General Discussion Thread 2020-21

[Tintin06]

You'll need to mention it in your application - it would be silly to keep it out of your application entirely. But in any motivational answers you need a convincing answer that would help to allievate any concerns.

Basically a recruiter for a lower ranked firm with not much similar to the firms on your CV "is this person really interested in us, or are they likely to be the person who reneges or jumps ship at the first opportunity to the type of firms their CV suggests they are truly interested in". It is up to you to explain why that isn't going to be the case.

This is really helpful advice. Have you seen many people do this successfully?

 

[Zoo]

I submitted my application for Weil last week and still haven't received the WG test. Is anyone else still waiting for it?

Unless they have changed it this cycle Weil only sends out the WG after they have reviewed your application so it can take a little while. It took me three weeks to receive mine, although I submitted my app over the holiday period which can take longer.

 

[George Rowe]

I would chase them up! I thought they had finished second rounds and were making offers, so I would get in touch with them to see what's happened with your application, even if its just to get feedback.

Thanks - I emailed them 1 week ago and they ignored me! I guess its a silent rejection!

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

This is really helpful advice. Have you seen many people do this successfully?

I have seen people manage it - but that’s typically because I think their career motivations have changed

 

[LegalNim]

Has anyone heard back from TLT? My portal has changed from "In Process. There is nothing you need to do" to just "In Process" - but I haven't had any updates. They said we'd hear back by the end of the month so I'm getting a bit antsy now.

 

[Tintin06]

I have seen people manage it - but that’s typically because I think their career motivations have changed

Thanks. That makes sense. I was worried I had the wrong kind of experience for MC/SC/transatlantic firms. I very much regret doing a VS at an American firm now. How do I convince firms like Macfarlanes and NRF that I want to work for them and that I'm not going to move to a US firm at the earliest opportunity?

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

Thanks. That makes sense. I was worried I had the wrong kind of experience for MC/SC/transatlantic firms. I very much regret doing a VS at an American firm now. How do I convince firms like Macfarlanes and NRF that I want to work for them and that I'm not going to move to a US firm at the earliest opportunity?

Focus on what those firms can offer you, that a US firm cant

 

[Lawbour]

Adding onto what @Stefano said, for T/F/CS questions, you should look for something that directly affirms or directly contradicts the statement. Otherwise, the answer is 'cannot say'. You do not rely on any 'general knowledge'.

From my understanding this is what distinguishes T/F/CS from T/Probably True/CS/Probably False/F questions (i.e. 'inference' questions in Watson Glaser), in which you are allowed to use 'general knowledge' to determine whether something is probably true or probably false.

Eg

'Most people who have salmonella experience symptoms of stomach ache and runny stool.'

Statement: 'It is common for people with salmonella to use the bathroom.'

In T/F/CS - cannot say. Nothing in the statement directly confirms or denies the link between salmonella & bathroom use
In T/PT/CS/PF/F - PT, because most people who have stomach ache/runny stool will use the bathroom (general knowledge)

Hope this helps

I used to struggle a lot with this so here’s my tip – don’t make any inferences yourself. Read the passage and the statement carefully and ask yourself if the statement is in any way “contained” in the passage (but expressed with different words). If it is, it’s true; if the statement directly contradicts or misrepresents the passage, it’s false; in all other cases it’s cannot say.

For example, if a passage says that a city has been using more and more renewable energy and the statement says something like “the city has become much more environmentally friendly in recent years” then I’d personally pick “cannot say” unless there is something in the passage that explicitly links renewable energy with positive effects on the environment – I know in the real world this link exists, but one should remain focused on the passage. I know this may sound obvious but reminding myself that I must make no inferences of my own helped me get much better! Hope this helps!

Thank you guys! This is super helpful - I'm going to try another one now!

