TCLA Community Assistant
Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
That makes sense, thank you. Would you also suggest using elliptical language as opposed to full sentences? E.g. "Sat on X Committee. Conducted Y and Z" instead of "I sat on the Committee of X, which gave me the chance to conduct Y and Z".
Also, unrelated matter, but I've been trying (to no success) to reach my academic references whom I usually list on my applications. They agreed to be my references for applications back in 2018/19, but I haven't been in touch with them since, and now I'm worried they wouldn't respond if a firm asked them for a reference since they're not answering my emails or calls.
When do firms typically check an applicant's references (if at all)? What if a referee doesn't respond? Do you reckon firms might be more forgiving with that now that it's hard to get in touch with our referees since we can't exactly just walk into their office and ask them in person?
“which gave me a chance” would be verbose/unnecessary even in full sentences. I sat on the Committee of X and conducted Y and Z" would be much better.
But in a CV with bullet points your sentences don’t have to be in full prose.
References vary between firms. Some ask pre invitation to interview, while they are still considering your application. Some request it once you are invited to interview, others will only ask once they know they will make you an offer.
If they cannot get a response from your referee they will either make a decision without it, or will contact you to let you know and see if you can provide alternative contact details. Often it’s just a case of verifying your module grades, so putting them in contact with your faculties office who can provide an official transcript can be sufficient. I don’t think firms will be more lenient though.
Last edited: