Linklaters Training Contract Interview 2019

Linklaters Interview 2019

(One issue that I struck me at the AC was that a few candidates knew details of the case study exercise in advance. We were given materials to read, but GR wouldn't reveal the task until 30 minutes later. However, a few candidates in my group started typing their answers enthusiastically as soon as they had received the materials. This caught me and the other candidates by surprise, and we were left wondering if they had obtained an unfair advantage from their friends or elsewhere.

As the competition is getting fierce, I think it would be useful to warn our members of this problem where appropriate so they could be more prepared mentally when attending ACs.)

When was your Linklaters interview?

January 2019

What was it for?


Training Contract

Please describe the interview process at Linklaters.

My assessment day started with an HR interview. The interviewer asked me a lot of questions about my decision-making process (why I made certain choices and how I coped with changes). There were also a few competency-based interview questions, mainly about teamwork and organisational skills. At the end of the interview, we briefly touched on my motivations for commercial law and Linklaters.

The second part of the assessment day was the work simulation exercise, which consisted of an online multiple-choice test and a case study. The online multiple-choice test covered three areas: contract interpretation, Linklaters' values and work prioritisation. In the case study exercise, I was given a few documents to read and then asked to give my opinions on relevant legal and commercial issues.

The day concluded with a technical interview. My interviewers asked me to elaborate on my written responses in the case study exercise.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the Linklaters interview?

For the HR interview, you may want to draw examples from different areas of your life (education, work experience, hobbies, extra-curricular activities, etc) to demonstrate that you are a well-rounded candidate.

For the online test, the best way to prepare is to learn about Linklaters values and have a think about what is expected of you as a junior lawyer. For the case study, it would be beneficial to have a basic understanding of how a deal is structured and the interests of each party in a transaction.

In the technical interview, I had the impression that my interviewers were looking for correct answers rather than learning about my thinking process. My advice would be to gain in-depth knowledge of a few practice areas so you can confidently hold a long conversation about them. When they say “technical”, they really mean it.

Thanks to @PMF_II for sharing.

Feedback on Applications

Hi everyone,
Im not sure in which thread to post this so feel free to move it if it doesn't belong here.
I was just wondering which firms offer feedback on unsuccessful TC applications? This could be feedback on the application itself as well as on a critical thinking test.
Im not expecting a detailed analysis of where I went wrong, but just even a paragraph or a few lines for example..."this was a strong application but X was not as good as others"... .

Many thanks :D

Weekly Writing Tip 1: Clarity of Expression

Clarity of expression in vacation scheme and training contract applications is a must if you want to stand out from the crowd. It’s brilliant if you have a lot of work experience and you participate in many extra-curricular activities, but if you can’t present them well to Graduate Recruitment then they are pointless on their own. In addition, when answering questions such as “please outline the reasons why you want to work for us” or “what challenges are affecting the legal profession today”, you need to be able to 1) sell your interest (if applicable) and 2) hook your reader. A lot of this is to do with how clear and persuasive you are with your language. This post will aim to give you the tips and tricks needed to get closer to that kind of writing.

1) Get straight to the point and state it clearly

A habit I’ve picked up this year that helps me cut down word-count and sound assertive is to get straight to the point with my answers. For example, if a question asks me to construct an argument, I will begin my answer by signposting what I will say next.

For example:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

This allows the reader to know exactly what you’re saying from the start and holds their attention, as they want to know how you’re going to support the points you’ve made. It also helps with motivation for writing. If you don’t know where to start when writing, it allows you to prepare yourself for the argument itself – just ask yourself, what exactly are my points?

I will do the same with my work experience:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

The whole point of this section is for Grad Rec to see if you have proof of transferrable skills. It’s important to dumb down what you’ve done in the past to the skills you got from them. If word count allows, you should also relate it back to a career in law.

2) Don’t be afraid to write short sentences and paragraphs

Word count will often make you trim down how you naturally write (or how you have been groomed to write in university essays). Similar to my point above, short sentences will be your saving grace in these applications. Not only are they persuasive because they make you sound assertive or confident, they save you space. Use them in your extra-curricular sections, when you’re trying to cram all the great things you’ve been up to:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

This is a paragraph in and of itself and stands well without further explanation. I reserve such paragraphs to those activities I didn’t necessarily have a large role in or were passive activities for me. Having said that, the second sentence is rather long and I might have been able to cut it further. However, don’t let that put you off long sentences, which can serve you well in some situations. A rule of thumb: don’t use too many complex sentences, one after the other. Split up your writing into simple, compound and complex sentences to allow for smooth reading.

3) Simple language

Similarly, keep an eye out for verbose words, as well as redundant words. By verbose, I mean language that sounds clever but doesn’t fit naturally into everyday language. For example, “relish” and “burgeoning” (which I embarrassingly used in one application). Additionally, redundant words might include “very”, “quite”, “undoubtedly”, “likely” and “truly”, among others. These words are not your friends – they might make the sentence sound better but they’re eating up valuable space (that will be vital for point 4 below).

Here’s an example of how additional words can be cut down:

Meaningful words in bold:

When I started my own business, it gave me a whole new perspective and allowed me to see the bigger picture when it came to finding a work/life balance.

Clear and concise version:

Starting my own business has given me a new perspective on work/life balance.

4) Use a structure to your arguments

It’s easy to waffle on in our answers and, personally, I allow myself to waffle before going back to edit. I find that allows me to write a lot more naturally than if I were forcing myself to always be concise and to-the-point.

However, it is helpful to always have a structure in mind when constructing an answer/argument. This might be common sense, but don’t lose sight of what your secondary/high school taught you in English, use the PEEE/PEER/PIE method. That is:

P – Point (state it clearly)

E – Example (what examples back up your point)

E – Explanation (expand on those examples, why do they support your point?)

R – Resolution (Tie-up your argument by saying why it matters/how it relates to the question)

I find it is easy to lose sight of a structure when you are writing about why law/why xyz firm especially, because you forget to 1) explain your exact interest in, for example, project development and 2) when you back it up with an example, you don’t expand on that example, you just state it as a fact. For instance, compare the first draft below to another beneath it:

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

upload_2019-2-12_20-42-44.png

Although the first application got me through, I can see that I used an example and assumed my reader would understand the point I was trying to make, as there is no clear association with the project having an impact on economic growth. Part of this is to do with feeling restricted by the word count but I believe it can be done. My second answer for Shearman (the outcome of which I do not know yet) I believe is a stronger example of not just why I’m interested in emerging markets, but a clear example of my interest playing out in one of the firm’s deals.


Although writing is not necessarily the most important skill you must grasp as a lawyer, it is one of the only skills you are currently demonstrating to the recruiter (everything else they will have to take you at your word – therefore, your word is very important). Don’t be disheartened if it doesn’t come easily as you will develop with practice.

Bonus Tip: If you’re really committed to developing better writing and you’re still at uni, join your newspaper society and write for them casually. It will do wonders for your confidence with writing and you’ll probably get feedback along the way. Win-win!

RPC Vacation Scheme Interview 2019

RPC Vacation Scheme Interview 2018

When was your RPC interview?

February 2019

What was it for?


Vacation Scheme

Please describe the interview process at RPC.

This is a long but enjoyable day: 'normal' interview; presentation on the firm from the training principal and current trainee; written exercise; verbally present findings of written exercise to panel; networking lunch; tour of offices.

I really liked how they split up the difficult bits with some interesting activities!

Normal interview. This is very structured interview with a partner and a member of HR. They are required to stick to the question sheet. Mix of motivation, competency and behavioural questions.

Written exercise. Drafting a memo on a business-orientated 'plan-of-action'. 1.25hrs to sift through a huge pile of evidence and draft a memo.

Verbal presentation. Informally presenting the above findings to a partner and a member of HR. There is then 10-15 minutes when they question why you didn't pick other options.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the RPC interview?

Normal interview. They follow up on claims you make. I said that I applied to the firm for its insurance work, so they quizzed me about current issues effecting the insurance sector.

Written exercise. There's way too much information to take in so feel confident in discarding that which isn't supportive of your claim. Would recommend bringing sticky notes as there were a few awkward moments in the presentation component where I was flicking back and forth through the pack trying to find evidence to back up my points. Also, don't feel the need to write everything in prose. I wrote mainly in bullet-point format. I believe that being concise and specific is the key here.

Verbal presentation. I think that being confident in your decision is vital here. The panel will question your reasoning, but as long as you can show logical and structured thinking - most of the options available could be convincing.

Addleshaw Goddard Vacation Scheme Interview 2019

Addleshaw Goddard Vacation Scheme Interview 2018

When was your Addleshaw Goddard interview?

January 2019

What was it for?


Vacation Scheme

Please describe the interview process at Addleshaw Goddard.

The day is split into 4 sections: contract review; group exercise; partner review and; partner interview.

The day began with a contract review, drawing attention to spelling, grammar, punctuation, and form mistakes.

The group exercise is business-orientated, no previous legal knowledge is required. It required discussing various issues in a group, and then presenting a group solutions to a problem.

The partner review is perhaps the most tricky part of the day. Candidates are given a scenario and a stack of documents. There is a lot of info here so don't be afraid to gloss over what isn't necessary. Candidates are given 45 minutes to formulate a business proposal, then present this verbally to two partners. The partners then quiz you on your reasoning and introduce new information to the scenario.

