Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
The “skin in the game” can be demonstrated by other evidence outside of committing to the GDL/SQE, whether that be open days, insight programmes, work experience, virtual internships, e-learning, blogging/vlogging m, other extra curriculars.
I think it is important to show commitment, but I...
It’s typically just name dropping - it doesn’t really hold much weight just naming someone but the context in which you are explaining why you feel you should name drop/why it’s important to you application can be persuasive if there is purpose behind it. If you are just throwing it in there for...
Anyone is eligible to take the SQE assessment as long as you have an undergraduate degree level qualification (from any country, and any degree discipline). Given you are on an LLM course now, I would assume that is the case.
The quality of writing will always be assessed throughout your application. Focous on your responsibilities, impact and learning from the work experience rather than claiming skills. If you do the above the skills will more likely than not be evident.
No - there is no need to do this. The question is not asking you to do this and given the word count you can't really do anything justice if you do. What you can do is be more subtle in choosing personal qualities that the firm value and are more aligned with your personal strengths though...
This really comes down to two key factors:
1) Do you think your grades will show some markable improvement since your last set of results?
2) Is the deadline for the opportunity in middle-to-late December (or later) and does the firm recruit on a rolling basis?
If yes to both questions, I...
Someone applying now could have to:
- complete both the penultimate and final year of their undergrad degree (or do the PGDL if a non-law finalist). That will take people through to June 2025
- They then need to do the SQE, which will generally take 12 months from starting a course to getting...
The difficulty is here that unfortunately you won’t have anyone to verify your circumstances or how they impacted your studies - in these instances firms can be reluctant to consider them as ultimately there is no evidence of them.
You can still include explaining your mitigating circumstances...
I’d generally go with the firm’s full name as the firm doesn’t use this acronym in their marketing materials. However, looking at our successful application database for the firm, some people have used CRS and have got interviews (so it clearly is not a big issue to the firm.
This is a system some firms have used. It’s not common, but can often be a much more time effective way of doing things for candidates (eg they don’t invest many hours into an application to then be filtered out by a 30 minute test).
I think it actually needs to be a compromise and in between these two elements. You may want to be selective in what you include, but I wouldn’t just list out everything as there needs some context as to what you did/what was your impact for anything you do include.
If you are concerned about your test result, I would wait until 12 months have passed before taking it as there won’t be a way to retake it if they work to a once in twelve month cycle.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.