Thank you sweet ppl of TCLA for helping me get through this hell weekend of waiting to firms to reply. I had a blast drinking two kettles full of tea.
Last edited:
Thank you so so much, that's super helpful. I think I am nervous about non-firm related commercial awareness questions coming up. I am comfortable speaking about the firm's work and I am aware of a few commercial trends that may affect the firm specifically or their clients, but I am not prepared for commercial awareness questions outside of that. Should I be fine or would you recommend more preparation?I don't think they were too difficult. Personal strengths, character and one company type question. The time limit got me on the first question though so be mindful it's only 60 seconds.
Why is it a shock to the system that Slaughter's vacation scheme consisted predominantly of white students, especially considering that white people account for roughly 80% of the UK population? I think we can have a legitimate conversation regarding representation, but I'm keen to understand what a perfectly representative vacation scheme, in your opinion, would have looked like. I think this conversation will only be meaningful if we define the metric by which we judge representation. If the metric is the general UK population, then having a VS consisting of over 50% white students is a perfectly representative one. If the metric is London, which has a 36% white population, then we can begin to say that white students on the VS are over-represented. In any case, there is still the question of why a VS demographic should be artificially made to represent a wider population.I agree, Slaughters is a firm known for this. I completed a VS with them, and most of the people on the scheme were white. Also, in terms of their associates and partners they are all white coloured to say the least lol!
If you get a similar question to mine you should be perfectly fineThank you so so much, that's super helpful. I think I am nervous about non-firm related commercial awareness questions coming up. I am comfortable speaking about the firm's work and I am aware of a few commercial trends that may affect the firm specifically or their clients, but I am not prepared for commercial awareness questions outside of that. Should I be fine or would you recommend more preparation?
Which US law firm was this ?It’s really sad when some people believe that ethnic minorities/disadvantaged backgrounds are prioritised by law firm when dishing out TCs.
I recently was at a US law firm for the AC and more than half of candidates there were from Oxbridge. In my group I was the only one not from Oxbridge. I asked them about their professional background and I was told by all of them that they only have extra curricular experience (except one who had a month of work experience somewhere). I was really shocked because on my CV I have a lot of diverse work experiences while some people there showed up only with Oxbridge on CV.
It’s really disappointing when firms first ask for “different skills” etc. And then they invite people to the AC with only “society experience” just cause they went to Oxbridge.
How is a 19 years old with nothing on his CV, other than Oxbridge, a better candidate than a ethnic minority/socially disadvantaged candidate with a lot of skills and work experiences?
Elitism runs deep in the London legal sphere.
- Interest ratesAny thoughts as to the main commercial trends affecting law firms today? Main points I can think of are AI, but would definitely appreciate more insight!
Here are some articles that might be worth a read to consider the answer to this question. I would make sure your answer is more tailored to the type of firm you are applying to though:Any thoughts as to the main commercial trends affecting law firms today? Main points I can think of are AI, but would definitely appreciate more insight!
www.lawyer-monthly.com
Welcome to the TCLA forum! As this is your first post you may not be aware that the moderators have asked to move diversity discussion to a new thread. Feel free to start one and once again a warm welcome!Why is it a shock to the system that Slaughter's vacation scheme consisted predominantly of white students, especially considering that white people account for roughly 80% of the UK population? I think we can have a legitimate conversation regarding representation, but I'm keen to understand what a perfectly representative vacation scheme, in your opinion, would have looked like. I think this conversation will only be meaningful if we define the metric by which we judge representation. If the metric is the general UK population, then having a VS consisting of over 50% white students is a perfectly representative one. If the metric is London, which has a 36% white population, then we can begin to say that white students on the VS are over-represented. In any case, there is still the question of why a VS demographic should be artificially made to represent a wider population.
Edit: In response to the moderator comment, they're right - my 36% stat only accounts for the White Brit population, the general White population in London could be anything near 50%, but my overarching point still stands.
Moderator - statistics relating to the White population of London are incorrect and only factor in the 'White British' population of London.
Nah not after that Nigeria performanceShould have grabbed popcorn from Sainsbury's earlier. When the tea on here is good it's sooooo good 🤭💅
It's my honest opinion that whoever bothers to pay attention to football deserves jail time.Nah not after that Nigeria performance
clifford chance seems to be one imo, i’ve never managed to apply because their deadlines are quite early but just based off the people i know there and speaking to the former grad rec toby horner(?), they seem genuinely interested in diversity. i don’t have more experience than this so i could be wrong but based off the people i know who are there and meeting them at law fairs etc. they seem sincereLike what you’ve said. Super interesting. Are there any firms you think have “worked well” with diversity? From your experiences and friends of course.
From what I’ve gathered the firms with bigger cohorts and “reputation” tend to do better. In terms of having a good amount and a strong approach for wellbeing.
I'll add onto that- Interest rates
- ESG
- Private equity changes (fundraising and structuring)
- UK election + international conflicts
These are the only ones I could think off the top of my head!
I managed to all of them but couldnt save so when the task restarted - i half-arsed themthe artic shores literally gave me a headache 🤣 the last security game my god I was gonna throw my laptop whenever I had to restart
AI: lots of firms are collaborating with tech companies to create their own AI tools to help clients & the new EU AI law that’s coming out. Data privacy/cybersecurity in the context of AI is also worth reading into.Any thoughts as to the main commercial trends affecting law firms today? Main points I can think of are AI, but would definitely appreciate more insight!
Did you get any useful responses to this please?Does anyone know what the format is for DWF's VI? Also do they ask any commercial awareness questions?
yeah I was pretty confused from the report as well but its not a pfo until the rejection email comes thruHas anyone else completed nrf’s games and found the report so weird? I got a lot to the right and a lot to the left and the rest in the middle, I read through the qualities and I think they are completely not who I am in real life! Shall I assume pfo rn? This is so absurd!
I did it last week. a lot of mine were in the middle and only a select few were to the left or right. Some of the analysis they gave was weird tho.Has anyone else completed nrf’s games and found the report so weird? I got a lot to the right and a lot to the left and the rest in the middle, I read through the qualities and I think they are completely not who I am in real life! Shall I assume pfo rn? This is so absurd!