TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Chris Brown

Legendary Member
Jul 4, 2024
606
2,322
Great thank you! its always the 'story' part that throws me off, like I could talk about the Thames water situation, for example, as that's a story, but it's harder to link the wider trends of that to a firm
I think the link would be the precedent set by the deal or dispute. For Thames Water, there were a number of novel points that the courts considered re the restructuring. 🥲

The UK High Court approved the restructuring and the UK Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal made by the different creditors, upholding the UK High Court decision. 🥲

Reading firms’ summaries of it is a good way of understanding the link between wider commercial trends and the impact on law firms. I have linked some of them below:


Hopefully this helps with connecting the story to the firm, factoring in wider commercial and legal implications. I think the best way would be to use PESTLE, but I’m not too sure. 🙂​
 
Last edited:

lilymaltaba

New Member
Apr 11, 2025
2
1
Some of Goodwin's pros would include:
  • The firm is really strong in investment funds, life sciences, and mid-market PE.
  • Arguably the leading firm for venture capital (VC).
  • It consistently tops the global charts for the volume of deals they work on, although their average deal value is lower than of other elite US firms.
  • Known to have quite an entrepreneurial culture.
  • Lower trainee intake, so you will probably get more exposure to higher responsibility tasks here.
As for White & Case:
  • It has larger operations than Goodwin, both in London and at a global scale, so it may be the stronger brand name.
  • It is more full-service, so it offers a wider selection of practice area choices in which the firm has good expertise.
  • Among the best in the market for capital markets, international arbitration, banking & finance, and energy & infrastructure work.
  • Larger cohort and platform means more organized training sessions and more opportunities to network/socialize.
  • Guarantees an international secondment, which, from what I hear, is often one of the best experiences in a TC.
Ultimately, what the decision should come down to is your interests and priorities - there is no right or wrong answer. That said, both firms are among the most successful and prestigious in the world, and culture-wise have a good reputation, so you will be set to have a great career irrespective of your choice.
Thank you so much!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei Radu

TCLA Community Assistant

Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
Aug 1, 2019
15,526
21,758
Hi @Jessica Booker how do people navigate paralegal roles in law firms and completing vacation schemes? Do many people have paralegal roles and still manage to do vacation schemes? Would this come up in reference checks to your employer or in any other way? thank you
Unfortunately It isn't always straight forward. However, some paralegals manage to still do vacation schemes.

Generally, most employment contracts will have a term that will say you cannot work for another organisation without approval from the firm. For law firms, this may also specifically say you cannot do any other legal work outside of those opportunities provided by the firm.

Such terms in employment contracts generally mean you can't do a vacation scheme without approval from the firm you are a paralegal with. If you choose to breach this term, don't tell the firm, and are then found out, you are at risk of 1) losing your paralegal job and 2) being dismissed through a form of misconduct.

Even if you do get approval, there can also be challenges with:
  • Getting the specific time off for the vacation scheme, especially if you have colleagues who have already booked annual leave ahead of you.
  • Conflict checks - if the two firms are very similar, compete for work with the same type of clients, or if they are working on the other side of major matters/cases to one another, conflict checks could stop you from working for both firms. Sometimes to get around this, vacation scheme students can be allocated to specific departments to ensure you wouldn't have access to information.
Some paralegals still manage to deal with all of this and complete vacation schemes. Some firms are very open to allowing their paralegals seek out other opportunities, while others can be very restrictive.

You would need to declare any employment in a reference check process for the vacation scheme too.
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Chris Brown

toad92

Distinguished Member
Jan 21, 2025
56
220
Seeing more SH SVS offers (for which congrats!!!!) and i’m still waiting post-app … I only applied for summer but still guessing this is a pfo🥲

As I ticked the box to be on the disability confident offer an interview scheme I thought I’d get invited to the VI ??

Really thought my application was strong and I’m not sure how I don’t meet the ‘minimum criteria’ that they use for the disability confident scheme… I have really strong academics and non-legal, legal and volunteering work experience, went to an open day at the firm, really put a lot of effort into the (incredibly long) application

I must have messed something up I guess 😭
 

trainee4u

Legendary Member
Sep 7, 2023
339
688
Seeing more SH SVS offers (for which congrats!!!!) and i’m still waiting post-app … I only applied for summer but still guessing this is a pfo🥲

As I ticked the box to be on the disability confident offer an interview scheme I thought I’d get invited to the VI ??

Really thought my application was strong and I’m not sure how I don’t meet the ‘minimum criteria’ that they use for the disability confident scheme… I have really strong academics and non-legal, legal and volunteering work experience, went to an open day at the firm, really put a lot of effort into the (incredibly long) application

I must have messed something up I guess 😭
they haven't responded to me either.
when did you apply?
 

