BCLP Brand Ambassador Video Interview 2019
Before the interview, they would ask you to prepare in advance, three suggestions or event ideas to promote the brand of BCLP on your campus and also to prepare a two to three-minute elevator pitch, as if you were to give one to a student at a law fair, based on your knowledge about the firm. Think about events beyond the regular networking and canapes, e.g. networking events combined with a social aspect. You may refer to events held by previous brand ambassadors, e.g. ping pong networking event.
For the pitch, make sure to do your research and understand the culture of the firm inside-out. One thing that BCLP is famous for is their work on real estate and some of the deals they have worked on involved buildings you can easily spot in the London skyline, e.g. the cheese grater building. I also included brief mentions of graduate opportunities in my pitch, e.g. the opportunity for first-year students to join their spring scheme.
Aside from aforementioned, they also asked a couple of additional questions:
- What do you think are key qualities a good brand ambassador should have?
- What extracurricular activities have you been involved in during your interview?
The whole interview lasted for about 30 minutes.
When was your Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner interview?
November 2016
What for?
Vac Scheme
Please describe the interview process at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner.
After arriving and held and in the client waiting area, we were taken to a meeting room for the written exercise. This was a case study of a company looking to expand and to give advice about which company to expand with. You were given an hour (if I recall correctly) for this and it is time pressured. Once this is finished, we were given a tour of the office and then had an interview with a partner – but this was only to discuss orally our written exercise. They would ask some questions about it, but you were just presenting your advice. Following this there was a negotiating task. You will be paired up with another interviewee and pitted against another two, and will have to negotiate a deal, with an associate or partner scoring. After this, the day is over.
What advice would you give to future applicants about the Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner interview?
For the written exercise, ensure you time manage correctly. It was very time pressured for me – look up relevant commercial knowledge in relation to financing, acquisition and mergers, and the potential issues that a company looking to grow inorganically must worry about – but also the advantages. You are required to write a letter to the company, so ensure you are not overly technical in you answer and don’t use any legal jargon, as clients do not appreciate that. For the oral presentation with the partner, just go over in your head during the break that you have to present a coherent and articulate answer about why you chose the company that you chose. Finally, for the negotiations exercise, don’t be too inflexible, but stand your ground and always find out why the other side is asking for what they are asking – if you can understand why they are asking for ‘X’, then you may be able to counter-offer something that is advantageous to you both.
When was your Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner interview?
November 2016
What for?
Vacation Scheme and Training Contract
Please describe the interview process at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner.
A group negotiation, a one-to-one role play and a written exercise. Following the vacation scheme, I was interviewed by two partners. At the assessment centre, I was asked to read through various sources of information to advise a client on an investment decision. This was to be hand-written, though treated as an email. This was followed by a role play exercise in which I met with the client, presented my ideas, and responded to any questions or challenges they had. The final task was a negotiation exercise.
What advice would you give to future applicants about the Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner interview?
For my training contract interview, the questions were rather straightforward, centred around the firm’s clients and added value, as well as how they fit with their competitors. I was also asked about the potential benefits of a merger with Bryan Cave. I was somewhat disappointed following my interview as my feedback stated that I answered questions effectively and performed very well on the vacation scheme, however the partners were not satisfied that I was motivated to pursue a career in law, or perhaps a career specifically with BLP.
