4/9 on each column, 'excelled' in applied verbal intellect. As with others, these results were completely different to almost identical tests I have taken 😆Out of curiosity, how did you do in your tests?
4/9 on each column, 'excelled' in applied verbal intellect. As with others, these results were completely different to almost identical tests I have taken 😆Out of curiosity, how did you do in your tests?
Oh I hadn’t seen that about some December submissions not getting theirs! I submitted mine early feb and got it a couple of days agoI'm not sure this is correct. I submitted my VI in February yet there are people who did theirs in December and haven't received the holding email. That said, I think it could simply mean they've now reviewed the VI and made their decision either way.
Is this BCLP?😂Coming on here as needed to vent.
I had an AC yesterday and one of the interviews was a case study interview where the Partner would assume the role of a client when you gave a 15 minute presentation, followed by 20 minutes of questions.
When I get into my interview, the Partner immediately says that he’s not going to do the role play of being the client as he finds it pointless/stupid. It threw me off a bit, but I guess you get Partners like that and who have preferences.
However, when I was trying to give my presentation, he interrupted me about every minute with a remark and questioning me, which got me incredibly flustered. I thought the questions were supposed to come afterwards. I barely got to do a “presentation” as it was just me speaking for a minute and then him probing.
I know it’s not going to change the outcome but am I right to feel annoyed about this? Feel it’s incredibly unfair if a Partner isn’t going to follow the brief they’re given. Made all my preparation feel worthless.
I would have been sooo happy.... I would have agreed with him, and asked if he wants to just have a formal/ informal interview... (emphasis on the INFORMAL'... Then I would have veered off into what he does and asked him questions lol...Coming on here as needed to vent.
I had an AC yesterday and one of the interviews was a case study interview where the Partner would assume the role of a client when you gave a 15 minute presentation, followed by 20 minutes of questions.
When I get into my interview, the Partner immediately says that he’s not going to do the role play of being the client as he finds it pointless/stupid. It threw me off a bit, but I guess you get Partners like that and who have preferences.
However, when I was trying to give my presentation, he interrupted me about every minute with a remark and questioning me, which got me incredibly flustered. I thought the questions were supposed to come afterwards. I barely got to do a “presentation” as it was just me speaking for a minute and then him probing.
I know it’s not going to change the outcome but am I right to feel annoyed about this? Feel it’s incredibly unfair if a Partner isn’t going to follow the brief they’re given. Made all my preparation feel worthless.
ACA-DEMIC WEAPONI would have been sooo happy.... I would have agreed with him, and asked if he wants to just have a formal/ informal interview... (emphasis on the INFORMAL'... Then I would have veered off into what he does and asked him questions lol...
I see that as a blessing... Pllease tell me the firm so I can apply and ask that I 'present' to this partner lol
how many firms is everyone waiting on? im waiting on 3 and then that concludes my cycle!
ngl it is frustrating but sometimes they do that to jus test your grit! it doesn't mean your preparation went to waste, they jus wanna see how you can react to changes (which are bound to happen in a real life sitch esp if ure actually presenting to a pesky client)Coming on here as needed to vent.
I had an AC yesterday and one of the interviews was a case study interview where the Partner would assume the role of a client when you gave a 15 minute presentation, followed by 20 minutes of questions.
When I get into my interview, the Partner immediately says that he’s not going to do the role play of being the client as he finds it pointless/stupid. It threw me off a bit, but I guess you get Partners like that and who have preferences.
However, when I was trying to give my presentation, he interrupted me about every minute with a remark and questioning me, which got me incredibly flustered. I thought the questions were supposed to come afterwards. I barely got to do a “presentation” as it was just me speaking for a minute and then him probing.
I know it’s not going to change the outcome but am I right to feel annoyed about this? Feel it’s incredibly unfair if a Partner isn’t going to follow the brief they’re given. Made all my preparation feel worthless.
So far, 2 VS offers, still waiting to hear back from 4 (2 for TC and 2 for VS)how many firms is everyone waiting on? im waiting on 3 and then that concludes my cycle!
Since you asked...You too... been missing your updates, how is it going?
Anyone know when the Bakers VI deadline is (summer)? On the first email it said 29th Feb, but on the email with the link it says 26th Feb...
Hi, sorry to bother you but when did you receive Morgan Lewis's rejection?Since you asked...
Willkie Farr & Gallagher ✅📼📝❌
Covington & Burling ✅❌
Shearman & Sterling ✅❌
White & Case ✅📼🎙️❌
Milbank ✅❌
Ropes & Gray ✅
Arnold & Porter ✅
Sullivan & Cromwell ✅❌
Latham & Watkins ✅🎙️❌
Kirkland & Ellis ✅❌
Skadden Arps ✅❌
Vinson & Elkins ✅❌
Weil Gotshal & Manges ✅❌
Akin ✅📝❌
Gibson Dunn ✅❌
Goodwin ✅
Cleary Gottlieb ✅❌
Paul Hastings ✅
Ashurst ✅ 📝❌
Macfarlanes ✅📝❌
Mayer Brown ✅📝❌
Winston & Strawn ✅
Morgan Lewis ✅❌
Orrick ✅
Dechert ✅📝❌
Cooley ✅❌
Morrison Foerster ✅
Slaughter and May ✅❌
✅ = applied; ❌ = PFO; 📼 = VI; 🎙️ = AC; 📝 = test.
your username and that message, whew, treat yourself over the weekend!PFO at 7pm on a Friday shouldn’t be legal