Advice for In tray exercise

Hi,

I have an assessment centre for a vacation scheme for Pinsent Masons this week which includes an in tray exercise.

Has anyone does this before and has any advice for me?

I guess the most important is to prioritise the tasks according to their urgency and hierarchy (so do task given from partner before the task from a fellow trainee?)
Am I also expected to delegate tasks where appropriate?

Any advice would be very much appreciated:)

DLA Piper vacation scheme

AC Jan 2018

I applied for London office but the AC also had people applying to other offices so it the same process for all.

The AC had about 12-15 people on it, and at the start we had about 30 mins to chat and get to know each other a bit.
There were 3 different exercises, and we were split into 2 groups and did them in turn.

Group exercise
I think everyone does the group exercise first. You are given about 15 minutes to read through all the information provided yourself and then have about 40 minutes to discuss as a group.
There was a lot of information to read through, I would first flick through all the pages and decide which to read first based on how important. I managed to at least skim through everything, but some people didn't get to the back pages. There was a different issue to work through on each page. I think the most important thing is to try and read everything but also jot down some ideas that you can contribute to the group discussion.

The most important thing to remember is that you try and work well with the others, so make sure to include people and listen to what others are saying. But if you have a good point and the others aren't keen try and defend it a bit.

Case study
You had about an hour prep time to read through quite a lot of documents and come up with recommendations for a client's business. I would make sure you use the time well, so limit yourself reading to a certain amount of time and then use a decent proportion of it to plan your answer. Try and think broadly and consider the risks and benefits of your approach. Don't forget to pay attention to the figures!
The presentation is about 10 minutes, just to one partner who then asks a few questions. It was actually quite a fun task.

Partner interview
My interviewer was very nice and it felt like more of a relaxed conversation. He did have some prepared competency style questions and definitely asked a number of those but also asked some questions based on my application form. Have some commercial news prepared, I kept up to date with the commercial topic I wrote on in my application and also had another prepared - I talked about both.
Asked why a global law firm appealed, what my strengths were/what I would contribute as a trainee.

It is quite an intense 1/2 day, but the people were nice and helpful. Make sure you eat something before, they said they would provide lunch but it was just a few biscuit snack type things.

TCLA Conference - design your perfect conference!

Hi All,

We are planning to launch our first conference in 2019. It's going to be an intensive event packed with commercial classes, workshops, mock interviews and networking sessions.

I want the conference to really add value to your applications and future career, so I wanted to reach out to see what you would find useful in an event like this. If you could design the perfect conference, what would you include?

There are no wrong suggestions here, so please feel free to be as creative as you would like.

My ideas so far:

Classes
  • An Introduction to the City (mergers and acquisitions and the financial markets)
  • How do law firms run as a business (taught by a managing partner)
  • The future of law firms
  • US v UK firms (panel discussion)
Workshops
  • 15-minute mock interview sessions
  • Mock case study practices
  • Real legal technology practice (from a legal AI firm)
  • How to improve your writing? (from a former MC partner)
  • How do you improve your applications (from a former MC recruiter)
  • How do you excel during your training contract (for future trainees and trainees)
Networking (with other TCLA members and trainees)

Thank you!

PS: This is going to be for students, future trainees and trainees, so if you're already secured a training contract, please feel free to share your advice on what would be useful for you.

PPS: You may have seen me alluding to some big news before. This isn't the big news, that'll come later this week.

Best,

Jaysen

The Huawei security risk

I'd add the Huawei security risk to the list of commercial topics you need to know for your interviews. It's an ongoing story and links to many broader commercial issues, like the rise of China, the growing importance of cybersecurity and the clash between the US and China for the future of tech.

You can use this thread to post any stories relevant to this topic.

Here's a great series of charts from the BBC (more here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46480208):

upload_2019-2-18_9-13-3.png


upload_2019-2-18_9-13-17.png

Commercial Awareness Video Updates

Hi Guys!!

When prepping for applications and interviews I realised there aren't many videos online about commercial awareness and the whole process - would this be something people would be interested in? I'm hoping to film a commercial awareness recap approx. once a fortnight. Just wanted to gauge interest on here and to find out if there was anything specific anyone hoped to see!

