Hi @Jessica Booker which points should one touch on when introducing in a CV-blind interview? And when asked about differences from competitors is it enough to mention one point?
I would mention more than one point when discussing what makes the firm different than competitors - realistically you probably want to aim for three points if you can.Hi @Jessica Booker which points should one touch on when introducing in a CV-blind interview? And when asked about differences from competitors is it enough to mention one point?
D&I is commonly used enough that the acronym is fine. If you are referring to something the firm does, just double check this is the acronym they use as there are a lots of similar acronyms (ED&I for instance).Hello @Jessica Booker hope you are well. Is it okay to use the acronym 'D&I' in our app? Or should we use '(D/d)iversity (and/&) (I/i)nclusion' instead? Thanks.
I am making a broad claim about the firm's D&I efforts but I just figured that they use I&D instead. Should I use I&D too, even though I am not referring to something specific that the firm does in that sentence?D&I is commonly used enough that the acronym is fine. If you are referring to something the firm does, just double check this is the acronym they use as there are a lots of similar acronyms (ED&I for instance).
If the firm uses I&D then I would use that instead.I am making a broad claim about the firm's D&I efforts but I just figured that they use I&D instead. Should I use I&D too, even though I am not referring to something specific that the firm does in that sentence?
No - this is very common. Being flexible when you need to correct your thinking is an important skill to have as a traineeHi @Jessica Booker if I misunderstood something in a case study and was then questioned if that’s really the meaning and I then changed my response since I my initial understanding was wrong - will that be a major issue when deciding on making an offer?
There is no need to do this.Hi @Jessica Booker would I need to send a thank you email to my interviewer or is it at least advisable?
They are all fine (although 5 skills rather than 3!)Hi @Jessica Booker
I have quick q - what can be three important skills to be a legal technologist. I want to mention Analytical and problem-solving skills, adaptability, communication/collaboration. Would these be fine
No. There are a whole host of reasons why the other person hasn’t heard back but could still be successful.Hi @Jessica Booker if two people completed an AC on the same day and only one received an offer so far, does that mean that the other has been unsuccessful if they have not heard back yet?
Generally it really won’t have any impact whether you choose a dissertation or not. Same goes for the language module - the only way I can see this being an easy option is if you have studied the language already or have a level of fluency in it already. It won’t be seen as a waste - most law firms recruit non-law grads, so doing a non-law module is not going to be an issue generally.Hello, I’m not sure if this is the right thread to ask this question on, but I am in my second year of Law and I have to pick my optional modules for my final year. Part of this means deciding between doing a Dissertation (which takes up 2 modules) or a smaller research project (which only takes up 1). I was wondering if anyone has any experiences or opinions of doing a Dissertation - is it something you regret? Would you have rather taken another taught module? Was it worth it? Is it something that helped you in your future career/ when applying for jobs?
I was also wondering @Jessica Booker from the perspective of a law firm, do you think a Dissertation would be a lot more valuable in the long term when applying to VSs and TCs? Is this something law firms care about? Will I be disadvantaged if I have not done a dissertation as part of my undergrad?
We also are given the option to take a Modern Foreign Language module as an open unit. I was wondering how Language modules were seen by employers? Would it be seen as a waste to take a language module instead of another taught law module?
Thank you in advance!
Great, thank you! That was really helpfulGenerally it really won’t have any impact whether you choose a dissertation or not. Same goes for the language module - the only way I can see this being an easy option is if you have studied the language already or have a level of fluency in it already. It won’t be seen as a waste - most law firms recruit non-law grads, so doing a non-law module is not going to be an issue generally.
The only impact I can see it having is grades or if you wanted to go into a very specific niche in law.
If you are not great at research projects, then I would avoid a dissertation purely to ensure you can achieve the best grade possible (the module is likely to have more impact, but even then it is small impact).
If you really wanted to get into a niche in law, then doing your dissertation on that niche could set you up well to pursue it later on, but again the impact would be just one minor contributor rather than anything that would define the rest of your career.