 

[Lawbour]

Mishcon de reya have a question on their VS application which asks you to write about a topic that interests you and that you can talk about with your friends... would this need to be something lighthearted? I have an interest in some current affairs going on in Pakistan which are quite serious but not sure if should talk about that

Also, they have another question which asks about a 'legal case'... I wanted to talk about the Sainsburys v Mastercard case (Mishcon advised Sainsburys on the case) that has just been to the SC and the implications on competition law as a result of the decision but I've also briefly mentioned the case in the 'Why us' question so not sure if I should look for something else

Any insight is really appreciated

 

[Emily77]

Anyone else heard from Latham post-VI?

 

[tractor12]

Thanks. That makes sense. I was worried I had the wrong kind of experience for MC/SC/transatlantic firms. I very much regret doing a VS at an American firm now. How do I convince firms like Macfarlanes and NRF that I want to work for them and that I'm not going to move to a US firm at the earliest opportunity?

I wouldn’t regret that - it’s a great achievement! It will have definitely given you some fantastic experience that will help you in future VSs.

 

[tractor12]

Mishcon de reya have a question on their VS application which asks you to write about a topic that interests you and that you can talk about with your friends... would this need to be something lighthearted? I have an interest in some current affairs going on in Pakistan which are quite serious but not sure if should talk about that

Also, they have another question which asks about a 'legal case'... I wanted to talk about the Sainsburys v Mastercard case (Mishcon advised Sainsburys on the case) that has just been to the SC and the implications on competition law as a result of the decision but I've also briefly mentioned the case in the 'Why us' question so not sure if I should look for something else

Any insight is really appreciated

Your topic sounds interesting and I think is fine to go for that.

I think the case is a good one to choose. It’s probably not bad to have mentioned it in your Why Mishcon but the space you have is quite limited and so would perhaps consider thinking of another reason to show you have more than a limited understanding/knowledge of the firm.

 

[CalibreX1]

Hi, does anyone know if Hogan Lovells send out the Watson Glaser test without having read your application, or do they screen your application first? Thanks!

 

[bel123456]

Hi, does anyone know if Hogan Lovells send out the Watson Glaser test without having read your application, or do they screen your application first? Thanks!

screen first!

 

[STWO]

Hi, does anyone know if Hogan Lovells send out the Watson Glaser test without having read your application, or do they screen your application first? Thanks!

They read your application after the test. I asked them why I was rejected for direct TC app and they told me it was based on my application as my WG results were good.

 

[Ali2020]

Hi All,

Has anyone heard back from Whtie & Case? I applied in June, the deadline was at the end of July, and it's almost October and still haven't heard anything? I've only received an email saying they're still going through applications....

 

[Jennifer85]

Hi All,

Has anyone heard back from Whtie & Case? I applied in June, the deadline was at the end of July, and it's almost October and still haven't heard anything? I've only received an email saying they're still going through applications....

I am still waiting as well.

 

[Lawbour]

Your topic sounds interesting and I think is fine to go for that.

I think the case is a good one to choose. It’s probably not bad to have mentioned it in your Why Mishcon but the space you have is quite limited and so would perhaps consider thinking of another reason to show you have more than a limited understanding/knowledge of the firm.

Thank you! And yeah good point! For the 'why us and why commercial law question' do you think its a good idea to split my answer into halfs, so 150 words for why us and 150 for why comm law?

 

[003]

check if you are eligible to apply to NRF's Guaranteed Interview Scheme. People with a disability are offered an interview.

Having spoken to grad rec, the scheme doesn't exempt applicants from taking the test. You still have to meet the benchmark to be guaranteed an interview.

 

[tractor12]

Thank you! And yeah good point! For the 'why us and why commercial law question' do you think its a good idea to split my answer into halfs, so 150 words for why us and 150 for why comm law?

I used about 80-100 words for why Law and then the rest for Why Mishcon. But I don’t think it matters - as long as your reasoning is clear. If doing law doesn’t seem like an obvious career path then I would consider using more space to explain that.