(I am by no means an expert at all on this, however I enjoy learning from videos so I thought I'd help put what knowledge I have to good use!)

I'm very nervous posting this so please be nice:rolleyes:

Clyde & Co Vacation Scheme 2019

Clyde & Co Vacation Scheme 2019

The interview was with a senior associate and a member of the graduate recruitment team. The interview itself was pretty straightforward for the most part...why law, why Clyde & Co and then a lot of competency questions. I was also questioned a lot about why I gravitated towards disputes over transactional work. A lot emphasis was placed on how I prioritised work, how I managed stress and whether I enjoyed working under pressure.

For the commercial question I was simply asked to talk about a news story that interested me. They did ask me how the story would effect the firm and how they would be able to capitalise on those developments, so a good understanding of the firms practice areas and international strategy was key.
The main curveball at the interview was that they gave us a mini case study half-way through without telling us beforehand. It was a pretty typical shipping scenario where a ship caught fire when transporting cargo to the buyer. That's the rough idea. There are a few finicky bits that I forget. I would keep in mind that Clyde & Co's bread and butter is insurance litigation so that should naturally be a big focal point of your discussion. I talked about third party cover, trade credit insurance and fire insurance and then identified the parties that would be involved in the different potential disputes. I asked for a pen and paper to do out a diagram which made it much easier to keep track of who's suing who..it does get a bit confusing otherwise.

In general it was a pretty standard interview. They clearly had a set list of questions which they wanted to ask. Personally, I did find it a bit difficult to build rapport with the interviewers because it was so rigid.

Demystifying AI

Hey!

Please see attached a very informative video provided by Richard Kemp at Kemp IT Law.

The video contains the following:
  • A definition of what AI is.
  • The elements of AI.
  • How quickly AI is likely to be adopted.
  • Examples of current use.
  • How to analyse AI from a legal perspective.
  • Common misconceptions about AI.

Login to view embedded media

Impact of Brexit on individual practise areas

Hey guys!

Please feel free to use the attached document which considers the implications of Brexit for the majority of practice areas.

The document is quite long, however the detail is great and should definitely come in handy for questions such as 'what is the biggest impact on X' etc.

Attachments

Clifford Chance Tech Training Contract Interview 2019

Clifford Chance IGNITE Training Contract Interview 2019

The TC has a particular focus on technology. Trainees in the scheme are expected to be passionate about innovation and to help create solutions for the firm and its clients. Please note that this is the first year of recruitment. The firm may change how they assess applicants in the future.

There were two days of interviews. The first day determines whether the applicant would be suitable for a TC in general. Once successful on the first day, applicants were invited for the final day to be assessed whether they’d be a good fit for this specific programme.


First day
There were two interviews which are very similar, if not the same, to the ones given to the applicants for the standard TC.

The first interview is a competency interview with a senior associate. I was asked to introduce myself, then answer questions from the associate’s written list. The questions were standard:
  • Why commercial law
  • Why the firm
  • Overcoming challenges
  • Teamwork
  • Dealing with difficult people
  • Balancing different workload
As usual, prepare answers but do not recite from memory. Talk about your experiences naturally and it’ll be fine.

The second interview is a case study with a partner. Same with the standard TC process, there is a 30-min preparation time to write an email summarising a fictional acquisition. After that there is a 45-min to 1-hour interview to present the findings and answer follow-up questions. I don’t think it is crucial to spot all the issues but you should be able to identify most of them. The partner I was with was kind enough to give me guidance on some issues. After the case study, the partner asks some general questions like the above.

Tip for the case study is write and talk about the issues systematically and logically. The format I used was group issues in categories first (e.g. issues clashing with client’s business plan, logistical issues) and then split each category into practice areas. Listen and don’t be afraid to take hints from the partner because that is one way of showing that you can take feedback and that you can expand on what he or she tells you.

After the interviewers deliberate, the graduate recruitment team emails everyone in the evening, revealing the results. Successful applicants are invited to the second/final day.


Second day
There is only one interview - case study related to improving processes - with a partner and either a person from the technical team or an associate on the day. There are 30 mins for reading and preparing a presentation. After that, the applicant meets the interviewers to present their solution and answer follow-up questions for 45 mins to 1 hr. The interviewers also ask general questions at the end, e.g. why law, why this TC and personal examples demonstrating resilience etc.

