Hi @Jessica Booker, hope you are doing well. Could you please tell me, for the TCLA general mock interview, do we get the feedback during the same meeting? Thanks.
Yes - it is all done in one session as far as I am aware. Tagging in @Jaysen who will be able to confirm thoughHi @Jessica Booker, hope you are doing well. Could you please tell me, for the TCLA general mock interview, do we get the feedback during the same meeting? Thanks.
Thank you for your response, I am a mature candidate with years of work experience and trainings so my CV doesn't have the same look as an individual that has just graduated.I would personally suggest including this in your CV within the two page limit and in the normal academic section.
You may want to put your work experience first then, but I could still include this academic detail. It’s very important, especially given the strong correlation between stronger academic results and passing the SQE.Thank you for your response, I am a mature candidate with years of work experience and trainings so my CV doesn't have the same look as an individual that has just graduated.
Thank you Jessica, I already completed my LPC years ago, I am attempting to reapply to firm I had sent my CV before, the old CV had my classification of my degree , GDL and LPC do I need to do a breakdown of every module I have ever had even If I have worked for over a decade is my question?You may want to put your work experience first then, but I could still include this academic detail. It’s very important, especially given the strong correlation between stronger academic results and passing the SQE.
If you are struggling with space, then focus your work experience to the most relevant/interesting jobs
Not necessarily every module, but highlighting strengths in your academics beyond your overall grade is probably worthwhile, especially if you can tie what you learned to the career you are pursuing.Thank you Jessica, I already completed my LPC years ago, I am attempting to reapply to firm I had sent my CV before, the old CV had my classification of my degree , GDL and LPC do I need to do a breakdown of every module I have ever had even If I have worked for over a decade is my question?
Not necessarily every module, but highlighting strength in your academics beyond your overall grade is probably worthwhile, especially if you can tie what you learned to the career you are pursuing.
Thank you for your reply Jessica, I had STEM degree with an integrated masters, its been a bit hard to reconcile those courses to social sciences or arts based courses the profession generally sees as converters, other than stating I maintained my classification from the first year to the last year of my degree, its been challenging trying to put across how those types of modules and feed into commercial law.
Amazing news - congratulations!TC offer at my dream firm. I was rejected at the final stage of the TC application process for another firm that I loved last cycle which was so disappointing. I couldn't have done this without the support and information provided by this forum! It's really true - keep going and you will get a TC at the firm that is absolutely right for you.
I generally feel the narration of the situation is rarely needed. You don’t need to detail the entire situation - just key details like when and where it was. The “T” should then explain the situations purpose.Hello @Jessica Booker , for answers that require the STAR framework, could you please tell me the proportion of each aspect of STAR? I have answers where it's just not possible to define the situation in a single sentence, and as a result, I have to go on for quite a bit when I narrate the situation. Is this fine? I know that the 'action' section should be the most detailed but I am just confused.
Secondly, when do we apply the STAR framework? Is it only for questions that begin with "Tell me about a time when you displayed?" or can it be applied to other questions as well?
Thanks.
Thank you for your answer, Jessica. Just a follow-up question here, there is also a part called 'Reflection' wherein people reflect on their key learnings. Do you think it's neccessary for all answers or only where we think we have significant learnings?I generally feel the narration of the situation is rarely needed. You don’t need to detail the entire situation - just key details like when and where it was. The “T” should then explain the situations purpose.
To me the rough split should be 15/15/45/25 (percentage of the total answer here, not seconds) in the STAR format.
A reflection isn’t just about a learning, it can also be about your own reflections on the situation - how you felt about it for instance. But yes I would try to include this detail in some format as it shows more about your character rather than just your abilities.Thank you for your answer, Jessica. Just a follow-up question here, there is also a part called 'Reflection' wherein people reflect on their key learnings. Do you think it's neccessary for all answers or only where we think we have significant learnings?
Check Chambers and Partners UK, Legal 500 and legal cheek if they have a profile on there and the lawyer. Also check their socials like twitter and linkedin. Hope that is helpful.Does anyone know what Paul Hastings' strengths in the UK are? Keep seeing things about them being strong in funds work but Chambers/Legal 500 says otherwise.