Thank you, Andrei! I really appreciate your thoughtful response. The six month NY secondment at Davis Polk sounds very interesting - the firm's stature in the US market is a huge attraction for me. If I may ask two questions:In terms of culture, I will only recommend to you firms I have done vacation schemes with, as I feel open days/other firm events do not suffice to make a strong inference in this regard. I have done 4 VS and the two firms that stood out to me in terms of how friendly people there were are Davis Polk and Willkie. For both of these firms the training style is not particularly structured, but after speaking to many trainees I believe they are well-supported. As for the other criteria, Davis Polk has exceptional reputation and history in the US, and guarantees all trainees the opportunity to do a six month secondment in their New York office (unless you want to qualify in competition law, in which case you would be expected to go on a Brussels secondment). Willkie arguably offers a broader training experience than other US rivals. While it has a great PE practice, it not solely focused on corporate and finance and has more established advisory and contentious teams.
1. What made you choose Davis Polk over the other three firms you received TCs for?
2. In your opinion, which aspects of your application were the most decisive in receiving a TC at Davis Polk? I haven't had the opportunity to interact with the firm at all so I'd feel hesitant for my first interaction with the firm to be an application. I've attended lots of online events for UK, US etc. firms (selective + non-selective) but I'm not sure if that (coupled with detailed research of Davis Polk, commercial awareness etc.) would suffice?
Thank you for your kindness + insight.