Finally, there is a 'normal' interview. 'Why AG?' and 'why law?' are asked, alongside one or two behavioural-type questions. There was also quite a heavy discussion on commercial issues. The format, however, was relatively unstructured which gave the interview a relatively relaxed feel.

What advice would you give to future applicants for the Addleshaw Goddard interview?

Know AG's main practice areas and current issues affecting the firm. I'd also recommend getting to grips with the firm's main competitors and formulate an opinion of how AG remains competitive. In the partner review section, don't be afraid to stick to your guns. The partner's try and make you doubt yourself to see whether you can hold your nerve (n.b. don't bullishly stick to your original idea if it's made obviously clear that its a bad option!)

Introducing TCLA's Weekly Writing Tips!

The fastest way to improve your vacation scheme and training contract applications is to improve your writing skills. Good writing makes an application stand out. It makes your personality shine through, raises your credibility, and most of all, is enjoyable to read. That’s refreshing, especially for a recruiter who has read hundreds of similar application forms all week.

I'm pleased to introduce TCLA's writing column, which aims to provide weekly actionable writing tips to help you develop your applications, as well as your general writing skills. This will be brought to you by @Hazal.

Hazal is a recent English Literature graduate currently working in FinTech. She's a passionate communicator and enjoys interacting with likeminded people through her writing as well as in person. If she isn't doing either, you can find her bingeing on a good book or Netflix series.

I looked at one of Hazal's applications a few months ago and her answer to the question: "Tell me about a news story that interests you", was one of the best I have ever read. Keep an eye on her first article, which will be posted later today!

Gibson Dunn Vacation Scheme Interview

Gibson Dunn Vacation scheme interview (30m partner interview, article review 30m with another partner, HR interview (15m)):

· Looked through my app – said I didn’t get an A* in Economics A-level (as I have A* GCSE+Alevel grades for everything else) was I disappointed I didn’t get A*? just an A? Why was that?

· Why Gibson Dunn?

· What about how it compares to Cleary Gottlieb and Linklaters

· What do you think the real difference between US and UK firms are?

o Is it just cohort size??

· Why did you not pursue a barrister route? - > teamwork > How was playing netball?

Other interview was an article review – which position did you take? Etc…….

M&A Case studies

Hello everyone!

Incase anyone is looking for any sources on understanding the different issues that should be flagged up during due diligence (in addition to The Corporate Law Academy's fantastic article on M&A's - https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/mergers-and-acquisitions-case-study/), I'd recommend reading the article "Due diligence checklist: cross-border" on Practical Law. This is the link: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreut...Id=944A4A9FCB12206ED013C64EDB509339&comp=pluk

Distinguishing Heavyweight US Firms

Hello all,

I have an assessment centre scheduled next week with L&W, and I'm looking to gain a good grasp upon the main distinctions between Latham and Kirkland, their main competitors. I'm aware that Latham is said to be more 'global' than Kirkland due to their increased presence in other regions around the world. Also, I've seen Latham described as a more full-service firm than Kirkland.

Would anyone care to expand on these points and any other relevant points when making distinctions between Latham and Kirkland?

Kind regards.
  • Like
Reactions: v123

Shoosmiths VC and TC Application

Hi Guys,

I am having a little trouble with answering this question:

" In a competitive legal market, how do you think Shoosmiths remains successful and attractive to clients without compromising on profitability? There are many complex issues which may feed into this answer, but we would like you to focus on your top three priorities. "

Any help and tips will be really appreciated.

Shoosmiths VC and TC Application

Hi Guys,

So I am having a little bit of a problem with this question for the Shoosmiths Application.

"In a competitive legal market, how do you think Shoosmiths remains successful and attractive to clients without compromising on profitability? There are many complex issues which may feed into this answer, but we would like you to focus on your top three priorities."

I'd appreciate any help and tips you can give me.

Volunteer/ Work Experience & Cover Letters

1. Can you put volunteer/ unpaid experience that has legal elements in it in your work experience section in applications? For example if you had been the President of a law society could you put this in your experience?

2. Also what in the cover letter you would be okay to just start with Dear Mr/Ms X, ........ rather than putting their name, position, the firm at the top?

All advice re cover letters and work experience is also welcome.

Interview question advice for PwC Legal

Hi guys!

I am preparing for the video interview stage and came across a practice question for PwC: What is the most difficult thing about working about you? I'm not sure what example to give which wouldn't hurt my application - previously with weakness questions I've talked about delegating tasks as a team leader and explained how I've improved. I'm reluctant to mention this given PwC's emphasis on whole leadership & leading a team as a key competency. I'd be really grateful for any advice or tips related to this.

Thank you in advance! :)