For Clifford Chance, the applicaation question do er use STAR when answering the application question.
Yes grad rec specifically said they're looking for STAR.For Clifford Chance, the applicaation question do er use STAR when answering the application question.
Hiya, I have completed three virtual internships - would you include them as three lots of work experience, combine them into one, or not as work experience at all? Would really appreciate some help if poss!
I'm in the same situation. If i was applying for a first-year scheme at Clifford Chance, should i only include the virtual internship I did with them, or the other two? I felt like only the CC one helps me substantiate my answer for the "why this firm" question. But I have no experience so id like the opinion of someone more experienced than myselfCombine them all into one!
would that be a symposium / training webinar?How would you describe webinars hosted by law firms for clients? I know there is a specific name for these types of webinars but I can't think of it
Depends on how you are writing it. SME’s can also be subject matter experts which is also regularly used, so it needs to be clear that you mean this version of the acronym.Hi all, I was wondering if it is alright to use the acronym 'SMEs' instead of 'small and medium-sized enterprises' to save words on my application form? @Jessica Booker what are your thoughts?
thanks Jessica!Depends on how you are writing it. SME’s can also be subject matter experts which is also regularly used, so it needs to be clear that you mean this version of the acronym.
I'm in the same situation. If i was applying for a first-year scheme at Clifford Chance, should i only include the virtual internship I did with them, or the other two? I felt like only the CC one helps me substantiate my answer for the "why this firm" question. But I have no experience so id like the opinion of someone more experienced than myself
Perfectly fine. A proudest achievement doesn’t have a time limit on it - you just pick the best exampleGeneral question re: 'proudest achievement' type questions - my go-to example is a bit dated now and revolves around an initiative I spearheaded at the end of my undergraduate in 2018. Since graduating I've moved to London from overseas, done the GDL, done an LLM and spent time working, but haven't done much I really consider remarkable outside of academic achievement. Is something I did 3+ years ago now too stale?
Very relieved to hear that, thanks Jessica.Perfectly fine. A proudest achievement doesn’t have a time limit on it - you just pick the best example
What firm(s) asks this app question?If you were to introduce a new law what would it be. For this application question, I was thinking of discussing the Combined Code should become law instead of the comply or explain the principle. What do you lot think about this.
Why should the combined code be legislated? Counterarguments would be that the City is more competitive if it's flexible; industry self-regulation will tend to be more flexible than legislative edict; there would be a substantial administrative burden (including associated costs) if there was a move to state oversight; the expertise currently available at the FRC could be difficult to reproduce in a state body; existing funding structures could be harder to justify in the context of state regulation. A useful point of comparison which has enjoyed a lot of attention would probably be the status of the Takeover Panel/Code and how that slots into the company law apparatus.If you were to introduce a new law what would it be. For this application question, I was thinking of discussing the Combined Code should become law instead of the comply or explain the principle. What do you lot think about this.
CovingtonWhat firm(s) asks this app question?
I agree with everything you said and agree with the flexibility but this came to mind when thinking about a new law and could lead to negative impacts on investors.Why should the combined code be legislated? Counterarguments would be that the City is more competitive if it's flexible; industry self-regulation will tend to be more flexible than legislative edict; there would be a substantial administrative burden (including associated costs) if there was a move to state oversight; the expertise currently available at the FRC could be difficult to reproduce in a state body; existing funding structures could be harder to justify in the context of state regulation. A useful point of comparison which has enjoyed a lot of attention would probably be the status of the Takeover Panel/Code and how that slots into the company law apparatus.
Yes I know what you mean and thank you very much for this.I think you need to start with a compelling case that the current regime is inadequate, formulate an alternative and dispatch substantive objections.