This interview is designed to test how the applicant thinks on the spot and the applicant’s knowledge of the firm’s size and capabilities. So my tip before attending the interview is to relax and get some background knowledge of the firm, e.g. what tools the firm uses.

Tips for the interview itself are to present clearly and to consider possible decisions to be made if your solution is implemented. To present my solution, I used the structure - current problems, my proposed solution, benefits & expected outcome. The interviewers could challenge the proposed solution and the applicant should analyse and respond accordingly. Also remember that a law firm is a business and ultimately they need to earn money by providing valuable products and services. This mindset is especially important for this interview.


Overall
The interviews were enjoyable. It really felt like a two-way conversation, instead of prescriptive grilling. One last tip is to prepare a strong introduction. Because the interviews are CV-blind, always introduce yourself before jumping into the questions / presentation, so that the interviewer can have a preliminary image of who you are.

Linklaters Training Contract Interview 2019

Linklaters Interview 2019

(One issue that I struck me at the AC was that a few candidates knew details of the case study exercise in advance. We were given materials to read, but GR wouldn't reveal the task until 30 minutes later. However, a few candidates in my group started typing their answers enthusiastically as soon as they had received the materials. This caught me and the other candidates by surprise, and we were left wondering if they had obtained an unfair advantage from their friends or elsewhere.

As the competition is getting fierce, I think it would be useful to warn our members of this problem where appropriate so they could be more prepared mentally when attending ACs.)

When was your Linklaters interview?

January 2019

What was it for?


Training Contract

Please describe the interview process at Linklaters.

My assessment day started with an HR interview. The interviewer asked me a lot of questions about my decision-making process (why I made certain choices and how I coped with changes). There were also a few competency-based interview questions, mainly about teamwork and organisational skills. At the end of the interview, we briefly touched on my motivations for commercial law and Linklaters.

The second part of the assessment day was the work simulation exercise, which consisted of an online multiple-choice test and a case study. The online multiple-choice test covered three areas: contract interpretation, Linklaters' values and work prioritisation. In the case study exercise, I was given a few documents to read and then asked to give my opinions on relevant legal and commercial issues.

The day concluded with a technical interview. My interviewers asked me to elaborate on my written responses in the case study exercise.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the Linklaters interview?

For the HR interview, you may want to draw examples from different areas of your life (education, work experience, hobbies, extra-curricular activities, etc) to demonstrate that you are a well-rounded candidate.

For the online test, the best way to prepare is to learn about Linklaters values and have a think about what is expected of you as a junior lawyer. For the case study, it would be beneficial to have a basic understanding of how a deal is structured and the interests of each party in a transaction.

In the technical interview, I had the impression that my interviewers were looking for correct answers rather than learning about my thinking process. My advice would be to gain in-depth knowledge of a few practice areas so you can confidently hold a long conversation about them. When they say “technical”, they really mean it.

Thanks to @PMF_II for sharing.

Feedback on Applications

Hi everyone,
Im not sure in which thread to post this so feel free to move it if it doesn't belong here.
I was just wondering which firms offer feedback on unsuccessful TC applications? This could be feedback on the application itself as well as on a critical thinking test.
Im not expecting a detailed analysis of where I went wrong, but just even a paragraph or a few lines for example..."this was a strong application but X was not as good as others"... .

Many thanks :D

Weekly Writing Tip 1: Clarity of Expression

Clarity of expression in vacation scheme and training contract applications is a must if you want to stand out from the crowd. It’s brilliant if you have a lot of work experience and you participate in many extra-curricular activities, but if you can’t present them well to Graduate Recruitment then they are pointless on their own. In addition, when answering questions such as “please outline the reasons why you want to work for us” or “what challenges are affecting the legal profession today”, you need to be able to 1) sell your interest (if applicable) and 2) hook your reader. A lot of this is to do with how clear and persuasive you are with your language. This post will aim to give you the tips and tricks needed to get closer to that kind of writing.

1) Get straight to the point and state it clearly

A habit I’ve picked up this year that helps me cut down word-count and sound assertive is to get straight to the point with my answers. For example, if a question asks me to construct an argument, I will begin my answer by signposting what I will say next.