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
1,275
1,474
Hi @Amma Usman @Andrei Radu I've been asked to prep a commercial story for an upcoming interview, do you think discussing the rise in private credit would suffice or is that too broad?
Hi,

Absolutely, I think discussing the rise of private credit can make for an excellent commercial topic. Like with any commercial discussion, what really matters is how you talk about it. It’s less about choosing the perfect topic, and more about demonstrating that you understand the broader commercial context, the key drivers behind the trend, and, crucially, how it impacts law firm clients and, in turn, the law firms that advise them.

With private credit, for instance, you could explore how it has emerged as a major alternative to traditional lending post-2008, filling the financing gap left by banks due to stricter capital requirements. You might also talk about why institutional investors are increasingly drawn to the asset class, namely the higher yields and greater control over terms.

For law firms, this rise presents both opportunities and challenges: new types of financing structures, bespoke documentation, complex cross-border issues, and increased demand for private credit expertise. It’s also reshaping sponsor-lender dynamics in leveraged finance deals, especially as sponsors increasingly look beyond traditional bank syndicates.

Perhaps the best part of picking a topic like this is that it’s evolving, so it's a great chance to engage your interviewers. I’d suggest ending your discussion by asking them about their own views. For example, how do they see private credit shaping the market over the next five to ten years? This shows curiosity and opens the door to a genuine commercial conversation, which is often more memorable than a rehearsed monologue.


Jaysen had also made a post on this a few months back. Here it is -

 

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
1,275
1,474
Hi all, just wanted to ask what kind of information do you guys asked when going to a law firm open days? I just want to know what kind of "insider scoop" that I can asked for to demonstrate my research and my motivation to apply for that particular firm. I would really appreciate any examples or things i could consider.

One thing I’d say is to retain connections - some of my closest mentors are lawyers I met at open days! Try your best to get some form of connection, like their LinkedIn and follow-up after with a thanks. If you can also spark a genuine connection, maybe through shared interests, this makes it all the better!

The rest has been wonderfully covered by @Andrei Radu ‘s past post on this!
 

Apple

Legendary Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Jul 23, 2023
251
555
Seeing more SH SVS offers (for which congrats!!!!) and i’m still waiting post-app … I only applied for summer but still guessing this is a pfo🥲

As I ticked the box to be on the disability confident offer an interview scheme I thought I’d get invited to the VI ??

Really thought my application was strong and I’m not sure how I don’t meet the ‘minimum criteria’ that they use for the disability confident scheme… I have really strong academics and non-legal, legal and volunteering work experience, went to an open day at the firm, really put a lot of effort into the (incredibly long) application

I must have messed something up I guess 😭
Pretty sure the "guaranteed interview" is misleading. It is guaranteed if you meet their arbitrary requirements, which can be judged on work experience, test results etc etc. So it really isn't guaranteed.
 
Reactions: trainee4u

baj5

Star Member
Oct 19, 2023
47
98
does anyone have any tips on how to prep for critical reasoning tests and group exercises? At the end of my VS I will have to do a critical reasoning test and a group exercise and I'm not sure what resources there are out there.
 

ashwright

Legendary Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
  • Jul 10, 2023
    200
    418
    Hi guys! I have some quick questions I'd really appreciate some help with :)

    I've got a legal role lined up for when I graduate. The position is for a year & so would finish August/September 2026. It's in-house & the work is transactional so I'm hoping that I could just straight-up apply for TCs rather than VS (I'd prefer not to request as much time off).

    1. Can I apply for TCs/VS for the upcoming cycle (i.e. those with applications opening in autumn/winter 2025)? I don't really know what turnaround time firms expect between them offering someone a TC and them starting the SQE. If i applied for TCs this upcoming cycle, might my SQE start in September 2026?

    2. The timeline of things is a bit fuzzy for me so I'd also really appreciate any insight on a rough timeline between getting your TC offer, starting your SQE, doing the exam(s), starting the TC etc.

    3. Will applying for TCs be sensible given my circumstances? Or would vac schemes be better? Other than this upcoming grad role, I've had no formal legal experience.

    4. Hypothetical: a TC deadline closes in September 2025. By that point, I would have been in my graduate role for a couple weeks. Would that be a sufficient basis for me to apply for the TC or would it still be too early (and should therefore apply to the VS, and only apply to TCs once I've been in my grad role for a few months?)

