anyone in a similar position fancy swapping drafts for peer review?

 

[nicoledm]

That's amazing congrats!!! Good luck for that interview !!!

Thank you!!

 

[Irishman11]

Has anyone heard anything positive from either:
1. Mayer Brown (post VI+SJT)
2. Macfarlanes (post Simulate test - the second SJT with VI mixed in)
3. Bakers (post VI, since last weeks AC?)
4. Reed Smith (post written app - based on recent comments it seems not)

Mostly interested if any AC invites have gone out for MB, Macs or RS, or if anyone knows if Bakers is a guaranteed PFO atp?

Nothing back from MacFarlanes to anyone I think. I think they do it in July usually.

 

[Vee77]

submitted my Reed Smith application questions just on time lol

fingers crossed for us

 

[174Tess9y3]

Hi @Abbie Whitlock !

I hope you’re well.

I was wondering if you had any tips regarding an open day application - is there any structure I should follow when answering why I’m interested in attending?

 

[Abbie Whitlock]

Hi @Abbie Whitlock !

I hope you’re well.

I was wondering if you had any tips regarding an open day application - is there any structure I should follow when answering why I’m interested in attending?

Hi!

I am doing well, thank you - hope you are too!

For an open day application, I would generally try to structure the answer around three points:

1. Why you are interested in commercial law: for example, what specifically has sparked that interest, and how have you developed this?
2. Why you are interested in this particular firm: be as specific as possible here and refer to the firm's practice areas, sector strengths, culture, recent work, or anything else that stands out to you. It also helps to link it back to your own experiences and passions if you can, as that can emphasise why you are interested in it.
3. Why the open day would be valuable to you: for example, gaining a better understanding of the firm's work, speaking with trainees and lawyers, and confirming that the firm's culture and practice align with your interests.

The third point is often the most important and, in my view, is what distinguishes an open day application from a vacation scheme or training contract application. Rather than focusing on providing that you are already committed to the firm (though you should still show genuine interest), explain what you hope to learn from the experience and why attending the open day would help you make a more informed decision about your future applications.

I would focus less on proving you are the perfect candidate and more on demonstrating genuine curiosity about the firm and making the most of the opportunity. The strongest answers tend to be the ones that can clearly explain why they want to attend this specific open day, rather than any open day at all.

Best of luck with your application!

 

[spamelinazoid]

Any WFW comms?

 

[juanitasimi]

Any WFW comms?

Stressing me out seeing this posted lol

 

[bristol rovers]

Browne Jacobson telephone invite came Friday. No apology for getting back 3 weeks later than they said they would lmao

 

[WheresYourUCL]

Any WFW comms?

Have you thought about emailing them when you are likely to hear back as there is nothing wrong in emailing them asking a timeline.

 

[spamelinazoid]

Have you thought about emailing them when you are likely to hear back as there is nothing wrong in emailing them asking a timeline.

I feel like emailing comes after you dont hear anything for ages. Im just asking around if there’s been any movement re AC invites after the batch of VIs due last week.

 

[WheresYourUCL]

I feel like emailing comes after you dont hear anything for ages. Im just asking around if there’s been any movement re AC invites after the batch of VIs due last week.

I get you and think it might be early days so they are looking at VI's this week and will likely get back to people in the next 2-3 weeks. I saw 1 person got rejected from VI last week so it might be good news for you. Also think they might wait until the Vacation Scheme is finished then send AC invites. I hope you get the AC.

 

[futuresolicitor2028]

Has anyone navigated reasonable adjustments in during the vacation scheme please? Positive/ helpful experiences appreciated. Not sure how to navigate

 

[lovelaw223]

Anyone heard from Broadfield direct TC following VI? They said mid June!?

 

[Round1]

Has anyone navigated reasonable adjustments in during the vacation scheme please? Positive/ helpful experiences appreciated. Not sure how to navigate

This is my personal experience only and I might be reading more into it than I should however on the basis that it might be helpful I'm posting it. My success rate has gone up very significantly since I stopped disclosing my ADHD and staying that I get academic extra time.. I tend to use the same base answers to many questions for different firms (obviously I tailor them) but IMO in such a highly pressurised, time critical environment, what HR teams say in terms of their approach to adjustments might not match up with what is actually required on the ground. Just putting it out there..

 

[Bread]

This is my personal experience only and I might be reading more into it than I should however on the basis that it might be helpful I'm posting it. My success rate has gone up very significantly since I stopped disclosing my ADHD and staying that I get academic extra time.. I tend to use the same base answers to many questions for different firms (obviously I tailor them) but IMO in such a highly pressurised, time critical environment, what HR teams say in terms of their approach to adjustments might not match up with what is actually required on the ground. Just putting it out there..

I’ve always thought this too. It’s a job that is known for requiring extended periods of focus, time management, and attention to detail, and you aren’t going to get extra time close a deal just because you have ADHD.
I think the claims about inclusion are more to be understood as “we won’t discriminate you on the basis that you have a disability, as long as you don’t let it affect your and the team’s performance”

 

[summersun]

I’ve always thought this too. It’s a job that is known for requiring extended periods of focus, time management, and attention to detail, and you aren’t going to get extra time close a deal just because you have ADHD.
I think the claims about inclusion are more to be understood as “we won’t discriminate you on the basis that you have a disability, as long as you don’t let it affect your and the team’s performance”

I have personally always asked for 25% additional time for written exercise ( for adhd and another condition) but never disclosed the reasons unless asked which has never happened so far. While I don't have a TC yet I did get VS/ACs for DTC without this being an issue.

 

[QuillandCounsel]

Any updates on RS?