For example:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

This allows the reader to know exactly what you’re saying from the start and holds their attention, as they want to know how you’re going to support the points you’ve made. It also helps with motivation for writing. If you don’t know where to start when writing, it allows you to prepare yourself for the argument itself – just ask yourself, what exactly are my points?

I will do the same with my work experience:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

The whole point of this section is for Grad Rec to see if you have proof of transferrable skills. It’s important to dumb down what you’ve done in the past to the skills you got from them. If word count allows, you should also relate it back to a career in law.

2) Don’t be afraid to write short sentences and paragraphs

Word count will often make you trim down how you naturally write (or how you have been groomed to write in university essays). Similar to my point above, short sentences will be your saving grace in these applications. Not only are they persuasive because they make you sound assertive or confident, they save you space. Use them in your extra-curricular sections, when you’re trying to cram all the great things you’ve been up to:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

This is a paragraph in and of itself and stands well without further explanation. I reserve such paragraphs to those activities I didn’t necessarily have a large role in or were passive activities for me. Having said that, the second sentence is rather long and I might have been able to cut it further. However, don’t let that put you off long sentences, which can serve you well in some situations. A rule of thumb: don’t use too many complex sentences, one after the other. Split up your writing into simple, compound and complex sentences to allow for smooth reading.

3) Simple language

Similarly, keep an eye out for verbose words, as well as redundant words. By verbose, I mean language that sounds clever but doesn’t fit naturally into everyday language. For example, “relish” and “burgeoning” (which I embarrassingly used in one application). Additionally, redundant words might include “very”, “quite”, “undoubtedly”, “likely” and “truly”, among others. These words are not your friends – they might make the sentence sound better but they’re eating up valuable space (that will be vital for point 4 below).

Here’s an example of how additional words can be cut down:

Meaningful words in bold:

When I started my own business, it gave me a whole new perspective and allowed me to see the bigger picture when it came to finding a work/life balance.

Clear and concise version:

Starting my own business has given me a new perspective on work/life balance.

4) Use a structure to your arguments

It’s easy to waffle on in our answers and, personally, I allow myself to waffle before going back to edit. I find that allows me to write a lot more naturally than if I were forcing myself to always be concise and to-the-point.

However, it is helpful to always have a structure in mind when constructing an answer/argument. This might be common sense, but don’t lose sight of what your secondary/high school taught you in English, use the PEEE/PEER/PIE method. That is:

P – Point (state it clearly)

E – Example (what examples back up your point)

E – Explanation (expand on those examples, why do they support your point?)

R – Resolution (Tie-up your argument by saying why it matters/how it relates to the question)

I find it is easy to lose sight of a structure when you are writing about why law/why xyz firm especially, because you forget to 1) explain your exact interest in, for example, project development and 2) when you back it up with an example, you don’t expand on that example, you just state it as a fact. For instance, compare the first draft below to another beneath it:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

Although the first application got me through, I can see that I used an example and assumed my reader would understand the point I was trying to make, as there is no clear association with the project having an impact on economic growth. Part of this is to do with feeling restricted by the word count but I believe it can be done. My second answer for Shearman (the outcome of which I do not know yet) I believe is a stronger example of not just why I’m interested in emerging markets, but a clear example of my interest playing out in one of the firm’s deals.


Although writing is not necessarily the most important skill you must grasp as a lawyer, it is one of the only skills you are currently demonstrating to the recruiter (everything else they will have to take you at your word – therefore, your word is very important). Don’t be disheartened if it doesn’t come easily as you will develop with practice.

Bonus Tip: If you’re really committed to developing better writing and you’re still at uni, join your newspaper society and write for them casually. It will do wonders for your confidence with writing and you’ll probably get feedback along the way. Win-win!

RPC Vacation Scheme Interview 2019

RPC Vacation Scheme Interview 2018

When was your RPC interview?

February 2019

What was it for?


Vacation Scheme

Please describe the interview process at RPC.

This is a long but enjoyable day: 'normal' interview; presentation on the firm from the training principal and current trainee; written exercise; verbally present findings of written exercise to panel; networking lunch; tour of offices.