    Thank you in advance :)
     

    TCLA Community Assistant

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    15,526
    21,758
    Hi guys! I have some quick questions I'd really appreciate some help with :)

    I've got a legal role lined up for when I graduate. The position is for a year & so would finish August/September 2026. It's in-house & the work is transactional so I'm hoping that I could just straight-up apply for TCs rather than VS (I'd prefer not to request as much time off).

    1. Can I apply for TCs/VS for the upcoming cycle (i.e. those with applications opening in autumn/winter 2025)? I don't really know what turnaround time firms expect between them offering someone a TC and them starting the SQE. If i applied for TCs this upcoming cycle, might my SQE start in September 2026?

    2. The timeline of things is a bit fuzzy for me so I'd also really appreciate any insight on a rough timeline between getting your TC offer, starting your SQE, doing the exam(s), starting the TC etc.

    3. Will applying for TCs be sensible given my circumstances? Or would vac schemes be better? Other than this upcoming grad role, I've had no formal legal experience.

    4. Hypothetical: a TC deadline closes in September 2025. By that point, I would have been in my graduate role for a couple weeks. Would that be a sufficient basis for me to apply for the TC or would it still be too early (and should therefore apply to the VS, and only apply to TCs once I've been in my grad role for a few months?)

    Thank you in advance :)
    1) Yes - if you are applying in the autumn/winter, then most likely you wouldn't start the SQE until September 2026. You could potentially join a January/Feb SQE intake, but given most firms are recruiting for intakes at least 30 months ahead at that point, you would have plenty of time to start the SQE in September 2026 (or even later).

    2) For the next cycle, firms will be generally recruiting for September 2028 or Feb/March 2029 TCs. If we take September 2028 as a minimum, your timeline is likely to be:

    • October 2025 to July 2026 - Recruitment process
    • August/September 2026 - SQE prep
    • January 2027 - Sit SQE1
    • April 2027 - Sit SQE 2
    • August 2027 - Receive SQE2 results
    • August 2027 - September 2028 - Gap year
    The gap year and SQE period could potentially be swapped over.

    3) Yes - unless a firm recruits exclusively or exceptionally heavy from their VS

    4) I wouldn't worry about this as TC roles won't close as early as September. It would be November by the earliest (and for some it will be as late as July 2026) and by then you would have many months of experience.
     
    • 🏆
    Reactions: ashwright

    ashwright

    Legendary Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
  • Jul 10, 2023
    200
    418
    1) Yes - if you are applying in the autumn/winter, then most likely you wouldn't start the SQE until September 2026. You could potentially join a January/Feb SQE intake, but given most firms are recruiting for intakes at least 30 months ahead at that point, you would have plenty of time to start the SQE in September 2026 (or even later).

    2) For the next cycle, firms will be generally recruiting for September 2028 or Feb/March 2029 TCs. If we take September 2028 as a minimum, your timeline is likely to be:

    • October 2025 to July 2026 - Recruitment process
    • August/September 2026 - SQE prep
    • January 2027 - Sit SQE1
    • April 2027 - Sit SQE 2
    • August 2027 - Receive SQE2 results
    • August 2027 - September 2028 - Gap year
    The gap year and SQE period could potentially be swapped over.

    3) Yes - unless a firm recruits exclusively or exceptionally heavy from their VS

    4) I wouldn't worry about this as TC roles won't close as early as September. It would be November by the earliest (and for some it will be as late as July 2026) and by then you would have many months of experience.
    Thank you so much, Jessica!!! This is super helpful & reassuring!! I really appreciate your help - you're the best!! <3

    1. What do people tend to do during the 'gap year'? I've tried having a look at some LinkedIn profiles but the people I've come across seem to list their SQE taking place over 2 years - I assume because they've also done an LLM (usually from the University of Law etc.) along with their SQE.

    2. This is probably a silly question but do firms ever accomodate earlier start dates for the seat-rotation bit (i.e., skip the gap year)?

    3. Is there a benefit to doing an LLM along with your SQE? It seems like the choice is spending the gap year either in a job or doing an LLM (which I'm assuming the firm does not fund & maintain you for?). [edit: a benefit other than a pure love for learning :)]

    Thank you :)

    Edit - Apologies, I just remembered another two questions!
    5. I understand that there's no disadvantage to doing the SQE independently - although I'm not really sure if firms prefer you to study it in a certain way (e.g., ULaw vs. BPP, the City Consortium version seems to have an extra element)?

    6. If I self-funded the SQE whilst I'm in this grad role (it's full-time, not finishing ridiculously late so maybe 7pm finishes), would it be more sensible to go for a 24-month course or a 12-month SQE course? I would have already done a law degree so have some legal knowledge already
     
    Last edited:


    Write your reply...

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.