I really liked how they split up the difficult bits with some interesting activities!

Normal interview. This is very structured interview with a partner and a member of HR. They are required to stick to the question sheet. Mix of motivation, competency and behavioural questions.

Written exercise. Drafting a memo on a business-orientated 'plan-of-action'. 1.25hrs to sift through a huge pile of evidence and draft a memo.

Verbal presentation. Informally presenting the above findings to a partner and a member of HR. There is then 10-15 minutes when they question why you didn't pick other options.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the RPC interview?

Normal interview. They follow up on claims you make. I said that I applied to the firm for its insurance work, so they quizzed me about current issues effecting the insurance sector.

Written exercise. There's way too much information to take in so feel confident in discarding that which isn't supportive of your claim. Would recommend bringing sticky notes as there were a few awkward moments in the presentation component where I was flicking back and forth through the pack trying to find evidence to back up my points. Also, don't feel the need to write everything in prose. I wrote mainly in bullet-point format. I believe that being concise and specific is the key here.

Verbal presentation. I think that being confident in your decision is vital here. The panel will question your reasoning, but as long as you can show logical and structured thinking - most of the options available could be convincing.

Addleshaw Goddard Vacation Scheme Interview 2019

Addleshaw Goddard Vacation Scheme Interview 2018

When was your Addleshaw Goddard interview?

January 2019

What was it for?


Vacation Scheme

Please describe the interview process at Addleshaw Goddard.

The day is split into 4 sections: contract review; group exercise; partner review and; partner interview.

The day began with a contract review, drawing attention to spelling, grammar, punctuation, and form mistakes.

The group exercise is business-orientated, no previous legal knowledge is required. It required discussing various issues in a group, and then presenting a group solutions to a problem.

The partner review is perhaps the most tricky part of the day. Candidates are given a scenario and a stack of documents. There is a lot of info here so don't be afraid to gloss over what isn't necessary. Candidates are given 45 minutes to formulate a business proposal, then present this verbally to two partners. The partners then quiz you on your reasoning and introduce new information to the scenario.

Finally, there is a 'normal' interview. 'Why AG?' and 'why law?' are asked, alongside one or two behavioural-type questions. There was also quite a heavy discussion on commercial issues. The format, however, was relatively unstructured which gave the interview a relatively relaxed feel.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the Addleshaw Goddard interview?

Know AG's main practice areas and current issues affecting the firm. I'd also recommend getting to grips with the firm's main competitors and formulate an opinion of how AG remains competitive. In the partner review section, don't be afraid to stick to your guns. The partner's try and make you doubt yourself to see whether you can hold your nerve (n.b. don't bullishly stick to your original idea if it's made obviously clear that its a bad option!)

Introducing TCLA's Weekly Writing Tips!

The fastest way to improve your vacation scheme and training contract applications is to improve your writing skills. Good writing makes an application stand out. It makes your personality shine through, raises your credibility, and most of all, is enjoyable to read. That’s refreshing, especially for a recruiter who has read hundreds of similar application forms all week.

I'm pleased to introduce TCLA's writing column, which aims to provide weekly actionable writing tips to help you develop your applications, as well as your general writing skills. This will be brought to you by @Hazal.

Hazal is a recent English Literature graduate currently working in FinTech. She's a passionate communicator and enjoys interacting with likeminded people through her writing as well as in person. If she isn't doing either, you can find her bingeing on a good book or Netflix series.

I looked at one of Hazal's applications a few months ago and her answer to the question: "Tell me about a news story that interests you", was one of the best I have ever read. Keep an eye on her first article, which will be posted later today!

Gibson Dunn Vacation Scheme Interview

Gibson Dunn Vacation scheme interview (30m partner interview, article review 30m with another partner, HR interview (15m)):

· Looked through my app – said I didn’t get an A* in Economics A-level (as I have A* GCSE+Alevel grades for everything else) was I disappointed I didn’t get A*? just an A? Why was that?

· Why Gibson Dunn?

· What about how it compares to Cleary Gottlieb and Linklaters

· What do you think the real difference between US and UK firms are?

o Is it just cohort size??

· Why did you not pursue a barrister route? - > teamwork > How was playing netball?

Other interview was an article review – which position did you take? Etc…….